Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Versioning (Was Re: [RELEASE] Terminal v24)

2009-03-19 Thread Wade Brainerd
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 18:34, Wade Brainerd wad...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Eben Eliason e...@laptop.org wrote: On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Wade Brainerd wad...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Versioning (Was Re: [RELEASE] Terminal v24)

2009-03-13 Thread David Farning
One project to look for on how to handle activity versions is eclipse. The notion of the eclipse plug-in ecosystem is virtually the same as it is in Sugar Labs. Eclipse has a few years of struggling with this issue under their belt.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Versioning (Was Re: [RELEASE] Terminal v24)

2009-03-11 Thread Wade Brainerd
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 17:00, Eben Eliason e...@laptop.org wrote: Here is some (OK, a lot) of background reading on the subject.  I still cast my vote for a major/minor distinction, as mentioned in my response on the

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Versioning (Was Re: [RELEASE] Terminal v24)

2009-03-11 Thread Eben Eliason
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Wade Brainerd wad...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 17:00, Eben Eliason e...@laptop.org wrote: Here is some (OK, a lot) of background reading on the subject.  I still cast my

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Versioning (Was Re: [RELEASE] Terminal v24)

2009-03-11 Thread Wade Brainerd
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Eben Eliason e...@laptop.org wrote: On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Wade Brainerd wad...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 17:00, Eben Eliason e...@laptop.org wrote: Here is some