El 26/04/16 a las 21:35, Sebastian Silva escribió:
>
>
> El 26/04/16 a las 18:31, Manash Raja escribió:
>>
>> You were? Awesome! Did you have to further patch sugar-toolkit-gtk3?
>>
>> I didn't have to do any further edits than your two patches.
>
> I just tried it again and still get a segfaul
El 26/04/16 a las 18:31, Manash Raja escribió:
>
> You were? Awesome! Did you have to further patch sugar-toolkit-gtk3?
>
> I didn't have to do any further edits than your two patches.
I just tried it again and still get a segfault. What desktop environment
are you using?
_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I believe that abstracting the x11 dependency will be beneficial beyond
Broadway. It will help us when we move to Wayland for example.
Thanks,
Sam
On 27 April 2016 9:31:38 AM AEST, Manash Raja wrote:
>>
>> You were? Awesome! Did you have to furt
>
> You were? Awesome! Did you have to further patch sugar-toolkit-gtk3?
I didn't have to do any further edits than your two patches.
I wonder if running the full shell is really desirable on a browser. It
> sounds difficult as it handles a lot of X11 specifics.
>
Ya, the jarabe.main is failing w
El 26/04/16 a las 17:18, Manash Raja escribió:
> I am trying to find out where the execution of "python2 -m
> jarabe.main" is failing to run sugar on broadwayd.
I wonder if running the full shell is really desirable on a browser. It
sounds difficult as it handles a lot of X11 specifics.
Also, I w
On 26 April 2016 at 18:34, Sebastian Silva
wrote:
> That was a rough uncommitted patch...
>
> Hopefully we'll have merge requests for it soon :-)
>
Sure, I guess I'm encouraging the adoption of modern practices where-ever I
can :D
I'm very excited about Broadway and Sugar!! :D
_
El 26/04/16 a las 17:18, Manash Raja escribió:
> Cool,
>
> Applied both the patch and was able to get the activities running on
> broawayd.
You were? Awesome! Did you have to further patch sugar-toolkit-gtk3?
> While most of the activities ran, "Jukebox" didn't run due to the call
> ".get_xid()" f
Cool,
Applied both the patch and was able to get the activities running on
broawayd.
While most of the activities ran, "Jukebox" didn't run due to the call
".get_xid()" from it.
I am trying to find out where the execution of "python2 -m jarabe.main" is
failing to run sugar on broadwayd.
On Wed,
On 26 April 2016 at 16:57, Sebastian Silva
wrote:
> Forgot to attach the rough patch...
>
Patches on a mailing list, hehehe I haven't seen that in a few years :D
Please do post a link to a git branch :)
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.s
Forgot to attach the rough patch...
El 26/04/16 a las 15:19, Sebastian Silva escribió:
>
> El 26/04/16 a las 15:08, Manash Raja escribió:
>> As Sebastian mentioned, it failed with segmentation fault. I then
>> though of first applying Sebastian's patch to try it again before
>> discussing it.
>
On 26 April 2016 at 16:19, Sebastian Silva
wrote:
> A real product would need some product design and a sustainability
> strategy.
>
Sugar Labs can sell access to a hosted version to 1st world parents at
$10/month.
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-de
Hi
On 26 April 2016 at 16:08, Manash Raja wrote:
>
> Ya, I tried running sugar on bradwayd just today itself and was about to
> ask Sebastian about it. Got surprised to see this thread :)
>
Great minds think alike - or fools seldom differ??? : D
> 1) How and where will this feature be used.
>
El 26/04/16 a las 15:08, Manash Raja escribió:
> As Sebastian mentioned, it failed with segmentation fault. I then
> though of first applying Sebastian's patch to try it again before
> discussing it.
Great, focusing on activities first will make the effort simpler. The
pull request can be found
Hi,
Ya, I tried running sugar on bradwayd just today itself and was about to
ask Sebastian about it. Got surprised to see this thread :)
As Sebastian mentioned, it failed with segmentation fault. I then though of
first applying Sebastian's patch to try it again before discussing it.
I am interes
On 26 April 2016 at 15:36, Sebastian Silva
wrote:
> I posted this idea to the
> https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Summer_of_Code/2016 but we got not student
> proposals for it.
>
OH! Wow Haha I must have seen that but not actually registered it in my
mind :) Sorry!! :D
__
El 26/04/16 a las 14:28, Dave Crossland escribió:
> I wonder if anyone has tried running Sugar under broadway?
I think this could be low hanging fruit. GTK3 python apps work well
enough. And recently I submitted a patch decoupling sugar-toolkit-gtk3
from the Sugar shell (making the shell optiona
Hi
I wonder if anyone has tried running Sugar under broadway?
If you haven't heard of broadway, its a part of the GTK+3 project that
allows interacting with GTK+3 applications through a browser, using
VNC-style techniques. It seems this might be an interesting alternative to
Sugarizer for making
17 matches
Mail list logo
