On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 1:15 AM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 15:27 +1100, Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote:
What is the status of HTML5 video support in Browse? I'm using version
108.4. Testing with the videos linked from
http://double.co.nz/video_test/, most don't
FYI
- Bert -
Begin forwarded message:
From: W. Michael Petullo m...@flyn.org
Date: 18. Januar 2011 04:14:26 MEZ
To: Amos Blanton a...@scratch.mit.edu
Cc: Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de, li...@scratch.mit.edu, Sayamindu
Dasgupta sayami...@media.mit.edu
Subject: Re: [Scratch]
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:34:34PM -0500, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 17:11 -0500, Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero wrote:
I can't. I think every maintainer must do the change.
Right every maintainer has to make that change in ASLO.
Aren't you an
From: root root@ubuntu.(none)
1)Icon converted to plain svg format
Signed-off-by: Mukesh Gupta mukeshgupta.2...@gmail.com
---
icons/scalable/device/Makefile.am |1 +
icons/scalable/device/feedback-icon.svg | 378 +++
2 files changed, 379 insertions(+), 0
Thanks.
I was talking with Gary about working in the Record UI.
We must work in this for F14 version
Gonzalo
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 1:00 AM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.orgwrote:
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 22:51 -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
If you come up with a patch, we'll
On a dual-boot XO, does it make sense to use the same binary code for sugar
activities also in gnome applications? If so, are there guidelines or
example acti-plications?
If the same binary code is *not *re-used by both platforms, but just the
same code base, are there guidelines or examples of
On 18 January 2011 13:06, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
Also, in my mind, ASLO is primarily a doer/user tool, so ASLO editors
should not change existed uploads in the way they think is needed.
I guess this means that my usage of activities.sugarlabs.org is not
according to its
On 18.01.2011, at 18:41, Erik Blankinship wrote:
On a dual-boot XO, does it make sense to use the same binary code for sugar
activities also in gnome applications? If so, are there guidelines or
example acti-plications?
I think it makes a lot of sense. That's one of the reasons the Etoys
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Erik Blankinship er...@mediamods.com wrote:
On a dual-boot XO, does it make sense to use the same binary code for sugar
activities also in gnome applications? If so, are there guidelines or
example acti-plications?
The gnome side will most likely be installed
The gnome side will most likely be installed via RPMs (or .deb files
on Ubuntu/Fedora setups). So your Sugar app could just use the
libraries, binaries and resources/assets from the RPM.
Examples - Write.xo uses the Abiword libraries. Browse.xo uses
xulrunner (the Firefox libraries
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 05:48:05PM +, Daniel Drake wrote:
On 18 January 2011 13:06, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
Also, in my mind, ASLO is primarily a doer/user tool, so ASLO editors
should not change existed uploads in the way they think is needed.
I guess this means that
On 18 January 2011 19:58, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
You can either do not use appVersion and update-aslo.php will return
recent versions or just create collection. The activity-testing.sl.o
implementation allows setting particular activity versions (it will be
pushed to
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 20:32 +, Daniel Drake wrote:
If I use a collection, the versions are fixed to the exact versions
that I add to the collection, whereas (see last mail) I want the
latest activity version compatible with Sugar-0.90.
(please correct me if I've misunderstood what a
On 18 January 2011 22:00, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
This wasn't considered good for deployments enough because it doesn't
allow the pedagogical team to do any QA on updates before they hit the
users.
Agreed. This is not for deployments, this is for development.
The downside
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 05:00:07PM -0500, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 20:32 +, Daniel Drake wrote:
If I use a collection, the versions are fixed to the exact versions
that I add to the collection, whereas (see last mail) I want the
latest activity version compatible
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 22:06 +, Daniel Drake wrote:
Perhaps we could add separate microformat URLs that
filter by Sugar version.
This would be good, but is basically what we have now in a different format:
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 09:07:32PM +, Daniel Drake wrote:
Hi,
According to activities.sugarlabs.org, the following activities
(amongst others, probably) are not compatible with Sugar-0.90:
org.laptop.WebActivity
org.laptop.sugar.ReadActivity
org.laptop.TamTamSynthLab,
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Erik Blankinship er...@mediamods.com wrote:
If my acti-plication has dependencies that are not part of the underlying
build, do I need to install them on the gnome side first?
It's not technically at the gnome side... you have to install them in
the system :-)
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Erik Blankinship er...@mediamods.com
wrote:
If my acti-plication has dependencies that are not part of the underlying
build, do I need to install them on the gnome side first?
19 matches
Mail list logo
