Hi Aleksey others,
just a quick note on the Feature process.
This feature does not change or add new UI but is a huge change on the
workflow. In these cases you should add the [DESIGN] flag, too. While
thinking about it, I guess we nearly need design team feedback on all
Features... ;) Eben
On 11/30/2009 08:54 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
2009/11/30 Walter Benderwalter.ben...@gmail.com:
This isn't quite accurate. We've been adding some pre-loaded content
to the Journal for quite some time now,
Are you sure? Or are you referring to a manual process that you do in
certain deployments?
On 12/03/2009 06:23 AM, Eben Eliason wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:54 AM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 9:40 PM, Wade Brainerdwad...@gmail.com wrote:
When deleting an object from the Journal that is an activity bundle,
we ought to display an
On 12/03/2009 06:37 AM, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On a more general note, this discussion has many hints of the
action/object views that have been tossed around for some time now.
This specifically addressed the conflict between the desire to manage
all objects and the desire to have the Journal
The press release was completed last night!
Can anyone help with German and Dutch?
We hope to get these up during the day Monday, and send to our
press/education contacts mailing list on Tuesday when PR Newswire will
carry it in English
thanks!
Sean
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 11:56 PM, Sean DALY
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 01:41:17PM +0100, Sascha Silbe wrote:
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 01:17:49PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote:
[Debian]
could it be that 2.5 is only the default and that it is fine for a
package to depend on python 2.6?
No, that's not the case. Python 2.6 is only available in
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
On os34, if I
Filed it as http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/9657 - can't find anything on
this topic on the SL trac; apparently the
Hi all,
I've created a stub feature page[1] for actions metaphor.
Could someone, who are original initiators(or have ideas) of this
feature, tweak wiki page to cover all workflows that they have
in mind for Actions in Journal.
[1] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Actions
--
Aleksey
Hi all,
This post is not about particular feature but about proposed
to 0.88 features that can be composited to one set. Some of them
could be implemented in 0.88 partially, some are invasive, some not.
We lost possibility to push several such features in 0.86 and we have
a chance to do it once
(oops, wrong subject)
Hi all,
This post is not about particular feature but about proposed
to 0.88 features that can be composited to one set. Some of them
could be implemented in 0.88 partially, some are invasive, some not.
We lost possibility to push several such features in 0.86 and we have
..to continue summarising..
In fact, all proposed features are not about increasing complexity
but about decreasing for floor level - user all time works with sugar
objects(activities, activity objects, foreign object etc) but from
different views. And let developers/deployments/teachers
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 04:38:56PM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 30.11.2009, at 21:24, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 30.11.2009, at 20:02, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 07:49:15PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote:
On 11/30/2009 10:00 AM, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On
Hi,
We are pleased to announce the new release of Foodforce2 game which we are
naming as the first stable release version after the successful launch of
beta earlier in the year. Thanks for all the love and support accorded to
the beta version with more than 113 thousand downloads from the Google
13 matches
Mail list logo
