Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [Pkg-sugar-devel] sugar is marked for autoremoval from testing

Thanks for the reply. I subscribed to the list because there seemed to be a lot of sugar activity. I have been dismayed by the frequent threats to drop Sugar or a critical component. At one point, the messages suggested that the automated testing scripts could not even read the license text at

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [Pkg-sugar-devel] sugar is marked for autoremoval from testing

Quoting Tony Anderson (2016-06-24 13:13:57) > I subscribed to the list because there seemed to be a lot of sugar > activity. I appreciate your interest. > I have been dismayed by the frequent threats to drop Sugar or a > critical component. At one point, the messages suggested that the >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [Pkg-sugar-devel] sugar is marked for autoremoval from testing

Hi Tony! First of all: Thanks for your interest in Debian packaging of Sugar! Quoting Tony Anderson (2016-06-24 08:25:07) > Does anyone know what this is all about? How has Debian packaged Sugar > in one package? > What is the difference, if any, between 0.106 as released and 0.106.1-1? > Does

Re: [Sugar-devel] [GSOC] Font Editor Next Steps

Yesterday's Work I stumbled onto this issue in my glyph rendering module https://github.com/sugarlabs/edit-fonts-activity/issues/44 so this took a lot of time, but is still not implemented, I will look at Trufonts source later for this I was having issue's in implementing Treeview to show the

[Sugar-devel] Fwd: [Pkg-sugar-devel] sugar is marked for autoremoval from testing

Does anyone know what this is all about? How has Debian packaged Sugar in one package? What is the difference, if any, between 0.106 as released and 0.106.1-1? Does this one package include the essential activities? Does it include both sugar and sugar3? Tony Forwarded Message

[Sugar-devel] Fwd: [Pkg-sugar-devel] sugar is marked for autoremoval from testing

Does anyone know what this is all about? How has Debian packaged Sugar in one package? What is the difference, if any, between 0.106 as released and 0.106.1-1? Does this one package include the essential activities? Does it include both sugar and sugar3? What is an RC bug? Tony

[Sugar-devel] fun with fonts

Taking inspiration from the GSoC Font Editor project, I wrote a Glyph editor in Turtle Blocks. The script, glif2tb2.py, converts a .glif file into a Turtle Blocks project that can be rendered and edited. The basic idea is to create a turtle for each knot and control point and to render the glyph

Re: [Sugar-devel] fun with fonts

I love it :) Eli and I were wondering if logo had been used to develop fonts before and this is very cool!! :) On Jun 24, 2016 4:54 PM, "Walter Bender" wrote: > Taking inspiration from the GSoC Font Editor project, I wrote a Glyph > editor in Turtle Blocks. > > The

Re: [Sugar-devel] fun with fonts

On 06/24/2016 04:54 PM, Walter Bender wrote: > Taking inspiration from the GSoC Font Editor project, I wrote a Glyph > editor in Turtle Blocks. > Cool! > > [1] http://github.com/walterbender/turtle-font-script > [2] http://walterbender.github.io/turtleblocksjs/?file=fonteditor.tb That is a great

Re: [Sugar-devel] [GSOC] Font Editor Next Steps

Today's Work, all of the time went in building the Font Manager GUI I got stuck at creating a clickable CellRendered Icon (you can find the issue here ) which will be used for both setting fonts at favorites(in the first column) and

Re: [Sugar-devel] [GSOC] Font Editor Next Steps

On Jun 24, 2016 3:16 AM, "Yash Agarwal" wrote: > > Yesterday's Work > I stumbled onto this issue in my glyph rendering module > https://github.com/sugarlabs/edit-fonts-activity/issues/44 > so this took a lot of time, but is still not implemented, I will look at Trufonts