Good catch. By design ordering should be preserved, so this needs fixing.
On Saturday, 18 May 2013, Aneesh Dogra wrote:
Hello list,
I was just looking over some code in bus.js and I noticed that we are
actually using a stack to prioritize and keep track of our send requests.
The array which
https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-docs/pull/12
On 13 May 2013 00:08, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
There seem to be agreement on this. I'd say the change should be effective
as soon as someone patches sugar-docs :)
On Friday, 10 May 2013, Simon Schampijer wrote:
Hi,
with
On 18 May 2013 09:21, Aneesh Dogra lionane...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Hey!
I was wondering on how would we preserve the history of sugar-html-core
repository?
See below.
*Secondly,* I guess the only thing I need to do is to make another
repository add bus.js to it and edit other
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Sugar Labs Activities
activit...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
Activity Homepage:
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4082
Sugar Platform:
0.96 - 0.100
Download Now:
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/28572/paint-58.xo
Release notes:
Remove the
https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/pull/66
A quick review would be appreciated, to unbreak the build.
On 17 May 2013 21:41, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/builders/raring-amd64-quick/builds/9/steps/shell_3/logs/stdio
config.py is autogenerated, so
I added docker to sugar-build and buildbot. The html is generated in the
out/docs directory and whenever I can get the builds to fully work again it
will be uploaded to the usual place.
We probably should replace the sidebar with a friendly index at some point,
for now I think that's good enough.
On 17 May 2013 15:13, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Simon, Manuel,
any feedback about this? I see a few possible levels
1 Everything, bugfixes included
2 Every feature patch
3 Every patch to the new html/javascript code
4 Nothing, leave it to the contributor willingness
Thanks for the fix. I see that flake8 is the one that was merged. Good.
2013/5/18 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com:
https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/pull/66
A quick review would be appreciated, to unbreak the build.
On 17 May 2013 21:41, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah. The pep8 --exclude patch is not very good, so I used pyflakes8.
On 18 May 2013 19:16, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote:
Thanks for the fix. I see that flake8 is the one that was merged. Good.
2013/5/18 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com:
2013/5/18 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com:
On 17 May 2013 15:13, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Simon, Manuel,
any feedback about this? I see a few possible levels
1 Everything, bugfixes included
2 Every feature patch
3 Every patch to the new html/javascript code
4 Nothing,
2013/5/18 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com:
I added docker to sugar-build and buildbot. The html is generated in the
out/docs directory and whenever I can get the builds to fully work again it
will be uploaded to the usual place.
We probably should replace the sidebar with a friendly index
2013/5/18 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com:
On 18 May 2013 09:21, Aneesh Dogra lionane...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Hey!
I was wondering on how would we preserve the history of sugar-html-core
repository?
See below.
Secondly, I guess the only thing I need to do is to make another
On Saturday, May 18, 2013 02:36:13 PM Manuel Quiñones wrote:
2013/5/18 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com:
On 17 May 2013 15:13, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Simon, Manuel,
any feedback about this? I see a few possible levels
1 Everything, bugfixes included
2 Every
Done.
Gonzalo
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Sugar Labs Activities
activit...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
Activity Homepage:
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4082
Sugar Platform:
0.96 - 0.100
Download
Hi,
It was mentioned in some other thread, but posting to make sure everyone
has seen it :)
We have a good start of a TODO list for html activities. If you want to get
involved this is your chance!
https://github.com/sugarlabs/roadmap/issues/8
--
Daniel Narvaez
I think we should try to make a decision on this. The situation is probably
confusing for external people. Plus there are nice things we can do with
github, like setting up the remotes automatically in sugar-build,
triggering off buildbot instantaneously without polling etc. But not being
sure
--
Daniel Narvaez
0001-Use-json-instead-of-simplejson.patch
Description: Binary data
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Thanks for your patch!
This code isn't used at the moment due some regressions with the Vte dynamic
bindings. I know it breaks the buildbot, so I applied it as
74097db3becc980b68b29b2c51a740934e85adc5
Cheers,
Daniel Francis.
___
Sugar-devel mailing
hello,
would OLPC be interested in my open-source GTK+ program that
uses the laptop to speech what has been typed in by keyboard?
My program uses gtk-3.x and the C language. it requires
espeak and vim/gvim. other than that my program helps anyone who
I don't really get what the patch [1] is intended to do? I mean I see it
deleting all the json files which specifies the packages to download.
I am sorry if I am missing something important, but the commit message
isn't enough to explain what its trying to do.
[1]:
Nevermind. I forked my repo at a very unfortunate time. The commiter forgot
to add new files. This was fixed in [1]
[2]:
https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-build/commit/f6b858ddc4608f3a03d5a62dd02c3ee8cfca9348
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Aneesh Dogra lionane...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't
Hey,
That way I can transfer the newly created sugar-html-bus [1] and
sugar-html-activity [2] to the organization's repo.
[1]: https://github.com/lionaneesh/sugar-html-bus
[2]: https://github.com/lionaneesh/sugar-html-activity
--
Thanks
Aneesh Dogra (lionaneesh)
Is it something different than [1]. Also check [2]
[1]:
https://git.sugarlabs.org/myo-sugar-activities-examples/mainline/trees/master/Adding_TTS_gtk3
[2]:
http://en.flossmanuals.net/make-your-own-sugar-activities/adding-text-to-speech/
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 7:10 AM, Gary Kline
We cannot speak for OLPC, but we do have most of the active Sugar
developers on this list. Can you tell us a bit more about your
program?
regards.
-walter
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
hello,
would OLPC be interested in my open-source
I don't know if my opinion matters, but I would also suggest 100% code
coverage.
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 07:43:24AM +0530, Aneesh Dogra wrote:
Is it something different than [1]. Also check [2]
[1]:
https://git.sugarlabs.org/myo-sugar-activities-examples/mainline/trees/master/Adding_TTS_gtk3
[2]:
hello,
would OLPC be interested in my open-source GTK+ program that
uses the laptop to speech what has been typed in by keyboard?
My program uses gtk-3.x and the C language. it requires
espeak and vim/gvim. other than that my program helps anyone
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 10:14:55PM -0400, Walter Bender wrote:
We cannot speak for OLPC, but we do have most of the active Sugar
developers on this list. Can you tell us a bit more about your
program?
regards.
-walter
if you dig into the stuff at:
http://www.thought.org/vbc/
you'll
28 matches
Mail list logo
