On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 10:00:40AM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
Thou all this people aren't really children. Was there some rationale
behind using very large icons with children age 6-12? It's not like they
have worse vision than adults.
I don't recall, sorry.
--
James Cameron
El Fri, 04-06-2010 a las 11:00 +1000, James Cameron escribió:
Does this change fix the bug?
No. (But it does fix the size of icons in the activity ring).
BTW, a lot of testers told me that they like the small toolbar icons of
the 72dpi mode more than the old big ones. I also think it
Bernie
72 dpi icons looked good to me
Maybe the logic of big icons was not eyesight but touchpad control?
Though the target audience of the XO builds is still children 6-12, it
doesnt have to restrict the audience of other Sugar builds. Sugarlabs
can have a wider mission than OLPC.
There
El Sun, 13-06-2010 a las 08:40 +1000, fors...@ozonline.com.au escribió:
72 dpi icons looked good to me
Maybe the logic of big icons was not eyesight but touchpad control?
Though the target audience of the XO builds is still children 6-12, it
doesnt have to restrict the audience of other
Hi guys,
On 12 Jun 2010, at 23:53, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
El Sun, 13-06-2010 a las 08:40 +1000, fors...@ozonline.com.au escribió:
72 dpi icons looked good to me
Maybe the logic of big icons was not eyesight but touchpad control?
Though the target audience of the XO builds is still
El Tue, 08-06-2010 a las 13:21 +1000, fors...@ozonline.com.au escribió:
OS 240py XO-1
Though I cannot see any way to create tabs in browse, sometimes clicking
links in frames creates tabs which behave erratically eg zero width tab
I'm not sure what this is and I don't really have the time to look into it atm.
Browse is in a difficult situation because hulahop, pywebkitgtk and
webkitgtk+PyGI all have hazy futures. Over the summer I'll try and get
Browse in a better situation (the plan so far is a thin abstraction
layer).
El Tue, 08-06-2010 a las 16:13 +0100, Lucian Branescu escribió:
I'm not sure what this is and I don't really have the time to look into it
atm.
Browse is in a difficult situation because hulahop, pywebkitgtk and
webkitgtk+PyGI all have hazy futures. Over the summer I'll try and get
Browse
OS 240py XO-1
Though I cannot see any way to create tabs in browse, sometimes clicking links
in frames creates tabs which behave erratically eg zero width tab
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/images/e/ec/Screenshot_of_Browse_0s240py_.png
Tony
___
El Sat, 29-05-2010 a las 19:19 +1000, fors...@ozonline.com.au escribió:
os240py
font in Write is small and text does not fill the screen width
Please, try editing /usr/bin/sugar to force SUGAR_SCALING=100.
Does this change fix the bug?
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 08:27:09PM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
El Sat, 29-05-2010 a las 19:19 +1000, fors...@ozonline.com.au escribi??:
os240py
font in Write is small and text does not fill the screen width
Please, try editing /usr/bin/sugar to force SUGAR_SCALING=100.
Tested.
El Fri, 28-05-2010 a las 21:16 +1000, fors...@ozonline.com.au escribió:
bugs os240py
Activities sometimes launch and stay in a window (seen with paint and turtle
blocks)
but not happening today more frequently the window appears only for a
fraction of a
second at launch (with scratch and
El Sat, 29-05-2010 a las 11:20 +1000, fors...@ozonline.com.au escribió:
os240py
Measure sometimes locks up on recording a waveform, quitting from frame
then brings up metacity dialog activity is not responding Dont think
there was any error log.
I've never seen this happen myself... Can you
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Tim McNamara
paperl...@timmcnamara.co.nz wrote:
On 26 May 2010 06:16, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org
wrote:
Hello everyone,
we've just started a new development cycle aimed
On 26 May 2010 06:16, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org
wrote:
Hello everyone,
we've just started a new development cycle aimed at providing Sugar 0.88
for the XO-1. Our focus is stability and usability for
CentOS ?
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Tim McNamara
paperl...@timmcnamara.co.nzwrote:
On 26 May 2010 06:16, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org
wrote:
Hello everyone,
we've just started a new development
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 12:19 AM, Tim McNamara
paperl...@timmcnamara.co.nz wrote:
On 26 May 2010 06:16, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org
wrote:
Hello everyone,
we've just started a new development cycle aimed
os240py
font in Write is small and text does not fill the screen width
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
bugs os240py
Activities sometimes launch and stay in a window (seen with paint and turtle
blocks) but not happening today
more frequently the window appears only for a fraction of a second at launch
(with scratch and abacus the window is visible for half a second or so)
and
Pippy always
os240py
Measure sometimes locks up on recording a waveform, quitting from frame then
brings up metacity dialog activity is not responding Dont think there was any
error log.
more on delayed or absent pulsing start icon and activities starting in window:
i suspect the two may be related, on
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 23:12, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
El Tue, 25-05-2010 a las 19:16 +0100, Peter Robinson escribió:
Is F-11 still the base OS for this?
Unfortunately, this build is still based on
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@tomeuvizoso.net wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 23:12, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
El Tue, 25-05-2010 a las 19:16 +0100, Peter Robinson escribió:
Is
El Wed, 26-05-2010 a las 09:29 +0100, Peter Robinson escribió:
I'm happy to hear this. F14 may bring interesting changes for the XO1,
can we hope that support for the Geode won't have been dropped by
then?
There was a bug report [1] that was filed about it to do with glibc.
Since I last
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
El Wed, 26-05-2010 a las 09:29 +0100, Peter Robinson escribió:
I'm happy to hear this. F14 may bring interesting changes for the XO1,
can we hope that support for the Geode won't have been dropped by
then?
There
Hi,
TBH I don't know what changed between F-12 and F-13. It wasn't
the compile flag changes as I checked them so I'm wondering
wondering why its suddenly a problem.
gcc changed; it started emitting NOPL instructions under i686.
- Chris.
--
Chris Ball c...@laptop.org
One Laptop
On 25 May 2010 18:12, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
That's not entirely true. The was no changes in CPU support from F-12
to F-13. What has happened was a change in gcc which causes issues
with F-13 on geode processors. There's a bit missing from gcc for
geode support that would
El Wed, 26-05-2010 a las 12:00 -0300, Daniel Drake escribió:
As has been pointed out, there is some kernel code floating around
that is working in this direction. However, it's not totally correct
and the kernel developers want a more generic system rather than
something Geode-specific. And
On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 12:25 -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
Hello everyone,
we've just started a new development cycle aimed at providing Sugar 0.88
for the XO-1. Our focus is stability and usability for deployments,
although we're also attempting to merge a couple of low-risk features
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
Hello everyone,
we've just started a new development cycle aimed at providing Sugar 0.88
for the XO-1. Our focus is stability and usability for deployments,
although we're also attempting to merge a couple of low-risk
On 05/25/2010 08:16 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Bernie Innocentiber...@codewiz.org wrote:
Hello everyone,
we've just started a new development cycle aimed at providing Sugar 0.88
for the XO-1. Our focus is stability and usability for deployments,
although
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
On 05/25/2010 08:16 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Bernie Innocentiber...@codewiz.org
wrote:
Hello everyone,
we've just started a new development cycle aimed at providing Sugar 0.88
El Tue, 25-05-2010 a las 19:16 +0100, Peter Robinson escribió:
Is F-11 still the base OS for this?
Unfortunately, this build is still based on Fedora 11.
Fedora 13 dropped support for the Geode processor, so it's not an
option. Upgrading to Fedora 12 would be possible, but there are unsolved
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
El Tue, 25-05-2010 a las 19:16 +0100, Peter Robinson escribió:
Is F-11 still the base OS for this?
Unfortunately, this build is still based on Fedora 11.
Fedora 13 dropped support for the Geode processor, so it's
33 matches
Mail list logo
