Eben Eliason wrote:
PS. I think we need to come up with some better terminology to
distinguish between collaboration sharing and journal sharing. That
would make this much easier to talk about.
I've been using the terms object push and object pull.
--Ben
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
I like these terms, but I don't think they define the split I'm
referring to. object-push and object-pull describe, sending an object
to a friend and taking something from my friend's Journal
respectively. Both of these types of sharing are object-sharing (the
recipient gets the resulting object,
On Saturday 04 July 2009 12:31:48 am Eben Eliason wrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 11:19 PM, Gary C Marting...@garycmartin.com wrote:
On 4 Jul 2009, at 03:13, Eben Eliason wrote:
snip
PS. I think we need to come up with some better terminology to
distinguish between collaboration sharing
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 2:00 AM, Andrés Ambroisandresambr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday 04 July 2009 12:31:48 am Eben Eliason wrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 11:19 PM, Gary C Marting...@garycmartin.com wrote:
On 4 Jul 2009, at 03:13, Eben Eliason wrote:
snip
PS. I think we need to come up
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 06:08, Sascha
Silbesascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 09:43:38PM +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote:
in this week we want to talk about the Journal and datastore [1]
improvements planned for 0.86.
I really hope to make it (my GSoC work depends
On 2 Jul 2009, at 14:47, Eben Eliason wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Aleksey Limalsr...@member.fsf.org
wrote:
But in that case we should provide possibility to mark objects that
can
be shared(I guess sharing all local objects by default is not a
nice idea).
Right. This would
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Gary C Marting...@garycmartin.com wrote:
On 2 Jul 2009, at 14:47, Eben Eliason wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Aleksey Limalsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
But in that case we should provide possibility to mark objects that can
be shared(I guess sharing
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 01:29:56PM -0400, Eben Eliason wrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Gary C Marting...@garycmartin.com wrote:
On 2 Jul 2009, at 14:47, Eben Eliason wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Aleksey Limalsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
But in that case we should
On 3 Jul 2009, at 18:29, Eben Eliason wrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Gary C Marting...@garycmartin.com
wrote:
On 2 Jul 2009, at 14:47, Eben Eliason wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Aleksey
Limalsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
But in that case we should provide possibility
On Friday 03 July 2009 02:29:56 pm Eben Eliason wrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Gary C Marting...@garycmartin.com wrote:
On 2 Jul 2009, at 14:47, Eben Eliason wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Aleksey Limalsr...@member.fsf.org
wrote:
But in that case we should provide
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Gary C Marting...@garycmartin.com wrote:
On 3 Jul 2009, at 23:50, Gary C Martin wrote:
On 3 Jul 2009, at 18:29, Eben Eliason wrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Gary C Marting...@garycmartin.com
wrote:
On 2 Jul 2009, at 14:47, Eben Eliason wrote:
On
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 9:52 PM, Andrés Ambroisandresambr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday 03 July 2009 02:29:56 pm Eben Eliason wrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Gary C Marting...@garycmartin.com wrote:
On 2 Jul 2009, at 14:47, Eben Eliason wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Aleksey
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Aleksey Limalsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 01:29:56PM -0400, Eben Eliason wrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Gary C Marting...@garycmartin.com wrote:
On 2 Jul 2009, at 14:47, Eben Eliason wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 1:42 PM,
On Friday 03 July 2009 11:18:24 pm Eben Eliason wrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 9:52 PM, Andrés Ambroisandresambr...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Friday 03 July 2009 02:29:56 pm Eben Eliason wrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Gary C Marting...@garycmartin.com
wrote:
On 2 Jul 2009, at 14:47,
On 4 Jul 2009, at 03:13, Eben Eliason wrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Gary C Marting...@garycmartin.com
wrote:
Devils advocate here, so just because someone was late to the
realtime
party, they don't get to download an otherwise openly published
piece
of work that could be
On 4 Jul 2009, at 03:18, Eben Eliason wrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 9:52 PM, Andrés
Ambroisandresambr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday 03 July 2009 02:29:56 pm Eben Eliason wrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Gary C
Marting...@garycmartin.com wrote:
On 2 Jul 2009, at 14:47, Eben
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 11:19 PM, Gary C Marting...@garycmartin.com wrote:
On 4 Jul 2009, at 03:13, Eben Eliason wrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Gary C Marting...@garycmartin.com wrote:
Devils advocate here, so just because someone was late to the realtime
party, they don't get to
I'm expecting you all to invent Linux groups any minute now. ^_^
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Andrés Ambroisandresambr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday 03 July 2009 02:29:56 pm Eben Eliason wrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Gary C Marting...@garycmartin.com wrote:
On 2 Jul 2009, at
On 02.07.2009, at 06:08, Sascha Silbe wrote:
[1] contains my thoughts on a VCS based datastore rewrite - a bit
fleshed out now, but still not finished. The most important part for
now is that I'd like to change the find() API call to take two
parameters instead of one.
I'm slightly
On 07/01/2009 03:48 PM, Eben Eliason wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Aleksey Limalsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 09:43:38PM +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote:
Hi,
in this week we want to talk about the Journal and datastore [1]
improvements planned for 0.86. The
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Simon Schampijersi...@schampijer.de wrote:
I guess you mean this one with object preview?
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Design_Team/Designs/Journal#10
For audio objects we might even be able to add a simple playback
functionality here. I like the preview idea -
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Aleksey Limalsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 09:48:23AM -0400, Eben Eliason wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Aleksey Limalsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 09:43:38PM +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote:
Hi,
in this
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 15:43, Eben Eliasone...@laptop.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Simon Schampijersi...@schampijer.de wrote:
Hi,
in this week we want to talk about the Journal and datastore [1]
improvements planned for 0.86. The Library activity [2] has shown some
interesting
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Aleksey Limalsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 09:43:38PM +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote:
Hi,
in this week we want to talk about the Journal and datastore [1]
improvements planned for 0.86. The Library activity [2] has shown some
interesting
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Tomeu Vizosoto...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 15:43, Eben Eliasone...@laptop.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Simon Schampijersi...@schampijer.de wrote:
Hi,
in this week we want to talk about the Journal and datastore [1]
Eben wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Simon Schampijersi...@schampijer.de wrote:
All the people involved - please attend, would be awesome if UI
designers would attend too.
I'd love to join, though I'm not sure how much attention I can give
the meeting while at work. I'll try to peek
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 09:48:23AM -0400, Eben Eliason wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Aleksey Limalsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 09:43:38PM +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote:
Hi,
in this week we want to talk about the Journal and datastore [1]
improvements
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 05:42:14PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 09:48:23AM -0400, Eben Eliason wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Aleksey Limalsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 09:43:38PM +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote:
Hi,
in this week we
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 09:43:38PM +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote:
in this week we want to talk about the Journal and datastore [1]
improvements planned for 0.86.
I really hope to make it (my GSoC work depends on it - there's a lot of
stuff to talk about and some decisions to make) but am not
Hi,
in this week we want to talk about the Journal and datastore [1]
improvements planned for 0.86. The Library activity [2] has shown some
interesting concepts as well. What are the common goals, how to move
forward, where to invest?
All the people involved - please attend, would be awesome
30 matches
Mail list logo
