I added a RUN_IN_WINDOW config option. Probably needs some work and
untested on ubuntu, but it's a start. You can use the RESOLUTION
option to specify dimensions.
On 26 July 2012 13:13, Manuel Kaufmann wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
>> - xinit $(SCRIPTS)/xi
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Manuel Kaufmann wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> > - xinit $(SCRIPTS)/xinitrc -- $(XINITDISPLAY) &>>$(LOGFILE)
> > + xinit $(SCRIPTS)/xinitrc -- /usr/bin/Xvnc $(XINITDISPLAY)
>
> Can we add this as a "make command" so
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> - xinit $(SCRIPTS)/xinitrc -- $(XINITDISPLAY) &>>$(LOGFILE)
> + xinit $(SCRIPTS)/xinitrc -- /usr/bin/Xvnc $(XINITDISPLAY)
Can we add this as a "make command" so we are able to run Sugar in
this way? I'm not good a Make programmi
Something like this. Connecting to localhost:6000 with vncviewer
worked for me then.
[dnarvaez@thinkpad master]$ git diff
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index e5e781b..76e4930 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ build-%:
$(TYPESCRIPT) "$(JHBUILD) buildone $*" $(LOGFILE
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
>> What's about configuring the new X with a small resolution and access
>> to it through VNC? (I think this is possible but I don't know how to
>> do it :) )
>
> Something like that might work yeah.
Do you have some idea about how to do this
On 12 July 2012 13:04, Manuel Kaufmann wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 6:12 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
>> It's not right now because Xephyr crashes in Ubuntu (upstream bug and
>> they are not patching it). That's the reason I had to go for a full X
>> server initially.
>
> What's about configurin
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 6:12 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> It's not right now because Xephyr crashes in Ubuntu (upstream bug and
> they are not patching it). That's the reason I had to go for a full X
> server initially.
What's about configuring the new X with a small resolution and access
to it th
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 6:15 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> I probably wouldn't claim it's a replacement of sugar-jhbuild, that
> project is still maintained etc. Maybe alternative?
Yes, "an alternative" is a good alternative :)
I've already changed it.
--
Kaufmann Manuel
Blog: http://humitos.wor
I probably wouldn't claim it's a replacement of sugar-jhbuild, that
project is still maintained etc. Maybe alternative?
Thanks!
On 12 July 2012 00:15, Manuel Kaufmann wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Manuel Kaufmann wrote:
>> * [wiki page] I'm going to create a wiki page that explains
It's not right now because Xephyr crashes in Ubuntu (upstream bug and
they are not patching it). That's the reason I had to go for a full X
server initially.
Though I must day I got to like it now and I wouldn't go back to a
window myself, I'm even using it as my main desktop (something I think
mo
On 11 July 2012 21:53, Manuel Kaufmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I found sugar-build really easy-to-use. I tested it on F16 (32 bits)
> and F17 (64 bits) without problems (actually I sent a patch that fixes
> the error that I had on F16). On the other hand,
>
> * [root permissions] I think we should ad
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Manuel Kaufmann wrote:
> On the other hand,
What's about running sugar-build on a window? Is this possible?
--
Kaufmann Manuel
Blog: http://humitos.wordpress.com/
Porfolio: http://fotos.mkaufmann.com.ar/
PyAr: http://www.python.com.ar/
__
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Manuel Kaufmann wrote:
> * [wiki page] I'm going to create a wiki page that explains how to
> use "sugar-build", just in case: Someone has already done this?
I started writing here:
* http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/SugarBuild
Hope it helps!
--
Hello,
I found sugar-build really easy-to-use. I tested it on F16 (32 bits)
and F17 (64 bits) without problems (actually I sent a patch that fixes
the error that I had on F16). On the other hand,
* [root permissions] I think we should add a message to the user
letting him know about "which" comm
14 matches
Mail list logo
