2009/11/24 Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org:
[...]
I've just tried simple example[1] with simple feed[2] in system w/o
any 0install remains and it fails for the first time[3] but runs ok for 2nd.
I missed something in example code or its a unpredictable behaviour
(since [3] cailms for
Hi,
I have reviewed the Feature Policy page.
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Policy
I hope things are a bit clearer now about the process. It has been
adopted to the 0.88 roadmap, too. Please have a look and see if you have
any questions.
Regards,
Simon
Hello again everyone!
As I mentioned in my last email to de...@lists.laptop.org, there is a real
need for a GSM/CDMA usb modem support in our region since thats the most
common/available service in rural locations.
In my last email I proposed to the OLPC guys to include the option module
to
On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 09:36 -0500, Martin Abente wrote:
Would a patch that extends the allowed connection types be accepted in the
0.84 branch (that will be shipped with F11) ?
Depends on the patch, but in general one requirement I've been putting
on patches for OLPCs 0.84 fork is that the
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 10:27:57AM +, Thomas Leonard wrote:
2009/11/24 Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org:
[...]
I've just tried simple example[1] with simple feed[2] in system w/o
any 0install remains and it fails for the first time[3] but runs ok for 2nd.
I missed something in
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Martin Abente
mabe...@paraguayeduca.org wrote:
As I mentioned in my last email to de...@lists.laptop.org, there is a real
need for a GSM/CDMA usb modem support in our region since thats the most
common/available service in rural locations.
Hola Martin,
Hi,
After revisiting some of the changes I have made to the software while
working on deployments I just wanted to post the list again as a
refresher.
I have not had enough time to do the appropriate master-level QA on
these, or to get them running on the latest Sugar versions. I hope that
some
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
Hi,
After revisiting some of the changes I have made to the software while
working on deployments I just wanted to post the list again as a
refresher.
I have not had enough time to do the appropriate master-level QA on
Hi,
I think that customization support is going to be an key point for Sugar/SOAS
deployement efforts and for nanaging relationship with field structures. So I'm
trying to start an effort in order to write down in as much as possible detail
all the potentially existant entry points for
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:13:41 +0100, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Martin Abente
mabe...@paraguayeduca.org wrote:
As I mentioned in my last email to de...@lists.laptop.org, there is a
real
need for a GSM/CDMA usb modem support in our region
Hi
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Martin Abente
mabe...@paraguayeduca.org wrote:
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:13:41 +0100, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Martin Abente
mabe...@paraguayeduca.org wrote:
As I mentioned in my last email to
JujJust wanted to mention my admiration for the Tutorious team: they have
pushed forward a big feature that affects shell and activities, have
set up their instance of AMO for tutorials, have pinged periodically
the community for feedback, have made a spin of SoaS so others can
more easily test
2009/11/26 Martin Abente mabe...@paraguayeduca.org
Hello again everyone!
As I mentioned in my last email to de...@lists.laptop.org, there is a real
need for a GSM/CDMA usb modem support in our region since thats the most
common/available service in rural locations.
Have you looked at the
Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 24.11.2009, at 22:13, Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
Hi all,
with the next SoaS release coming up really soon (final image is
supposed to be composed this weekend, release date is Dec 8), there's a
new snapshot ready for you. It includes a lot of fixes and smaller
Sean DALY wrote:
that's the thing, there are no .img and .crc files for soas05xo that I can
find?
True, actually (sorry for the confusion). There are currently some
issues with the image creation for the XO, which just need to be worked
around (no big deal, really not) - we just need to get
Carlo Falciola wrote:
Hi,
I think that customization support is going to be an key point for Sugar/SOAS
deployement efforts and for nanaging relationship with field structures. So
I'm trying to start an effort in order to write down in as much as possible
detail all the potentially
On 25.11.2009, at 23:07, Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 24.11.2009, at 22:13, Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
Hi all,
with the next SoaS release coming up really soon (final image is
supposed to be composed this weekend, release date is Dec 8), there's a
new snapshot
17 matches
Mail list logo
