Re: [Sugar-devel] Malicious code in dateutil

2020-01-23 Thread James Cameron
I agree with Martin. This security event is of no consequence to us, because we use the libraries included in Python. It reminds us too that we should avoid adding dependencies on untrusted source code, and especially be wary of adding any use of pypi. On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 07:54:07PM -0300,

Re: [Sugar-devel] Malicious code in dateutil

2020-01-23 Thread bottersnike237
On Behalf Of Chihurumnaya Ibiam Sent: 23 January 2020 22:50 To: Sugar-dev Devel Subject: [Sugar-devel] Malicious code in dateutil Dateutil has been found to contain malicious code, a github search shows 10+ uses of dateutil in Sugar Labs repos. You can read more about it here https

Re: [Sugar-devel] Malicious code in dateutil

2020-01-23 Thread Martin Abente
*"The first is "python3-dateutil," which imitated the popular "dateutil" library. The second is "jeIlyfish" (the first L is an I), which mimicked the "jellyfish" library."* If you read that carefully, it says these 2 libraries imitated the real libraries. It does not say that the original

[Sugar-devel] Malicious code in dateutil

2020-01-23 Thread Chihurumnaya Ibiam
Dateutil has been found to contain malicious code, a github search shows 10+ uses of dateutil in Sugar Labs repos. You can read more about it here https://www.zdnet.com/article/two-malicious-python-libraries-removed-from-pypi/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing