On 29.11.2009, at 20:50, Simon Schampijer wrote:
Well, if an activity will work for an older release is not only
determined by the activity version number. For example, activities that
moved to the new toolbar design are not working for older releases
0.86. I don't think we can always
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 22:16 +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
Hi all,
While preparing new 0.88 features, I encountered some in consistence in
activities vs. activity bundles case, so I'm going to reveal
Activity as regular objects(see [1] ml thread) feature but make it
less invasive in case existed
I have a new activity
(http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4246) to which I am
about to add sharing. It will hat be pretty straight forward in terms
of simply exchanging game state and mouse clicks, but I want to be
able to let people join in two different ways: as a cooperator or as
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 08:35:42AM -0500, Walter Bender wrote:
I have a new activity
(http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4246) to which I am
about to add sharing. It will hat be pretty straight forward in terms
of simply exchanging game state and mouse clicks, but I want to be
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 12:34:45PM +, Daniel Drake wrote:
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 22:16 +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
Hi all,
While preparing new 0.88 features, I encountered some in consistence in
activities vs. activity bundles case, so I'm going to reveal
Activity as regular
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 02:54:49PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 12:34:45PM +, Daniel Drake wrote:
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 22:16 +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
Hi all,
While preparing new 0.88 features, I encountered some in consistence in
activities vs. activity
Hi Josh,
On 30 Nov 2009, at 06:23, Joshua Minor wrote:
Looks great to me. Can you wrangle doing a release? My dev/testing
environment is way out of date.
Sure, will do. I'll create a clone of Maze in git.sl.org and push there until
happy.
Regards,
--Gary
-josh
On Nov 29, 2009, at
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 05:50:59PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 05:37:44PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 03:02:15PM +0100, Sascha Silbe wrote:
Once 0install support gets merged, Sugar Platform should be enhanced to
include build tools
Sayamindu,
I tried out your new Get Books on my XO running the latest Fedora 12
install that came out last week. For comparison I ran the same tests
on the first version of Get Books which I got from the git clone of
Get IA Books that you made. I ran the old one on my Sugar test
environment on
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 03:10:29PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 05:50:59PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 05:37:44PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 03:02:15PM +0100, Sascha Silbe wrote:
Once 0install support gets merged,
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 7:34 AM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 22:16 +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
Hi all,
While preparing new 0.88 features, I encountered some in consistence in
activities vs. activity bundles case, so I'm going to reveal
Activity as regular
On 11/30/2009 10:00 AM, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 29.11.2009, at 20:50, Simon Schampijer wrote:
Well, if an activity will work for an older release is not only
determined by the activity version number. For example, activities that
moved to the new toolbar design are not working for older
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 07:49:15PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote:
On 11/30/2009 10:00 AM, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 29.11.2009, at 20:50, Simon Schampijer wrote:
Well, if an activity will work for an older release is not only
determined by the activity version number. For example,
Aleksey Lim wrote:
+1, but maybe use activity_release(or so) instead of
dotted_activity_version,
the full version in 0.88+ will be activity_version.activity_release?
The standard term is minor version number, so minor_version seems
appropriate.
--Ben
[cc += sugar-de...@]
On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 08:44 -0600, dfarn...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
Many people have access to the upload directory.
We could mitigate this by using separate groups. We already use a soas
group for soas.
Besides, do the activity authors still need to upload source tarballs
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 02:17:20PM -0500, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
[cc += sugar-de...@]
On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 08:44 -0600, dfarn...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
Many people have access to the upload directory.
We could mitigate this by using separate groups. We already use a soas
group for soas.
+1 from me for this feature proposal!
Both the under-the-hood and user experience simplifications are clear
improvements.
I would like to see this as a step towards removing the activity list
view, which starts to become redundant once activities can be
uninstalled from the Journal.
I disagree
2009/11/30 Wade Brainerd wad...@gmail.com:
I disagree that showing activities in the Journal, in addition to
activity instances and MIME objects, will cause confusion. Many
activities are more like content. Activities can be downloaded,
copied, modified, and deleted. In Sugar terminology,
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 07:58:57PM +, Daniel Drake wrote:
2009/11/30 Wade Brainerd wad...@gmail.com:
I disagree that showing activities in the Journal, in addition to
activity instances and MIME objects, will cause confusion. Many
activities are more like content. Activities can be
On 30.11.2009, at 20:02, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 07:49:15PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote:
On 11/30/2009 10:00 AM, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 29.11.2009, at 20:50, Simon Schampijer wrote:
Well, if an activity will work for an older release is not only
determined by
=== Sugar Digest ===
1. We celebrated Thanksgiving here in the U.S. this past week. It is a
time for family, food, and what we call football in North America.
In my family, I am always tasked with making desserts: pies, cakes,
tarts, and cookies. (This year, I made a pumpkin-praline pie, a pecan
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
2009/11/30 Wade Brainerd wad...@gmail.com:
I disagree that showing activities in the Journal, in addition to
activity instances and MIME objects, will cause confusion. Many
activities are more like content. Activities can
2009/11/30 Wade Brainerd wad...@gmail.com:
No, but perhaps we could take this opportunity to reduce this problem...
When deleting an object from the Journal that is an activity bundle,
we ought to display an alert with a scary icon. The alert should
clearly state that Journal entries will no
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
2009/11/30 Wade Brainerd wad...@gmail.com:
No, but perhaps we could take this opportunity to reduce this problem...
When deleting an object from the Journal that is an activity bundle,
we ought to display an alert with a
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
2009/11/30 Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com:
This isn't quite accurate. We've been adding some pre-loaded content
to the Journal for quite some time now,
Are you sure? Or are you referring to a manual process that you
This is a bug fix release for the XO 1.5. Also suited for SoaS (if it's not too
late for that).
== Sources ==
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/etoys/etoys-4.0.2339.tar.gz
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Etoys/Etoys-113.tar.gz
== Packaged for OLPC XO
On 29.11.2009, at 15:02, Sascha Silbe wrote:
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.86/Platform_Components
Speaking of Etoys - that 0.86 page lists 4.0.2206, whereas the actual Etoys
version in the 0.86 release was 4.0.2319 (and 4.0.2332 in 0.86.2). How come?
Should I just change it, and if so, to
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 02:15:46AM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 29.11.2009, at 15:02, Sascha Silbe wrote:
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.86/Platform_Components
Speaking of Etoys - that 0.86 page lists 4.0.2206, whereas the actual
Etoys version in the 0.86 release was 4.0.2319 (and
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 07:18:47PM -0500, Walter Bender wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
2009/11/30 Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com:
This isn't quite accurate. We've been adding some pre-loaded content
to the Journal for quite some time now,
This evening we brought up aslo-web.sugarlabs.org . It is a exact replica of
activities.sugarlabs.org. Within the next couple of day we will be load
balancing between them.
In the meantime... please test to help us make sure it is set up correctly
before it goes into production.
david
Hi all,
AFAIK OLPC will use 0.84 release and will lack of native sugar updater
but it could be useful idea to keep activities repository in one place.
So, the question is will html page which lists all ASLO activities in
microformat enough for OLPC updater.
--
Aleksey
== Source ==
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-toolkit/sugar-toolkit-0.87.1.tar.bz2
== News ==
- updated translations
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
2009/12/1 Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org:
AFAIK OLPC will use 0.84 release and will lack of native sugar updater
but it could be useful idea to keep activities repository in one place.
We are using the sugar control panel applet for activity updates as we
have done before.
So, the
== Source ==
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-base/sugar-base-0.87.1.tar.bz2
== News ==
version bump
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
34 matches
Mail list logo
