On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 06:04:29PM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> Look, there are other veteran programmers who seem to be frustrated by
> our current build system:
>
> http://marcopg.org/2011/09/06/building-sugar-from-git-on-f15/
btw, if you will extend this example taking care about several
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 06:21:53PM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
>
> ...
>
> 3. Sweets tried to build csound-python from sources even though there's
> a distro package for it. Moreover, the build fails on x86_64 due to a
> missing -fPIC. Installing the package manually with apt fixed the issue.
>
On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 18:47 +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote:
> Excerpts from Bernie Innocenti's message of 2011-10-01 00:04:29 +0200:
>
> > Look, there are other veteran programmers who seem to be frustrated by
> > our current build system:
> >
> > http://marcopg.org/2011/09/06/building-sugar-from-gi
Excerpts from Bernie Innocenti's message of 2011-10-01 00:04:29 +0200:
> Look, there are other veteran programmers who seem to be frustrated by
> our current build system:
>
> http://marcopg.org/2011/09/06/building-sugar-from-git-on-f15/
Unfortunately Marco didn't bother to file a ticket or ev
Excerpts from Bernie Innocenti's message of 2011-09-29 04:35:55 +0200:
> I was reading in the Gnome 3.2 release notes:
[...]
By using the very latest upstream JHbuild from git we not only get their
latest breakages (that were introduced by exactly the new feature you
mention), but also the benef
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 06:04:29PM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 13:33 +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
>
> > Actually, I don't see any principal difference between Sweets approach
> > and using "sudo ./install-deps.sh". To have bulletproof Install-deps.sh,
> > we either need to
On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 13:33 +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> Actually, I don't see any principal difference between Sweets approach
> and using "sudo ./install-deps.sh". To have bulletproof Install-deps.sh,
> we either need to support only one distro (and maybe only one its
> release), or I don't see a
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:17:42PM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 23:30 +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> > PK is a critical component in Sweets. It is pretty simple, if Sugar
> > ecosystem is not about "only-one-distro(put here your favorite)", then
> > we either need to reuse
On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 23:30 +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> Firstly, the difference I pointed is that a flexibility of using
> Sweets in comparing jhbuild to code sugar, i.e., jhbuild is a black
> box supported in a separate project that covers the full sugar related
> infra at once. At the same time
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 06:21:53PM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 12:07 +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:35:55PM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> > > I was reading in the Gnome 3.2 release notes:
> > >
> > > --
On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 12:07 +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:35:55PM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> > I was reading in the Gnome 3.2 release notes:
> >
> >
> > GNOME's build tool JHBuild does not build
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:35:55PM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> I was reading in the Gnome 3.2 release notes:
>
>
> GNOME's build tool JHBuild does not build a module anymore if the
> version installed on your system is r
I was reading in the Gnome 3.2 release notes:
GNOME's build tool JHBuild does not build a module anymore if the
version installed on your system is recent enough. This is controlled by
the configuration option partial_build a
13 matches
Mail list logo
