On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 17:42, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Martin
> Langhoff wrote:
>> On olpc-sur we're seeing reports of "my journal contents disappeared
>> after reboot". (Thread starts at
>> http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/olpc-sur/2009-August/004177.html )
>
> S
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Martin
Langhoff wrote:
> On olpc-sur we're seeing reports of "my journal contents disappeared
> after reboot". (Thread starts at
> http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/olpc-sur/2009-August/004177.html )
So, we have a couple of users who could send a sample datastore t
er Bender"
To: "Jim Simmons"
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, August 22, 2009 9:13 AM
Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] RFH - Journal corruption reports fom 8.2.1
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Jim Simmons wrote:
> Martin,
>
> For what it's worth, I've experienced this running
y. I
> regret to say that I've done this a few times.
I do this all the time and have never had a Journal corruption error
in Xephyr. Curious.
-walter
> James Simmons
>
>
>> Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:56:17 +0200
>> From: Martin Langhoff
>> Subject: [Sugar-devel]
On 21 Aug 2009, at 07:23, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 12:13 AM, Jim Simmons
> wrote:
>> For what it's worth, I've experienced this running the Sugar test
>> environment in both Fedora 10 and 11. It would not seem to be
>> specific to .82. The way to reproduce the problem i
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:08, Sascha
Silbe wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 05:13:42PM -0500, Jim Simmons wrote:
>
>> The way to reproduce the problem is to run the Sugar
>> environment in Xephyr (sugar-emulator). Do some stuff, then instead
>> of shutting down cleanly click on the "close" button
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 05:13:42PM -0500, Jim Simmons wrote:
The way to reproduce the problem is to run the Sugar
environment in Xephyr (sugar-emulator). Do some stuff, then instead
of shutting down cleanly click on the "close" button on the Xephyr
window.
This happened a lot to me as well. The
2009/8/21 Martin Langhoff :
> 2009/8/21 Tomeu Vizoso :
>> Should be kept in a subdir in there, from:
>
> Damn! I wish I had known about this! So 3 old dirs are kept - excellent.
>
>> But anyway, the failure to read the DS would be in the first boot
>> where the journal appears empty, not in the boo
2009/8/21 Tomeu Vizoso :
> Should be kept in a subdir in there, from:
Damn! I wish I had known about this! So 3 old dirs are kept - excellent.
> But anyway, the failure to read the DS would be in the first boot
> where the journal appears empty, not in the boot where the DS index
> got corrupted.
2009/8/21 Martin Langhoff :
> 2009/8/21 Tomeu Vizoso :
>> 2009/8/21 Martin Langhoff :
>>> 2009/8/21 Tomeu Vizoso :
Yes, though if we manage to get the logs dir of a machine just after
the DS was "lost", there's lots of chances we are going to be able to
>>>
>>> The ones on the ramdisk? :-
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 10:36:44AM +0200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> 2009/8/21 Tomeu Vizoso :
> > 2009/8/21 Martin Langhoff :
> >> 2009/8/21 Tomeu Vizoso :
> >>> Yes, though if we manage to get the logs dir of a machine just after
> >>> the DS was "lost", there's lots of chances we are going to be ab
2009/8/21 Tomeu Vizoso :
> 2009/8/21 Martin Langhoff :
>> 2009/8/21 Tomeu Vizoso :
>>> Yes, though if we manage to get the logs dir of a machine just after
>>> the DS was "lost", there's lots of chances we are going to be able to
>>
>> The ones on the ramdisk? :-(
>
> Is ~/.sugar/default/logs in th
On Friday 21 August 2009 05:10:21 am Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> 2009/8/21 Martin Langhoff :
> > 2009/8/21 Tomeu Vizoso :
> >> Yes, though if we manage to get the logs dir of a machine just after
> >> the DS was "lost", there's lots of chances we are going to be able to
> >
> > The ones on the ramdisk? :
On Friday 21 August 2009 05:08:28 am Martin Langhoff wrote:
> 2009/8/21 Tomeu Vizoso :
> > Yes, though if we manage to get the logs dir of a machine just after
> > the DS was "lost", there's lots of chances we are going to be able to
>
> The ones on the ramdisk? :-(
I think ~/.sugar/default/logs
2009/8/21 Martin Langhoff :
> 2009/8/21 Tomeu Vizoso :
>> Yes, though if we manage to get the logs dir of a machine just after
>> the DS was "lost", there's lots of chances we are going to be able to
>
> The ones on the ramdisk? :-(
Is ~/.sugar/default/logs in the ramdisk? This would be the first
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 08:23, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 12:13 AM, Jim Simmons wrote:
>> For what it's worth, I've experienced this running the Sugar test
>> environment in both Fedora 10 and 11. It would not seem to be
>> specific to .82. The way to reproduce the problem i
2009/8/21 Tomeu Vizoso :
> Yes, though if we manage to get the logs dir of a machine just after
> the DS was "lost", there's lots of chances we are going to be able to
The ones on the ramdisk? :-(
m
--
martin.langh...@gmail.com
mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect
- ask interesting
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 07:46, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 12:24 AM, Andrés Ambrois
> wrote:
>> I'll help in any way I can. Would an upload webservice similar to Sacha's for
>> uploading the necessary datastore bits help? We can then distribute a simple
>> cli tool that upload
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 12:13 AM, Jim Simmons wrote:
> For what it's worth, I've experienced this running the Sugar test
> environment in both Fedora 10 and 11. It would not seem to be
> specific to .82. The way to reproduce the problem is to run the Sugar
> environment in Xephyr (sugar-emulator)
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 12:24 AM, Andrés Ambrois wrote:
> I'll help in any way I can. Would an upload webservice similar to Sacha's for
> uploading the necessary datastore bits help? We can then distribute a simple
> cli tool that uploads the data.
Thanks! If Uy was using School Servers, this woul
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:40 AM, James Cameron wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 06:56:17PM +0200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>> On olpc-sur we're seeing reports of "my journal contents disappeared
>> after reboot". (Thread starts at
>> http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/olpc-sur/2009-August/004177.html
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 06:56:17PM +0200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On olpc-sur we're seeing reports of "my journal contents disappeared
> after reboot". (Thread starts at
> http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/olpc-sur/2009-August/004177.html )
Hmm. I've two XOs with 8.2.1 being used by children of
On Thursday 20 August 2009 06:58:48 pm Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> > Would be nice to have more details about the failure so we can both
> > fix it and propose the best tool for the job. Maybe a ceibal jam
> > volunteer with some linux knowledge w
g 2009 18:56:17 +0200
> From: Martin Langhoff
> Subject: [Sugar-devel] RFH - Journal corruption reports fom 8.2.1
> users in Uy
> To: OLPC Devel , Sugar-dev
>
> Message-ID:
> <46a038f90908200956h436459f3j9fa7b29bb111d...@mail.gmail.com>
> Co
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> How do you envision the UI of the tool that will recover the JEBs?
We don't need many words there :-) all we need is
- A listing of Journals available (by date - the numbers after
'datastore' are epoch seconds IIRC) - if there's only one, sk
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 18:56, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On olpc-sur we're seeing reports of "my journal contents disappeared
> after reboot". (Thread starts at
> http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/olpc-sur/2009-August/004177.html )
>
> This reminds me a lot of the issues we saw earlier in developmen
On olpc-sur we're seeing reports of "my journal contents disappeared
after reboot". (Thread starts at
http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/olpc-sur/2009-August/004177.html )
This reminds me a lot of the issues we saw earlier in development of
what became 8.2.x -- if for any reason Sugar doesn't like
27 matches
Mail list logo
