On 01.12.2009, at 02:43, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 02:15:46AM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 29.11.2009, at 15:02, Sascha Silbe wrote:
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.86/Platform_Components
Speaking of Etoys - that 0.86 page lists 4.0.2206, whereas the actual
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 11:27:27AM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 01.12.2009, at 02:43, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 02:15:46AM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 29.11.2009, at 15:02, Sascha Silbe wrote:
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.86/Platform_Components
Speaking
On 01.12.2009, at 13:33, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 11:27:27AM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 01.12.2009, at 02:43, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 02:15:46AM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 29.11.2009, at 15:02, Sascha Silbe wrote:
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 02:48:18PM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 01.12.2009, at 13:33, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 11:27:27AM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 01.12.2009, at 02:43, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 02:15:46AM +0100, Bert Freudenberg
On 01.12.2009, at 15:13, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 02:48:18PM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 01.12.2009, at 13:33, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 11:27:27AM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 01.12.2009, at 02:43, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Tue, Dec
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 03:45:08PM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 01.12.2009, at 15:13, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 02:48:18PM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 01.12.2009, at 13:33, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 11:27:27AM +0100, Bert Freudenberg
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 05:50:59PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 05:37:44PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 03:02:15PM +0100, Sascha Silbe wrote:
Once 0install support gets merged, Sugar Platform should be enhanced to
include build tools
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 03:10:29PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 05:50:59PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 05:37:44PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 03:02:15PM +0100, Sascha Silbe wrote:
Once 0install support gets merged,
On 29.11.2009, at 15:02, Sascha Silbe wrote:
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.86/Platform_Components
Speaking of Etoys - that 0.86 page lists 4.0.2206, whereas the actual Etoys
version in the 0.86 release was 4.0.2319 (and 4.0.2332 in 0.86.2). How come?
Should I just change it, and if so, to
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 02:15:46AM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 29.11.2009, at 15:02, Sascha Silbe wrote:
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.86/Platform_Components
Speaking of Etoys - that 0.86 page lists 4.0.2206, whereas the actual
Etoys version in the 0.86 release was 4.0.2319 (and
(Repost due to subscribers-only policy on sugar-devel)
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 12:53:48PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Please note that comparing the list of missing dependencies provided
by Michael Stone with the components listed in the Sugar
Platform page, only EToys is missing.
That's
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 03:02:15PM +0100, Sascha Silbe wrote:
(Repost due to subscribers-only policy on sugar-devel)
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 12:53:48PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Please note that comparing the list of missing dependencies
provided by Michael Stone with the components
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 05:37:44PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 03:02:15PM +0100, Sascha Silbe wrote:
(Repost due to subscribers-only policy on sugar-devel)
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 12:53:48PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Please note that comparing the list of
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 05:37:44PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 03:02:15PM +0100, Sascha Silbe wrote:
Once 0install support gets merged, Sugar Platform should be enhanced to
include build tools (autocrap, c(++) compiler, ...); in that case,
activity authors can also
14 matches
Mail list logo
