[Sugar-devel] buildbot failure in Sugar Labs Buildbot on GConf-dbus-Fedora10

2009-02-12 Thread buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of GConf-dbus-Fedora10 on Sugar Labs Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/builders/GConf-dbus-Fedora10/builds/79 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/ Buildslave for this Build: Fedora10 Build Reason: Build Sour

Re: [Sugar-devel] logging irc setup

2009-02-12 Thread Ties Stuij
Nice! Thanks! /Ties On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 5:46 PM, David Van Assche wrote: > well, u can find it here: http://www.nubae.com/logs/sugar > > There are various curious commands the bot can help with based on > google stuff the list is as follows: > > [control command is @ and not !] > example: @g

Re: [Sugar-devel] FoodForce2 Storyboard

2009-02-12 Thread Mohit Taneja
Sure, I would keep that thing in mind next time. Regards, Mohit On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 8:49 AM, James Cameron wrote: > The attachment was readable using xpdf. Nice work. You should seek > hosting for HTTP download of large attachments though, because many many > people are given the attachme

[Sugar-devel] Soas3 XO image quick report

2009-02-12 Thread Gary C Martin
Hi folks, Here's just a very quick run through of the Activities currently part of the SoaS3 XO image that Marco provided last week to help get some wider SoaS testing going: http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/xoimages/ For the record, apart from some low level OS type issues (no cam

[Sugar-devel] Notes on triage meeting

2009-02-12 Thread Greg Dekoenigsberg
erikos ran an awesome meeting. My notes on what I think the purpose should be: First Goal. To go through all UNCONFIRMED bug reports and determine: * whether the bug report is a dupe. if so, close as Duplicate. * whether the bug report is missing key info. if so, ask questions in bug and

Re: [Sugar-devel] buildbot failure in Sugar Labs Buildbot on GConf-dbus-Fedora10

2009-02-12 Thread Greg Dekoenigsberg
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009, David Farning wrote: > Added. > > You might need to white-list buildbot in the list moderation. Done, thanks. --g -- Got an XO that you're not using? Loan it to a needy developer! [[ http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XO_Exchange_Registry ]] __

Re: [Sugar-devel] buildbot failure in Sugar Labs Buildbot on GConf-dbus-Fedora10

2009-02-12 Thread David Farning
Added. You might need to white-list buildbot in the list moderation. david On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Greg Dekoenigsberg wrote: > > Should these perhaps be going to Fedora-olpc list as well? > > --g > > -- > Got an XO that you're not using? Loan it to a needy developer! > [[ http://wi

[Sugar-devel] buildbot failure in Sugar Labs Buildbot on GConf-dbus-Fedora10

2009-02-12 Thread buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of GConf-dbus-Fedora10 on Sugar Labs Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/builders/GConf-dbus-Fedora10/builds/78 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/ Buildslave for this Build: Fedora10 Build Reason: Build Sour

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] webactivity: seed the XS cookie at startup

2009-02-12 Thread Carol Farlow Lerche
Martin, I want to understand what https traffic you are concerned will affect performance and caching. As far as I understand the need for https, it would only be used infrequently, when reauthenticating to the server. I.e..: 1. XO connects to Moodle without valid cookie and is redirected to http

Re: [Sugar-devel] buildbot failure in Sugar Labs Buildbot on GConf-dbus-Fedora10

2009-02-12 Thread Greg Dekoenigsberg
Should these perhaps be going to Fedora-olpc list as well? --g -- Got an XO that you're not using? Loan it to a needy developer! [[ http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XO_Exchange_Registry ]] On Thu, 12 Feb 2009, build...@sugarlabs.org wrote: > The Buildbot has detected a failed build of GConf-dbus-

[Sugar-devel] buildbot failure in Sugar Labs Buildbot on GConf-dbus-Fedora10

2009-02-12 Thread buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of GConf-dbus-Fedora10 on Sugar Labs Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/builders/GConf-dbus-Fedora10/builds/77 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/ Buildslave for this Build: Fedora10 Build Reason: Build Sour

[Sugar-devel] [Migrated] Design

2009-02-12 Thread David Farning
I have just gotten done migrated the design section from wiki.lp.org to sl.org. DesignTeam/Designs DesignTeam/Designs/Activity Management DesignTeam/Designs/Control Panel DesignTeam/Designs/Creative commons DesignTeam/Designs/Frame DesignTeam/Designs/Frame/lang-es DesignTeam/Designs/Journal D

Re: [Sugar-devel] FoodForce2 Storyboard

2009-02-12 Thread Ankur Verma
I guess there is some error with the attached file. I am unable to download it. -- Ankur 2009/2/11 Mohit Taneja > Hi All, > Please find attached the storyboard for the game FoodForce2. > > Looking forward to your feedback. > > Regards, > Mohit > > ___

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Soas meeting tomorrow, 17 UTC

2009-02-12 Thread Walter Bender
Let's also plan on a slobs meeting tomorrow (Friday) as well, 14 UTC on #sugar-meeting -walter On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: > Hello, > > we are going to have a Soas planning meeting tomorrow, at 17 UTC. Here > is a quick agenda, feel free to add to it. > > * Build

Re: [Sugar-devel] Soas meeting tomorrow, 17 UTC

2009-02-12 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: > Hello, > > we are going to have a Soas planning meeting tomorrow, at 17 UTC. Here > is a quick agenda, feel free to add to it. Place is the usual one, irc.freenode.net #sugar-meeting Marco

[Sugar-devel] Soas meeting tomorrow, 17 UTC

2009-02-12 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
Hello, we are going to have a Soas planning meeting tomorrow, at 17 UTC. Here is a quick agenda, feel free to add to it. * Build system setup and infrastructure. * Release announcement and changelogs. * Activities packaging. * Custom repositories. * File system layout and customization. * Testing

Re: [Sugar-devel] joyride, staging builds, sugar releases

2009-02-12 Thread Daniel Drake
2009/2/12 victor : > Sorry to insist on this, but I have not got it quite yet. > > Joyrides => obsolete (even though the builder script keeps > churning them out and telling the olpc devel list). Obsolete, but not really obsoleted by anything usable *yet*. > staging => what are these? Obsolete to

[Sugar-devel] joyride, staging builds, sugar releases

2009-02-12 Thread victor
Sorry to insist on this, but I have not got it quite yet. Joyrides => obsolete (even though the builder script keeps churning them out and telling the olpc devel list). staging => what are these? Obsolete too? release builds => only last week there was a release build announced on the olpc devel

[Sugar-devel] consequences of re-registering with XS

2009-02-12 Thread Daniel Drake
Hi, As I noted here: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Deployment_wishlist#Delete_registration_info we are in a sticky situation where a load of XOs are registered to one XS, which no longer exists. We want to register them to a new one, and we are having to manually go to each laptop and modify the sugar

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar.profile.jabber_registered and sugar.profile.is_registered() are deprecated?

2009-02-12 Thread Simon Schampijer
Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Morgan Collett > wrote: >> I mean if we need to reinstate the is_registered tracking, or >> something like that... I'm not sure of the status of the registration >> feature in 0.84 - all I can say authoritatively is that from a jabber >> s

[Sugar-devel] logging irc setup

2009-02-12 Thread David Van Assche
well, u can find it here: http://www.nubae.com/logs/sugar There are various curious commands the bot can help with based on google stuff the list is as follows: [control command is @ and not !] example: @google define:sugarlabs # !google [.google.country.code] [define:|spell:|movie:] # #

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] webactivity: seed the XS cookie at startup

2009-02-12 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote: > When thinking about it a bit more - the big plus with your approach that > it's only affects Browse - code wise, which is when back porting to 0.82 a > big plus, actually maybe the only way. Bingo! I think you're starting to read my mind

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] webactivity: seed the XS cookie at startup

2009-02-12 Thread Simon Schampijer
Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 11:54 PM, Simon Schampijer > wrote: >> Plan A - HTTPS to the rescue >> Just to understand better. >> >> Is the main issue that we have to change the protocol - or are you more >> worried about the CPU cost? > > Both. And also HTTPS network load, a

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] webactivity: seed the XS cookie at startup

2009-02-12 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 11:54 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote: > Plan A - HTTPS to the rescue > Just to understand better. > > Is the main issue that we have to change the protocol - or are you more > worried about the CPU cost? Both. And also HTTPS network load, as HTTPS is a lot less cache-friendly.

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] webactivity: seed the XS cookie at startup

2009-02-12 Thread Simon Schampijer
Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 11:32 PM, Simon Schampijer > wrote: >> Is your main request to get it into 0.82.1? Is this only a temporary >> solution and we get something else later? > > I think it'll be our "current" solution for a while... both branches? > >> PS: I am not a

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] webactivity: seed the XS cookie at startup

2009-02-12 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 11:32 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote: > Is your main request to get it into 0.82.1? Is this only a temporary > solution and we get something else later? I think it'll be our "current" solution for a while... both branches? > PS: I am not a security person - so for this discus

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] webactivity: seed the XS cookie at startup

2009-02-12 Thread Simon Schampijer
Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 6:47 PM, wrote: >> When starting up, call seed_xs_cookie() to > > Hi Simon, > > Hoping for some review :-) . Do you think this patch can make it into > the sucrose-0.82 branch? With a tad of elbow grease, it also applies > on top of master. > >

Re: [Sugar-devel] buildbot failure in Sugar Labs Buildbot on sugar-base-Ubuntu804

2009-02-12 Thread Morgan Collett
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 23:59, wrote: > BUILD FAILED: failed failed slave lost *cringe* The history of cane sugar is intertwined with slavery... This is a rather unfortunate juxtaposition. Anyway, back to the bits and bytes Morgan ___ Sugar-devel mai

Re: [Sugar-devel] Auto-authentication for Browse -

2009-02-12 Thread Simon Schampijer
Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Martin Langhoff > wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Andrés Ambrois >>> I might be missing something, but you're storing the laptop serial number >>> instead of the pubkey inside the cookie (unless /ofw/mfg-data/SN doesnt >>> stor

[Sugar-devel] Sugar-Developers meeting REMINDER (12 February, 2009 - 14.00 (UTC)) --- irc.freenode.net, #sugar-meeting

2009-02-12 Thread Simon Schampijer
Hi, AGENDA: This Friday is 0.84 Release Candidate 1 [1] - are we in good shape, what is left - blockers, what needs focusing, where can people help TODO list: update and add possible items [1] http://sugarlabs.org/go/DevelopmentTeam/Release/Roadmap#Schedule See you there, Simon ___

[Sugar-devel] buildbot failure in Sugar Labs Buildbot on GConf-dbus-Fedora10

2009-02-12 Thread buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of GConf-dbus-Fedora10 on Sugar Labs Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/builders/GConf-dbus-Fedora10/builds/76 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/ Buildslave for this Build: Fedora10 Build Reason: Build Sour