On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 04:06, Gary C Martin wrote:
> On 5 Aug 2009, at 01:53, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
>
>> Eben Eliason wrote:
>>>
>>> I
>>> still kind of like "likes" as the prompt, but something more general
>>> like "profile" could also work.
>>
>> I think Facebook's solution is very elegant
On 5 Aug 2009, at 01:53, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
> Eben Eliason wrote:
>> I
>> still kind of like "likes" as the prompt, but something more general
>> like "profile" could also work.
>
> I think Facebook's solution is very elegant here. Their status
> messages
> are simply prepended with y
Eben Eliason wrote:
> I
> still kind of like "likes" as the prompt, but something more general
> like "profile" could also work.
I think Facebook's solution is very elegant here. Their status messages
are simply prepended with your name, typeset differently from the body
text. You can use this
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Benjamin M.
Schwartz wrote:
> Gary C Martin wrote:
>> Mock-ups amended, they now show self tags in the secondary palette area:
>>
>> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Design_Team/Proposals/Buddy_Tags
>
> Why are we calling this section "tags"?
>
> When I look at the
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Gary C Martin wrote:
> On 4 Aug 2009, at 03:16, Gary C Martin wrote:
>
>>> The palette, on the other hand, doesn't work as you've mocked it up.
>>> The primary palette is a fixed height, and only supports single line
>>> primary and secondary titles. I think the tags
Gary C Martin wrote:
> Mock-ups amended, they now show self tags in the secondary palette area:
>
> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Design_Team/Proposals/Buddy_Tags
Why are we calling this section "tags"?
When I look at these mockups, I see a perfect illustration of a "buddy
profile" [1], lik
On 4 Aug 2009, at 03:16, Gary C Martin wrote:
>> The palette, on the other hand, doesn't work as you've mocked it up.
>> The primary palette is a fixed height, and only supports single line
>> primary and secondary titles. I think the tags/description belong in
>> the secondary palette instead. Se
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Gary C Martin wrote:
> On 4 Aug 2009, at 04:54, Eben Eliason wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:16 PM, Gary C Martin
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Eben,
>>>
>>> On 4 Aug 2009, at 02:19, Eben Eliason wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Gary C Martin
wrote:
On 4 Aug 2009, at 04:54, Eben Eliason wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:16 PM, Gary C Martin
> wrote:
>> Hi Eben,
>>
>> On 4 Aug 2009, at 02:19, Eben Eliason wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Gary C
>>> Martin wrote:
On 2 Aug 2009, at 15:00, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 21:39, Gary C Martin wrote:
> On 2 Aug 2009, at 15:00, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>
>> Hi Gary (and others),
>>
>> what was decided about buddy tagging?
>
> No one else has commented yet :-(
Doesn't hurt pinging people, sometimes one doesn't reply because
thinks someone else will d
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Benjamin M. Schwartz <
bmsch...@fas.harvard.edu> wrote:
> Eben Eliason wrote:
> > I suppose there's no ridding of 'Logout",
> > "Restart", and "Shutdown". =)
>
> These all seem to be options related to control of the machine, not the
> user. I think a frame device
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 12:00:56AM -0400, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
> These all seem to be options related to control of the machine, not the
> user. I think a frame device would be preferable here. These controls,
> remember, were placed on the user's XO-icon before the advent of frame
> devic
Eben Eliason wrote:
> I suppose there's no ridding of 'Logout",
> "Restart", and "Shutdown". =)
These all seem to be options related to control of the machine, not the
user. I think a frame device would be preferable here. These controls,
remember, were placed on the user's XO-icon before the ad
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:16 PM, Gary C Martin wrote:
> Hi Eben,
>
> On 4 Aug 2009, at 02:19, Eben Eliason wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Gary C Martin wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2 Aug 2009, at 15:00, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>>>
Hi Gary (and others),
what was decided about buddy tagg
Hi Eben,
On 4 Aug 2009, at 02:19, Eben Eliason wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Gary C Martin
> wrote:
>> On 2 Aug 2009, at 15:00, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Gary (and others),
>>>
>>> what was decided about buddy tagging?
>>
>> No one else has commented yet :-(
>
> I had a brief con
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Gary C Martin wrote:
> On 2 Aug 2009, at 15:00, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>
>> Hi Gary (and others),
>>
>> what was decided about buddy tagging?
>
> No one else has commented yet :-(
I had a brief conversation with Christian about this recently. He said
he'd try to catch
On 2 Aug 2009, at 15:00, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> Hi Gary (and others),
>
> what was decided about buddy tagging?
No one else has commented yet :-(
> Were you interested in working on it?
Yes, I've just added some new mock-ups (keeping them as simple/
achievable as possible), so maybe someone els
Hi Gary (and others),
what was decided about buddy tagging? Were you interested in working on it?
>From the last Sugar releases tags are broadcasted along the rest of
the buddy info when using gabble. Was it decided that we also needed
tags in Salut for 0.86? Or it could come in a later stage?
R
18 matches
Mail list logo
