On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 06:56, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> On 12/07/2009 11:39 AM, Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 10:11, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>>> Yes, I think it makes sense to control settings via gconf - this should
>>> be our standard way.
>>
>> Isn't Gnome thinking
On 12/07/2009 11:39 AM, Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 10:11, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>> Yes, I think it makes sense to control settings via gconf - this should
>> be our standard way.
>
> Isn't Gnome thinking about dropping GConf ? (in favor of DCconf as far
> as I unde
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 10:11, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> Yes, I think it makes sense to control settings via gconf - this should
> be our standard way.
Isn't Gnome thinking about dropping GConf ? (in favor of DCconf as far
as I understood)
I'd be worried about using a technology that upstream is
On 12/06/2009 10:19 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> 2009/11/25 Daniel Drake:
> [snip]
>>
>> Customizing browse homepage
>> The procedure to do this is too complicated for most deployments, and is
>> undocumented.
>>
>> Customizing which activities are in the favourites view by default
>> You can do this
2009/11/25 Daniel Drake :
[snip]
>
> Customizing browse homepage
> The procedure to do this is too complicated for most deployments, and is
> undocumented.
>
> Customizing which activities are in the favourites view by default
> You can do this just by editing a file, but that file is a part of the
5 matches
Mail list logo