Re: [Sugar-devel] [Activity-Team] Request to review GSoC Proposal

Hi On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 11:37 AM, Tony Anderson wrote: > As always, the question is the impact on our users. The traditional source > of information for users is http://www.sugarlabs.org and > http://www.laptop.org and, especially the wiki pages. The traditional > source

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Activity-Team] Request to review GSoC Proposal

As always, the question is the impact on our users. The traditional source of information for users is http://www.sugarlabs.org and http://www.laptop.org and, especially the wiki pages. The traditional source for activities is http://activities.sugarlabs.org (ASLO). So far the effect of gitHub

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Activity-Team] Request to review GSoC Proposal

My assessment of project impact; Originally documentation was separate because we had non-coding developers and tool chains that varied by type of developer. Now we use GitHub the tool chains are combined. With the project as described, documentation will be concentrated in the source code

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Activity-Team] Request to review GSoC Proposal

Can you provide a link to your proposal please? I do not have access to the Google GSoC website for Sugar Labs. -- James Cameron http://quozl.netrek.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org