On Sun, Aug 01, 2010 at 04:07:15PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 00:24, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Just wondering, how to name Sugar Packages.
>
> What are you meaning by "Sugar Packages"? Is there a wiki page or
> something I have missed?
I'm collecting info on
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 00:24, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just wondering, how to name Sugar Packages.
What are you meaning by "Sugar Packages"? Is there a wiki page or
something I have missed?
> The reasons to not reuse "package" name - it is not regular
> (GNU/Linux distributions) packages
On 1 August 2010 12:11, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> so, 3:0 for "cubes"..
>
> I guess the place where these cubes are produced could be named
> refinery.sugarlabs.org
+1
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 01, 2010 at 01:00:04AM +0100, Gary Martin wrote:
> > On 31 Jul 2010, at 23:24, Aleksey Lim wrote:
>
{...}
>
so, 3:0 for "cubes"..
>
Sugar "cubes" nicely suggest a regular, ordered volume that would hold
packed content, which
On Sun, Aug 01, 2010 at 01:00:04AM +0100, Gary Martin wrote:
> On 31 Jul 2010, at 23:24, Aleksey Lim wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Just wondering, how to name Sugar Packages.
> >
> > The reasons to not reuse "package" name - it is not regular
> > (GNU/Linux distributions) packages, because:
> >
On 31 Jul 2010, at 23:24, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just wondering, how to name Sugar Packages.
>
> The reasons to not reuse "package" name - it is not regular
> (GNU/Linux distributions) packages, because:
>
> * primal deploying model is decentralized (via 0install) not centralized
>
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just wondering, how to name Sugar Packages.
>
> The reasons to not reuse "package" name - it is not regular
> (GNU/Linux distributions) packages, because:
>
> * primal deploying model is decentralized (via 0install) not centralize
Hi all,
Just wondering, how to name Sugar Packages.
The reasons to not reuse "package" name - it is not regular
(GNU/Linux distributions) packages, because:
* primal deploying model is decentralized (via 0install) not centralized
which is the core point of regular distros
* sugar "packag
8 matches
Mail list logo