On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 06:05, Daniel Draked...@laptop.org wrote:
2009/7/29 Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com:
Daniel, could you start the ball rolling by being more explicit about
some specific unmet needs of deployments that might be actionable?
OK, where should we make such a list?
For what it is worth, it is easy enough to add activities to the
Fedora SoaS;
I don't doubt that. But at this stage I'm only looking at what is
already packaged. TamTam does not seem to be packaged by Fedora or
Ubuntu.
presumably you'll be doing a local replication of
your image?
I am
On 28.07.2009, at 07:22, Martin Dengler wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 03:24:13PM +0545, Daniel Drake wrote:
However, I feel like it could be better if the community (who I
might even stretch to call customers) could have more influence.
[...] What are the options for the community having
quoting Tomeu from another thread (with no bad feelings at all):
Sugar Labs has currently no resources to focus on anything, it
depends on volunteers doing whatever they want. I chose to spend my
time to make easier for more people to bring their knowledge and
experience to Sugar and the
[adding IAEP to cc]
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:39, Daniel Draked...@laptop.org wrote:
quoting Tomeu from another thread (with no bad feelings at all):
Sugar Labs has currently no resources to focus on anything, it
depends on volunteers doing whatever they want. I chose to spend my
time to
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 03:24:13PM +0545, Daniel Drake wrote:
However, I feel like it could be better if the community (who I
might even stretch to call customers) could have more influence.
[...] What are the options for the community having more of an
influence here?
Influence on whom?
Great thread!
Personally I feel very heard by the development team.
I personally don't hear the voice of the XO deployments saying what is
needed for them. I admit i have limited time and so I focus on things that
are relevent to SoaS but I still would have expected to be interacting with
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 14:43, Bastienbastiengue...@googlemail.com wrote:
Caroline Meeks solutiongr...@gmail.com writes:
I personally don't hear the voice of the XO deployments saying what is
needed for them.
When I was in Haiti, being able to interact with Greg was really
helpful. I knew
Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org writes:
About having a person at every deployment, some months ago I started
creating this list of contacts:
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Deployment_Team/Places
Thanks for the reminder. My idea was more to have only *one* person in
Sugar responsible to
Bastien bastiengue...@googlemail.com writes:
Greg was answering requests from various horizons (cc'ing Greg to this
thread.)
(Oops, I forgot to Cc Greg, sorry!)
--
Bastien
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 14:58, Bastienbastiengue...@googlemail.com wrote:
Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org writes:
About having a person at every deployment, some months ago I started
creating this list of contacts:
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Deployment_Team/Places
Thanks for the
al
can link to them from some Roadmap creation page. We may be further
along than we think.
HTHs. Comments, corrections and additions welcome.
Thanks,
Greg S
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 20:58:04 +0800
From: Bastien bastiengue...@googlemail.com
Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] community influence
. Comments, corrections and additions welcome.
Thanks,
Greg S
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 20:58:04 +0800
From: Bastien bastiengue...@googlemail.com
Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] community influence on development
To: Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org
Cc: sugar-devel sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
2009/7/28 Philippe Clérié phili...@gcal.net:
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 04:48:25 Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
Yes, if deployers make very clear what is a priority for them and
do so in a compelling way, I'm sure volunteer developers will
make their plans accordingly.
Perhaps the highest priority should
Apologies for jumping back to the beginning of the thread. Daniel
makes some good point here on a theme that have been raised repeatedly
over the lifetimes of both the Sugar project and OLPC.
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 5:39 AM, Daniel Draked...@laptop.org wrote:
quoting Tomeu from another thread
2009/7/28 Philippe Clérié phili...@gcal.net:
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 04:48:25 Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
Perhaps the highest priority should be a Live CD/USB that is easily
and reliably installable on the hard disk of a machine. I've now
tried strawberry and Sugar on Fedora and neither is
16 matches
Mail list logo
