On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 22:01, Tim McNamara paperl...@timmcnamara.co.nz wrote:
On 8 October 2010 03:34, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
See http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/10386 for details. The sugar-session
process in 10.1.2 grows slowly...
There's some form of leak somewhere.
On 08/10/2010, at 3:14 AM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
Great. thanks! Setup a test machine and keeping an eye on it.
Even without waiting much, it's clear we're leaking objects referred
to the UI representation of
See http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/10386 for details. The sugar-session
process in 10.1.2 grows slowly...
There's some form of leak somewhere. Maybe we are triggerin a real
python leak, maybe we have reference loops. How do we trace this?
m
--
martin.langh...@gmail.com
mar...@laptop.org --
See http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/10386 for details. The sugar-session
process in 10.1.2 grows slowly...
There's some form of leak somewhere. Maybe we are triggerin a real
python leak, maybe we have reference loops. How do we trace this?
Tomeu wrote some instructions here:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Michael Stone mich...@laptop.org wrote:
Tomeu wrote some instructions here:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Memory_leak_testing
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Memory/Leak_testing (mirror)
Great. thanks! Setup a test machine and keeping an eye on
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
Great. thanks! Setup a test machine and keeping an eye on it.
Even without waiting much, it's clear we're leaking objects referred
to the UI representation of the access points.
`iwlist scan ` spots 37 APs, and
On 8 October 2010 03:34, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
See http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/10386 for details. The sugar-session
process in 10.1.2 grows slowly...
There's some form of leak somewhere. Maybe we are triggerin a real
python leak, maybe we have reference loops. How
7 matches
Mail list logo