I think upstream should definitely include all the translations. It's up to
distributions to exclude some languages if they want to... It's even
supported by image composing tools usually, I think.
I posted pull requests to modernize our setup to use LINGUAS, add the
missing translations and
Thanks!
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
I think upstream should definitely include all the translations. It's up
to distributions to exclude some languages if they want to... It's even
supported by image composing tools usually, I think.
I posted
dnarvaez,
Any idea about what should we do with this?
Gonzalo
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.orgwrote:
Yes, but is not a problem in the rpm, but in the sources repository.
Gonzalo
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 8:15 PM, Jerry Vonau m...@jvonau.ca wrote:
The
I think was done to preserve space.
Not sure if that is a concern now.
Gonzalo
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 8:43 PM, me m...@jvonau.ca wrote:
Hi All:
I'm wondering if there is any reason why there are po files generated for
the source in git, these are included as .mo files in the src rpm, but
Just wondering how AU is reacting without having the correct spelling for
'favourites', 'neighbourhood' that comes with en_BR. This is a regression
from DX4 that included such support. It would be better would really
support en_AU thou.
just my thoughts,
Jerry
On March 26, 2014 at 6:59 AM
Honestly, they didn't complained yet.
Thanks for pointing that.
Gonzalo
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Jerry Vonau m...@jvonau.ca wrote:
Just wondering how AU is reacting without having the correct spelling for
'favourites', 'neighbourhood' that comes with en_BR. This is a regression
I believe AU makes their own build with en_GB.
cjl
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Jerry Vonau m...@jvonau.ca wrote:
Just wondering how AU is reacting without having the correct spelling for
'favourites', 'neighbourhood' that comes with en_BR. This is a regression
from DX4 that included
http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/4743
Jerry
On March 26, 2014 at 8:48 AM Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org
wrote:
Honestly, they didn't complained yet.
Thanks for pointing that.
Gonzalo
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Jerry Vonau m...@jvonau.ca wrote:
Just wondering how AU is
We included en_AU, but not en_GB.
Will be in the next image.
Gonzalo
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Chris Leonard cjlhomeaddr...@gmail.comwrote:
I believe AU makes their own build with en_GB.
cjl
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Jerry Vonau m...@jvonau.ca wrote:
Just wondering how
They did when DX4 was used, not now.
Jerry
On March 26, 2014 at 8:59 AM Chris Leonard cjlhomeaddr...@gmail.com
wrote:
I believe AU makes their own build with en_GB.
cjl
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Jerry Vonau m...@jvonau.ca wrote:
Just wondering how AU is reacting without having
That is strange, I don't see en_AU's translation file when extracting the
files from the released rpm[1]. The src[2] rpm's tar file only lists en_GB
and en_USA, but those are not in the released rpm and not en_AU at all.
Jerry
1.
There are not en_AU in http://translate.sugarlabs.org/ neither.
Maybe was just en_GB?
Gonzalo
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Jerry Vonau m...@jvonau.ca wrote:
That is strange, I don't see en_AU's translation file when extracting the
files from the released rpm[1]. The src[2] rpm's tar file
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 7:59 AM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.orgwrote:
I think was done to preserve space.
Not sure if that is a concern now.
Yep. It was definitely a concern for XO-1 and for XO-1.5 images for 2GB
machines.
m
--
martin.langh...@gmail.com
- ask interesting
We do not have an en_AU language project in Pootle, so that does not
surprise me.
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Jerry Vonau m...@jvonau.ca wrote:
That is strange, I don't see en_AU's translation file when extracting the
files from the released rpm[1]. The src[2] rpm's tar file only lists
I know there is no translations for en_AU in Pootle therefore not in sugar,
but en_GB was used in the past as a substitute for this shortcoming. There
are languages in Pootle that form the source tar file that becomes part of
the source rpm, however the resulting installable rpm doesn't ship all
Looks like we need a file po/LINGUAS
Anybody have a idea about why we don't have one?
Gonzalo
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.orgwrote:
Maybe the reason is we don't have en_GB in the variable ALL_LINGUAS in the
Makefile.in
in sugar/po directory.
In my
Maybe the reason is we don't have en_GB in the variable ALL_LINGUAS in the
Makefile.in
in sugar/po directory.
In my system:
* we have a file en_GB.po sugar-build/sugar/po/
* the file is not copied
in sugar-build/build/out/install/share/locale/en_GB/LC_MESSAGES
not sure how Makefile.in is
The hint was given in the initial email, alter ALL_LINGUAS= in
/configure.ac
Jerry
On March 26, 2014 at 1:27 PM Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org
wrote:
Maybe the reason is we don't have en_GB in the variable ALL_LINGUAS in
the
Makefile.in
in sugar/po directory.
In my system:
* we
Yes, but is not a problem in the rpm, but in the sources repository.
Gonzalo
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 8:15 PM, Jerry Vonau m...@jvonau.ca wrote:
The hint was given in the initial email, alter ALL_LINGUAS= in
/configure.ac
Jerry
On March 26, 2014 at 1:27 PM Gonzalo Odiard
19 matches
Mail list logo
