On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:50:12AM -0400, Steven M. Parrish wrote:
> All normal warnings apply. This is development code. Please report any
> issues you may have.
I tried flashing os6 to NAND. It boots until X comes up, then it gets
stuck on a white screen. I am experiencing the same problem w
2009/8/27 Yioryos Asprobounitis :
> I had this issue with os5 (see "...-swap" posts above in the
> fedora-olpc-list). It is something not related to swap but is happening often
> enough. Usually after 1-3 attempts removing all peripherals (and overclocking
> :) recovers and boots fine. Didn't h
Sameer Verma wrote:
> So, here's my request. Can someone whip up an activity that does the
> following:
In my view, this is not appropriate for an Activity. Sugar Activities are
not for managing the system. Also, as you noted, if Rainbow is active
then this is difficult or impossible, and this
Q2E18, haven't noticed how old it was. :)
Rafael Ortiz
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Mitch Bradley wrote:
> Which version of Open Firmware are you using?
>
> Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero wrote:
>> Thanks for your reply Mitch.
>>
>> Even thought, i pressed the '√' gamepad button at boot
I posed this question on OLPC Support Gang earlier and got responses
that its not possible to do so under bitfrost and rainbow.
===
"Hello everybody,
We have a lending library at SFSU, ready to go, but we need to have a
way to erase the config and journal every time the XO comes b
Thanks for your reply Mitch.
Even thought, i pressed the '√' gamepad button at boot
the system does not pass from loading ramdisk,
can any body build a new F11 on XO .img with the solution propossed
by Mitch ?
wmb: The solution for this is to add "dcon-unfreeze unfreeze" to
/boot/olpc.fth, some
mitch wrote:
> It's probably the same thing as the first item in
> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Rawhide-XO#Known_issues
>
> We made "pretty boot" the default in later versions of Open Firmware,
> but many alternative operating systems don't know how to "unfreeze" the
> screen.
i doubt that'
Hi Yioryos,
On 26 Aug 2009, at 20:23, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote:
> Thank you.
>
> Now olpc-powerd works as advertised. Kudos. However the problem with
> the overlap with the GNOME PM remains.
>
> I guess the X-server and Gnome power management updates also did
> not affect the battery moni
Hello
i was trying these instructions
(http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_XO-1) on an XO-1 for the new
build,
but the booting gets stuck on loading the ramdisk image
is there something else i should be doing ?.
Rafael Ortiz
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Yioryos
Asprobounitis wrote:
> Than
there's a bug been reported from various sources about the
sugar-hulahop .debs for ubuntu, which successfully build but don't
actually install, indicating that whoever built them for ubuntu didn't
actually bother to ... install them.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sugar-hulahop/+bu
Hi Eben,
On 26 Aug 2009, at 16:43, Eben Eliason wrote:
>> You really do need to upgrade ;-p
>
> I know! I've been waiting to figure out how to get the latest releases
> flashed onto my XOs. The last time I looked I didn't see clear
> instructions for doing so. Any pointers?
:-)
Good timing (see
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Gary C Martin wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> On 26 Aug 2009, at 16:09, Jim Simmons wrote:
>
>> Eben,
>>
>> I have given some thought to how I would implement getting image files
>> from removable media and I think I have a workable plan. Before I
>> describe it I'd like to
I think I'm looking in the right place, but the info isn't as readily
available as I'd hoped. I'm looking here:
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_on_a_Stick/Installation/OLPC
In particular, I'm looking at options 2 and 3. The third says it's not
yet supported. The second says it's not fully suppo
Hi Jim,
On 26 Aug 2009, at 16:09, Jim Simmons wrote:
> Eben,
>
> I have given some thought to how I would implement getting image files
> from removable media and I think I have a workable plan. Before I
> describe it I'd like to confess that it is *not* true that .84 code
> will show objects on
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:43:54AM -0400, Eben Eliason wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Gary C Martin wrote:
> > You really do need to upgrade ;-p
>
> I know! I've been waiting to figure out how to get the latest releases
> flashed onto my XOs. The last time I looked I didn't see clear
>
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_XO-1
http://dev.laptop.org/~smparrish/xo-1/builds/
The main point of this release is to ensure that only 0.84 compatible
activities are downloaded from ASLO.
here are the file differences since os5
-atlas-sse-3.8.3-7.fc11.i586
+atlas-sse-3.8.3-4.fc11.i586
-cup
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Gary C Martin wrote:
> Hi Eben,
>
> On 26 Aug 2009, at 14:53, Eben Eliason wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 5:43 AM, Sascha
>> Silbe wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 08:41:28AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>>>
The public API is the POSIX one, though I d
Eben,
I have given some thought to how I would implement getting image files
from removable media and I think I have a workable plan. Before I
describe it I'd like to confess that it is *not* true that .84 code
will show objects on the root directory of a thumb drive. It won't
show *anything* on
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>
> On 26.08.2009, at 14:53, Gavin Romig-Koch wrote:
>
> On 08/26/2009 08:27 AM, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>
> I keep forgetting to copy Gavin on new release announcements. But then, I
> can't possibly cc all the package maintainers for all the
On 26.08.2009, at 14:53, Gavin Romig-Koch wrote:
On 08/26/2009 08:27 AM, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
I keep forgetting to copy Gavin on new release announcements. But
then, I can't possibly cc all the package maintainers for all the
distros out there (unless they subscribe to an etoys-announ
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 5:43 AM, Sascha
Silbe wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 08:41:28AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>
>> The public API is the POSIX one, though I don't know how this will be
>> affected by future versions of Rainbow.
>
> I can't find anything regarding mount points in POSIX 2001.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:41:00AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:29, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:24, Sascha
> > Silbe wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:02:29AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> >>
> >>> Anybody knows what's up with buildslave2.sugarl
On 26.08.2009, at 12:11, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:48, Bert
> Freudenberg wrote:
>> On 26.08.2009, at 11:44, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>>>
>>> Btw, can we update the rawhide package for etoys?
>>
>> I don't even know what "rawhide" is but sure, go ahead. Or am I
>> misunderstan
You could send strings for function blocks that can later be eval-ed.
But the eval itself might slow things down a lot. You can also send
JSON objects between workers. Some browsers serialise the JSON to
string and then re-eval it, others send the actual object.
About shared data, try to stay away
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:48, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> On 26.08.2009, at 11:44, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:41, Bert
>> Freudenberg wrote:
>>> On 26.08.2009, at 03:22, Gary C Martin wrote:
>>>
-- Feature roadmap/Concept maps:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Feature_roa
On 26.08.2009, at 11:44, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:41, Bert
> Freudenberg wrote:
>> On 26.08.2009, at 03:22, Gary C Martin wrote:
>>
>>> -- Feature roadmap/Concept maps:
>>> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Feature_roadmap/Concept_maps
>>>
>>> Me, me, ME!! ;-) No, actually Tomeu
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:29, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:24, Sascha
> Silbe wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:02:29AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>>
>>> Anybody knows what's up with buildslave2.sugarlabs.org ?
>>
>> Nop, but it hasn't been updated lately anyway because we n
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:24, Sascha
Silbe wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:02:29AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>
>> Anybody knows what's up with buildslave2.sugarlabs.org ?
>
> Nop, but it hasn't been updated lately anyway because we now have
> buildslave-fedora-11-32bit. Is there a reason you'
Anybody knows what's up with buildslave2.sugarlabs.org ?
Thanks,
Tomeu
[to...@zviratko ~]$ ping buildslave2.sugarlabs.org
PING sugarlabs2.xen.prgmr.com (216.218.223.77) 56(84) bytes of data.
>From LaFrance-Internet-Services.gigabitethernet3-15.core1.fmt1.he.net
(66.220.10.126) icmp_seq=2 Destina
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 15:40, Eben Eliason wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Christian Schmidt
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> From: Tomeu Vizoso [mailto:to...@sugarlabs.org]
>> To: Daniel Drake [mailto:d...@laptop.org]
>> Cc: Gary C Martin [mailto:g...@garycmartin.com]
30 matches
Mail list logo
