On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey,
want to start on that kind of analysis? :)
James' self analysis is spot on.
We all wear several 'hats' Sugar contributor, Employee or volunteer,
person, . These hats bring bias which affect our decision
Daniel Narvaez reopened an interesting thread that comes up every
couple of years -- patch approval. This is an interesting and
important issue to both the Sugar community and the OLPC ecosystem.
In parallel to patch process, a discussion about culture might be
beneficial. Sugar and OLPC are
Hey,
want to start on that kind of analysis? :)
I've been considering some cultural factors but they are not related to
prestige and moneys, so they are probably pretty different from what
you have in mind here.
On Wednesday, 27 March 2013, David Farning wrote:
Daniel Narvaez reopened an
I'd just like to point out that when I add a Signed-off-by: to a patch
on Sugar, unless stated (by an OLPC ticket number or otherwise) I
think I'm doing it for technical reasons to benefit Sugar, and not to
support the OLPC ecosystem. I shall be more aware of perceptions of
bias now. Thanks for
4 matches
Mail list logo
