On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 11:48 AM James Cameron wrote:
> I'm also not sure how else the activity sources have diverged.
As long as we can achieve the same user experience, I'd recommend that we
ignore comparing changes made in each of the sources. There are better
things
that a developer's time
OK, in the face of my unease with seeing someone doing that (modifying files in
directories under package-management control) anywhere but in an isolated dev
environment (container or chroot), I think I've finally grasped a second
dimension to the Python path situation, particularly as it
Hello folks,
This is the last reminder to vote for the Sugar Labs Oversight Board
Elections 2019-21. The election closes on the 31st of January 2019. The
results will be declared soon after that. If you are still waiting to vote
and then the time is now. Better hustle because every vote counts!
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 08:09:00PM +0530, Rahul Bothra wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 11:48 AM James Cameron wrote:
> > I'm also not sure how else the activity sources have diverged.
>
> As long as we can achieve the same user experience, I'd recommend
> that we ignore comparing changes made
Thanks. Really interesting; I learned a few things from your
research.
One of the problems I faced when whipping up Sugar Live Build on
Debian was how our dependencies *do not* easily support using unusual
paths. Dependencies such as;
* Xsession, for starting Sugar itself,
* D-Bus, for
I am trying to port https://github.com/sugarlabs/arithmetic to GTk3 but
when i run the activity to understand the working(with GTK) it throws an
error "no module named sugar.activity.activity".I searched google for any
potential solutions but could not find anything .
Traceback (most recent call
6 matches
Mail list logo