On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 13:28, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
Hi Tomeu (and others),
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 06:48:05PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
sorry for the late reply, this is a very good question.
I think we should move to dotted version numbers for activities in 0.88,
maybe
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 04:06:08PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 13:28, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
Hi Tomeu (and others),
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 06:48:05PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
sorry for the late reply, this is a very good question.
I think we should
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
Remains to see what existing versions of Sugar would do with a bundle
with a dot in the version number.
It's parsed as int(version) [1] - so it's not going to work well!
Is there some reason that we are forced to patch
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 06:38:48PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 18:23, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 04:06:08PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
- start the dotted series from the last integer used: Browse-112.1,
Browse-112.2, etc (ugly).
No,
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 01:48:10PM -0400, Wade Brainerd wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
Is there some reason that we are forced to patch Browse and Chat such?
Are newer versions of the activities not backwards compatible with
older versions of
Hi Tomeu (and others),
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 06:48:05PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
sorry for the late reply, this is a very good question.
I think we should move to dotted version numbers for activities in
0.88, maybe interpreting a version number without a dot as 0.xx.
For now and for
Hi,
sorry for the late reply, this is a very good question.
I think we should move to dotted version numbers for activities in
0.88, maybe interpreting a version number without a dot as 0.xx.
For now and for your specific use case, what about preppending
0.84/0.86 to the activity version
Hi,
As I understand it, Sugarlabs wants to keep things simple for users by
only using the equivalent of major numbers when versioning Activities.
I am wondering, however, what version numbers can be expected for
potential future bugfix releases of Browse and Chat targeted 0.84, as it
seems
8 matches
Mail list logo
