2013/3/14 Ajay Garg a...@activitycentral.com:
Thanks a ton Manuel; I will test the patch on the weekend, and let you know
:)
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote:
Hi Ajay and other devs,
Ajay, whlie reviewing your patch for the proxy feature, I decided to
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Ajay Garg a...@activitycentral.com wrote:
For more details of the http_proxy interactions with GTK+, please see the
source-code of webkit, in particular
http://svn.webkit.org/repository/webkit/trunk/Tools/GtkLauncher/main.c
GtkLauncher is not a part of WebKit
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Anish Mangal an...@activitycentral.org wrote:
I'd like to propose Network proxy configuration in Sugar
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Proxy_configuration
I would say that this feature does not fit particularly nicely with
some items of our guidelines:
Daniel,
Your concerns are valid.
All I can say that probably using an automated transparent proxy
client-server setup is the answer, for getting the requirements met without
bothering the kids.
*
The automatic mode can be set in the XO-images, via simple OOB scripts.
*
The automatic mode puts
One problem that I have seen in various places, children untick theRadio
enable checkbox in Sugar's control panel and then return theirlaptop for
repair because they can't get online. I fear that proxyconfiguration could
become support headache like this.
Thinking in the same way, we must block
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn
alan...@hotmail.com wrote:
One problem that I have seen in various places, children untick the
Radio enable checkbox in Sugar's control panel and then return their
laptop for repair because they can't get online. I fear that proxy
While I understand your point about the radio checkbox,
this show a few bugs or fails in design in Sugar too.
Trying right now I see:
* The text is confusing:
Turn off the wireless radio to save battery life
[] Radio
Checked is on or off? What means Radio? Is not clear
* After uncheck the
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote:
About the network proxy configuration, I agree is better have a automatic
configuration _if_possible_, but there are times when is not possible,
then we should provide a solution. Has been a request for a long time,
and
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 14:35:26 -0600
From: d...@laptop.org
To: gonz...@laptop.org
CC: alan...@hotmail.com; sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org;
an...@activitycentral.com; alsr...@activitycentral.com
Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] [FEATURES][DESIGN] Network proxy configuration
On Thu, Mar 14,
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org
wrote:
About the network proxy configuration, I agree is better have a automatic
configuration _if_possible_, but there are times when is not possible,
Hi,
This discussion is making me nervous. The standard model of the XO has
been that they are connected to the internet via the school server.
Is it proposed to set up this proxy-server as a requirement for all XOs
and for the user (primary school children) to have to manage this even
when no
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote:
While I understand your point about the radio checkbox,
this show a few bugs or fails in design in Sugar too.
Trying right now I see:
* The text is confusing:
Turn off the wireless radio to save battery life
[] Radio
I think this feature (proxy-config) is useful, just as the modem-config is,
which is included now.
dsd's brings a valid questioning of whether this kind of technical
features should be included or not. I think this particular matter requires
a broader discussion about how we could conciliate
But with modem-config a child cannot stop normal operation.
With proxy, the child can stop normal operation, in that no Browse
will work with wrong proxy.
I think proxy configuration should be an optional extension that is
disabled by default, allowing a deployment to enable it.
On Thu, Mar 14,
Is it different from relying on a modem and having a wrong modem-config?
I think there are scenarios where normal includes the proper
proxy-config, otherwise browse won't work either.
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:33 PM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
But with modem-config a child cannot
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Tony Anderson tony_ander...@usa.netwrote:
Hi,
This discussion is making me nervous. The standard model of the XO has
been that they are connected to the internet via the school server.
Is it proposed to set up this proxy-server as a requirement for all XOs
I think proxy configuration should be an optional extension that is
disabled by default, allowing a deployment to enable it.
We can add a configuration to allow deployments to disable it.
Gonzalo
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Hi,
Does this mean we will need two signed images, one for the schoolserver
and one for the stand-alone XO? Until now, the default configuration has
assumed that proxy is provided by the schoolserver.
Tony
On 03/14/2013 11:17 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Tony
18 matches
Mail list logo
