Re: [Sugar-devel] Porting to Python 3: GSoC 2019

Thanks for the review. I'll continue working on the list. On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 9:12 PM Tony Anderson wrote: > This 'ideas list' is hard to follow: > > The criteria are excellent. Howver there appears to be only one idea, not > a list. > > The idea is to port Sugar to Python 3 - this seems to

Re: [Sugar-devel] Porting to Python 3: GSoC 2019

This 'ideas list' is hard to follow: The criteria are excellent. Howver there appears to be only one idea, not a list. The idea is to port Sugar to Python 3 - this seems to be a necessity -not an idea. However, the description seems to limit this idea to porting only the telepathy interface

Re: [Sugar-devel] Porting to Python 3: GSoC 2019

This is great pro panda! Will soon add more ideas to it. On Mon, 31 Dec 2018, 7:04 pm Rahul Bothra, wrote: > Hi Ravi, > > Thank you for showing your interest in participating in GSoC with Sugar > Labs. > > On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 2:18 PM Ravi Teja wrote: > > I went through the newly created ide

Re: [Sugar-devel] Porting to Python 3: GSoC 2019

Hi Ravi, Thank you for showing your interest in participating in GSoC with Sugar Labs. On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 2:18 PM Ravi Teja wrote: > I went through the newly created ideas list here . That's great. We'll be adding in more ideas s