A good point - now's an excellent time to start using it. it can be used
for a soft interaction -- a warning on installation if the activity might
not be compatible.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 1:32 AM, Christoph Derndorfer
christoph.derndor...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I was wondering whether
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 08:35, Samuel Kleinmeta...@gmail.com wrote:
A good point - now's an excellent time to start using it. it can be used
for a soft interaction -- a warning on installation if the activity might
not be compatible.
Sounds good, someone would like to champion this idea by
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 08:35, Samuel Kleinmeta...@gmail.com wrote:
A good point - now's an excellent time to start using it. it can be used
for a soft interaction -- a warning on installation if the activity might
Hi all,
I was wondering whether there were any plans to make use of the hosts
variable in the activity.info files to determine whether an activity runs on
the specific Sugar installation.
With 0.86 being on the horizont, 0.84 being used on SoaS, 0.82 being widely
used among the G1G1 community
4 matches
Mail list logo
