I don't want weird bugs when I finally plug in my netbook to a IPv6
connection at some IT friend's house
Optimizing bootup based on known, manufactured, fixed hardware is a great
idea though. The hardware that's built into the machine should easily be
enough to get you into a GUI.
Initializing
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 05:15, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 3:11 PM, wrote:
>> now that it's been pointed out that most of the cat processes
>> were from bootchart itself, i highly doubt there will be
>
> Heisenbug :-) even then, it does give you fairly good idea of what's
> up
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 5:35 PM, wrote:
> for known hw, but _remembering_ a fast path for _any_ hardware.
> i.e., if you've booted 10 times and never found ipv6, and always
> found the same 3 filesystems in the same partitions, maybe it's
> time to stop expecting anything else. does udev remember
martin wrote:
> In fact, this might be something that upstream wants to think about in
> a generic sense. All the boot-in-5s focus lately is a lot of fun (and
> great for end-users, I surely want _my_ boxes to boot in 5s), but
> depends in part on skipping a lot of poking and waiting for hardwa
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 3:11 PM, wrote:
> now that it's been pointed out that most of the cat processes
> were from bootchart itself, i highly doubt there will be
Heisenbug :-) even then, it does give you fairly good idea of what's
up during boot.
SoaS is meant to run on any hw out there, and a
bobby wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 11:04 AM, wrote:
> > the shell is really pretty fast, if you can keep the number for
> > spawned processes to a minimum.
>
> this sounds like a super headache to get upstream, but with a possibly
> significant payoff. are the scripts you're talking ab
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 11:04 AM, wrote:
> wade wrote:
> > These charts are really interesting (and nice looking!). The whole thing
> > probably requires a lot of analysis to make real gains though. I wonder
> > what all those calls to 'cat' are in the first chart. I also wonder if it
>
> i
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Martin Dengler wrote:
> > Does anyone know if SoaS uses JFFS2 compression?
>
> For the XO nand images, it does.
Last time I heard SoaS images were down to ~400MB. Perhaps we should
consider disabling JFFS2 compression for performance? 600MB should be
plenty to
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 10:19:08AM -0500, Wade Brainerd wrote:
> These charts are really interesting (and nice looking!). The whole thing
> probably requires a lot of analysis to make real gains though. I wonder
> what all those calls to 'cat' are in the first chart.
I think the first two charts
wade wrote:
> These charts are really interesting (and nice looking!). The whole thing
> probably requires a lot of analysis to make real gains though. I wonder
> what all those calls to 'cat' are in the first chart. I also wonder if it
i did some looking, and while i don't think i've found
These charts are really interesting (and nice looking!). The whole thing
probably requires a lot of analysis to make real gains though. I wonder
what all those calls to 'cat' are in the first chart. I also wonder if it
would be possible to defer network initialization until after the GUI comes
u
For my OLPC/XO-1 laptop these days, I'm using the Sugar-on-a-Stick
kickstart files[1]. I want my XO to boot fast, not because I boot it a
lot, but because it boots really, really slowly right now. So I
installed bootchart, changed olpc.fth to use it, rebooted, and voila,
got this chart:
http://ww
12 matches
Mail list logo
