Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [Pkg-sugar-devel] sugar is marked for autoremoval from testing

2016-06-24 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Tony Anderson (2016-06-24 13:13:57) > I subscribed to the list because there seemed to be a lot of sugar > activity. I appreciate your interest. > I have been dismayed by the frequent threats to drop Sugar or a > critical component. At one point, the messages suggested that the >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [Pkg-sugar-devel] sugar is marked for autoremoval from testing

2016-06-24 Thread Tony Anderson
Thanks for the reply. I subscribed to the list because there seemed to be a lot of sugar activity. I have been dismayed by the frequent threats to drop Sugar or a critical component. At one point, the messages suggested that the automated testing scripts could not even read the license text at

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [Pkg-sugar-devel] sugar is marked for autoremoval from testing

2016-06-24 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Hi Tony! First of all: Thanks for your interest in Debian packaging of Sugar! Quoting Tony Anderson (2016-06-24 08:25:07) > Does anyone know what this is all about? How has Debian packaged Sugar > in one package? > What is the difference, if any, between 0.106 as released and 0.106.1-1? > Does