On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Gary C Martin g...@garycmartin.com wrote:
Hi Sayamindu,
On 25 Nov 2009, at 16:55, Sayamindu Dasgupta wrote:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
..snip snip
Another constant headache is with translations. How do you roll
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 11:19 PM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Sayamindu Dasgupta sayami...@gmail.com
wrote:
Maybe using a GConf key would be easier here ?
Let's make that kind of stuff a conffile. When you spin a custom image
for a
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Sayamindu Dasgupta
sayami...@gmail.com wrote:
Gconf is too brittle for this.
Actually we are already using GConf for somewhat similar stuff. For
example, by default Sugar provides a log-out button which is disabled
via setting the right GConf key in the XO
We are thinking in add CMDA/GSM/3G Modems Support in Sugar. We want to
discuss the best interface to allow user configure and use this type of
connections.
The basical idea that we managed is to have an option in control panel to
allow users to setup the connection, and a device icon in the bottom
Activity Homepage:
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4222
Sugar Platform:
0.82 - 0.86
Download Now:
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/26474/sliderule-6.xo
Release notes:
* fixed bug in pre-0.86 toolbars that was preventing launching
Sugar Labs Activities
I am seeing too many issues with OS9 to be comfortable leaving it in the wild.
OS8 is still available and if you have upgraded to OS9 I would suggest
reflashing with OS8 until the issues can be resolved..
I have a new release OS10 that I will be testing over the weekend with a goal
of
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 13:43, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 09:53 +, Daniel Drake wrote:
On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 09:45 +, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
We'll need that they make explicit which modules want to take
maintenance of and then each current maintainer
steven m. parrish wrote:
I am seeing too many issues with OS9 to be comfortable leaving it in the
wild.
OS8 is still available and if you have upgraded to OS9 I would suggest
reflashing with OS8 until the issues can be resolved..
I have a new release OS10 that I will be testing
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 02:57:01PM +0100, Sascha Silbe wrote:
From: Sugar Labs Bugs bugtracker-nore...@sugarlabs.org
Subject: Re: #1585 UNSP: need some way to present examples to other
activities
Cc: b...@lists.sugarlabs.org
Reply-To: sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009
Hi Daniel,
cannot locate any libabiword-2.6.5-3 -- Did it ever happen?
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
upgrade to abiword-2.6.5-2.olpc3 (built ages ago but never shipped by
OLPC) to fix problems with scripts such as nepali and arabic
(there are still a
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 16:10 +0100, Martin Langhoff wrote:
Hi Daniel,
cannot locate any libabiword-2.6.5-3 -- Did it ever happen?
yes, it's in koji
Daniel
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 02:57:57PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
IMO examples belong into the Journal as much (or as few, depending
on your
POV) as activity bundles belong there.
Maybe we should hide them in the default view and just show them
in
specialised ones.
Splitting up the
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 16:10 +0100, Martin Langhoff wrote:
Hi Daniel,
cannot locate any libabiword-2.6.5-3 -- Did it ever happen?
yes, it's in koji
Found - thanks.
m
--
martin.langh...@gmail.com
mar...@laptop.org --
Replying to [comment:3 dsd]:
I think you should leave this bug open until it is implemented (or
until the discussion outcome decides that this is not necessary).
Which is exactly what I did. :)
NEEDINFO just means we need outside action (e.g. mailing list
discussion).
Activity bundles only
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 12:48, Daniel Castelo
dcastelo.sugarl...@gmail.com wrote:
We are thinking in add CMDA/GSM/3G Modems Support in Sugar. We want to
discuss the best interface to allow user configure and use this type of
connections.
Awesome!
The basical idea that we managed is to have
It seems time to think about the next _big_ technical issue for
growing Sugar Labs. Clearly articulating the Sugar Stack. For the
last year or so, we have been circling the issue with talk of stable
APIs, Glucose, Fructose, and expected dependencies.
Last year, we created the release cycle. At
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 06:13:55AM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
Hi all,
Want to know what people think about Journal Plugins feature[1]
and particularly that design team think about UI changes[2] involved
in this feature.
[1] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Journal_Plugins#
[2]
On 27.11.2009, at 07:13, Aleksey Lim wrote:
Hi all,
Want to know what people think about Journal Plugins feature[1]
and particularly that design team think about UI changes[2] involved
in this feature.
[1] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Journal_Plugins#
[2]
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 04:23:02PM +0100, Sascha Silbe wrote:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 02:57:57PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
IMO examples belong into the Journal as much (or as few, depending
on your
POV) as activity bundles belong there.
Maybe we should hide them in the default
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 04:57:40PM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 27.11.2009, at 07:13, Aleksey Lim wrote:
Hi all,
Want to know what people think about Journal Plugins feature[1]
and particularly that design team think about UI changes[2] involved
in this feature.
[1]
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 12:48, Daniel Castelo
dcastelo.sugarl...@gmail.com wrote:
We are thinking in add CMDA/GSM/3G Modems Support in Sugar. We want to
discuss the best interface to allow user configure and use this
Hi all,
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Zero_Install_integration
The reason for this feature is to cover situations
* an activity has dependencies that weren't included to the Sugar
* Platform
* install/build activity specific binaries
* run non-sugar applications that are not well
Hi all,
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Sugar_Bundles
One file format to transfer various types of content in/out to/from
sugar environment with keeping metadata.
In fact, this feature is an end users oriented(technically we not invent
super format for various types of content, just
Activity Homepage:
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4034
Sugar Platform:
0.82 - 0.86
Download Now:
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/26476/moon-11.xo
Release notes:
- Includes latest translations available (many thanks to the translation team)
- Support new (0.86) and old
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 10:48 -0200, Daniel Castelo wrote:
The fields that user should configure are: Tel Number, User Name and
Password (which more?)
Perhaps APN.
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 04:40:00PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
Out of sugar environment, users know that there is only one type of
sugar objects and only thing they should do to activate them is
uploading .xo file to Journal and click it.
What about interacting with non-Sugar environments? What
Dear Sucrose Maintainers,
please provide source tarballs for the Sucrose 0.87.1 unstable release
[1] by the end of the 30th of November 2009 and announce them as
explained at [2].
Thanks,
Simon
[1] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.88/Roadmap#Schedule
[2]
Dear Sugar Community,
I am proud to present you the Sucrose 0.88 Schedule [1]!
* Dates *
We keep the time based 6 months release cycle. Final release will be:
31rd of March 2010. We basically have the same dates as GNOME. Those
dates are made in conjunction with the various distributions. So
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 09:55:20AM -0600, David Farning wrote:
It seems time to think about the next _big_ technical issue for
growing Sugar Labs. Clearly articulating the Sugar Stack. For the
last year or so, we have been circling the issue with talk of stable
APIs, Glucose, Fructose, and
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 05:56:42PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 09:55:20AM -0600, David Farning wrote:
Many of the discussion about this have stalled because of confusion
over what aspect the stack we are trying to define.
As a starting point, I would suggest:
1.
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 05:56:42PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 09:55:20AM -0600, David Farning wrote:
Many of the discussion about this have stalled because of confusion
over what aspect the
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 06:30:52PM +0100, Sascha Silbe wrote:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 04:40:00PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
Out of sugar environment, users know that there is only one type of
sugar objects and only thing they should do to activate them is
uploading .xo file to Journal and
Dear Sugar community,
the Feature policy [1] has been updated.
* Why this process *
Let me quote the first paragraph to exaplin what this policy is for:
The main goal of the feature process is to phrase out the ideas on how
Sugar should evolve that are floating around in the community. These
Hi all,
While preparing new 0.88 features, I encountered some in consistence in
activities vs. activity bundles case, so I'm going to reveal
Activity as regular objects(see [1] ml thread) feature but make it
less invasive in case existed user experience.
Hi all,
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/TableView_Widget
GTK widget to replace gtk.TreeView in Journal.
Benefit to Sugar
Standard gtk components are not designed to be lazy. Third party
widgets, I managed to find, uses scheme with renders(like gtk
components), introduced component uses
35 matches
Mail list logo
