Re: [Sugar-devel] Name for Sugar Packages

2010-08-01 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Sun, Aug 01, 2010 at 04:07:15PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 00:24, Aleksey Lim wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Just wondering, how to name Sugar Packages. > > What are you meaning by "Sugar Packages"? Is there a wiki page or > something I have missed? I'm collecting info on

Re: [Sugar-devel] Name for Sugar Packages

2010-08-01 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 00:24, Aleksey Lim wrote: > Hi all, > > Just wondering, how to name Sugar Packages. What are you meaning by "Sugar Packages"? Is there a wiki page or something I have missed? > The reasons to not reuse "package" name - it is not regular > (GNU/Linux distributions) packages

Re: [Sugar-devel] Name for Sugar Packages

2010-07-31 Thread Tim McNamara
On 1 August 2010 12:11, Aleksey Lim wrote: > so, 3:0 for "cubes".. > > I guess the place where these cubes are produced could be named > refinery.sugarlabs.org +1 ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/

Re: [Sugar-devel] Name for Sugar Packages

2010-07-31 Thread Frederick Grose
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Aleksey Lim wrote: > On Sun, Aug 01, 2010 at 01:00:04AM +0100, Gary Martin wrote: > > On 31 Jul 2010, at 23:24, Aleksey Lim wrote: > {...} > so, 3:0 for "cubes".. > Sugar "cubes" nicely suggest a regular, ordered volume that would hold packed content, which

Re: [Sugar-devel] Name for Sugar Packages

2010-07-31 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Sun, Aug 01, 2010 at 01:00:04AM +0100, Gary Martin wrote: > On 31 Jul 2010, at 23:24, Aleksey Lim wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Just wondering, how to name Sugar Packages. > > > > The reasons to not reuse "package" name - it is not regular > > (GNU/Linux distributions) packages, because: > >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Name for Sugar Packages

2010-07-31 Thread Gary Martin
On 31 Jul 2010, at 23:24, Aleksey Lim wrote: > Hi all, > > Just wondering, how to name Sugar Packages. > > The reasons to not reuse "package" name - it is not regular > (GNU/Linux distributions) packages, because: > > * primal deploying model is decentralized (via 0install) not centralized >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Name for Sugar Packages

2010-07-31 Thread Frederick Grose
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Aleksey Lim wrote: > Hi all, > > Just wondering, how to name Sugar Packages. > > The reasons to not reuse "package" name - it is not regular > (GNU/Linux distributions) packages, because: > > * primal deploying model is decentralized (via 0install) not centralize

[Sugar-devel] Name for Sugar Packages

2010-07-31 Thread Aleksey Lim
Hi all, Just wondering, how to name Sugar Packages. The reasons to not reuse "package" name - it is not regular (GNU/Linux distributions) packages, because: * primal deploying model is decentralized (via 0install) not centralized which is the core point of regular distros * sugar "packag