[Sugar-devel] IMPORTANT: sugar-jhbuild run no longer starts sugar-emulator by default

2010-02-03 Thread Sascha Silbe

On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 12:16:56AM +0100, Sascha Silbe wrote:

FYI: sugar-jhbuild is currently broken due to upstream (i.e.  
Gnome/Jhbuild) changes - even upstream itself is broken.

Has just been fixed (both upstream and our code).

IMPORTANT: sugar-jhbuild run (without further arguments) previously 
was equivalent to sugar-jhbuild run sugar-emulator. As this was 
confusing to quite a few people (they assumed sugar-jhbuild was an 
alternative to sugar-emulator, whereas it simply builds and runs the 
latter) I dropped that alias now.
Summary: Type sugar-jhbuild run sugar-emulator instead of 
sugar-jhbuild run.


CU Sascha

--
http://sascha.silbe.org/
http://www.infra-silbe.de/

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] IMPORTANT: sugar-jhbuild run no longer starts sugar-emulator by default

2010-02-03 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 11:41, Sascha Silbe
sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote:
 On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 12:16:56AM +0100, Sascha Silbe wrote:

 FYI: sugar-jhbuild is currently broken due to upstream (i.e.
  Gnome/Jhbuild) changes - even upstream itself is broken.

 Has just been fixed (both upstream and our code).

 IMPORTANT: sugar-jhbuild run (without further arguments) previously was
 equivalent to sugar-jhbuild run sugar-emulator. As this was confusing to
 quite a few people (they assumed sugar-jhbuild was an alternative to
 sugar-emulator, whereas it simply builds and runs the latter) I dropped that
 alias now.
 Summary: Type sugar-jhbuild run sugar-emulator instead of sugar-jhbuild
 run.

Will we need to update any docs?

Regards,

Tomeu

 CU Sascha

 --
 http://sascha.silbe.org/
 http://www.infra-silbe.de/
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLaVLOAAoJELpz82VMF3DaLSAH/2NFa904PF0ujKY5JjsSxOna
 o0qc1D1cJClioINwMV/FdObnKfk3ZZkWK2NIBdrzKDsc0vt228VpNCMAcIa92Bal
 XOSJfmSBNuU11tjlQIgt3jKmRvBXEeevzkenAZthYERdhuos8mir1G9ZNNNlRunB
 smPiFwVRYQOv6pvXQQcEqHhw2fMOvGcILgFMV+soeDjKFJy3VPWm+JeG+f+Q+dMM
 C38ouk1kdjBsTJBr9uMYXMoVFVKaSLGVg9LXeI50iOgZj08IqG7SIAB8/iF0mwOI
 K6+hfsUoIu2WrUFS7Xb84zdqiYWDAPjnnbUSxV0v6Mx1ZLie/2Xs0ns7bsWZ8ag=
 =ifWZ
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-

 ___
 Sugar-devel mailing list
 Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-jhbuild run no longer starts sugar-emulator by default

2010-02-03 Thread Sascha Silbe

On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 11:43:26AM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:


Will we need to update any docs?
I have updated the canonical sugar-jhbuild instructions [1] in the 
meantime. If you know any other docs telling users how to run 
sugar-emulator inside sugar-jhbuild please point them out to me (will 
probably get replaced by a link).



[1] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Jhbuild

CU Sascha

--
http://sascha.silbe.org/
http://www.infra-silbe.de/

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


[Sugar-devel] More new and revised chapters of Make Your Own Sugar Activities! ready for review, feedback

2010-02-03 Thread Jim Simmons
In this latest draft I have added a not quite complete chapter on
Making Shared Activities.  The part that is missing is on using DBus
Tubes to remotely call methods, and it's missing because I've never
done it.  I do plan to learn how to do this, come up with a decent
example program (something fancier than Hello Mesh), and write it up
in the book, but it will take awhile.  The new draft is at:

http://objavi.flossmanuals.net/books/ActivitiesGuideSugar-en-2010.02.03-18.11.39.pdf

I found out yesterday that copying code from PDF's, either the OBJAVI!
version here or the one the Floss Manuals website produces, does NOT
work.  In one case you get garbage and in the second you get code with
no indents.  I have set up a Git repository for the sample code in the
book and I will change all the references to copying and pasting code
to Open file name in the Git project you downloaded.

I actually had to learn things about Activity Sharing to write the new
chapter, so I am VERY concerned that what I think I learned is
correct.  I don't want to lead anyone astray!

I have reached the point in the book where the stuff I already know is
pretty much done.  From now on I'll be learning as I go.  If you've
been giving this project the benefit of the doubt now is a good time
to stop doing that.

Thanks,

James Simmons
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] Control Panel Font configuration

2010-02-03 Thread C. Scott Ananian
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Sayamindu Dasgupta sayami...@gmail.com wrote:
 It may make sense to allow setting of the font as well. While the
 default Sans may be good enough for most European scripts, it may
 cause problems for Arabic, Asian, South Asian scripts, etc. Sans
 usually resolves to DejaVu Sans, etc, which often carry suboptimal
 glyphs from non Latin scripts (to serve as a worst case fallback if
 nothing else is available). This can be worked around with clever
 fontconfig rules, but that would be painful to do for each and every
 script out there, and it might be useful to allow the user to choose
 the font-face along with the size.

Painful, but I'd argue that this is a necessary part of making a
properly localized build.  As discussed in another thread recently,
it's very confusing to have a plethora of fonts available all with
overlapping codesets.  Better would be to put in the work to make at
least the basic Sans font (and maybe Serif as well) have good
coverage of unicode via fontconfig.

This is a separate issue from whether the font control panel should
allow you to change the system font.  I'd say that the font control
panel *should* let you customize the font, just because it's fun.
I've made similar arguments before about the home screen, colors, etc,
etc.  It's fun, and it lets kids make the computers their own.
  --scott

-- 
 ( http://cscott.net/ )
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] How to start the Browse activity from my own activity?

2010-02-03 Thread Jim Simmons
Thomas,

You should be able to create your web page as a Journal entry with the
MIME type of text/html, then use code like that described here:

http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Almanac/sugar.datastore.datastore#How_do_I_resume_an_activity_from_the_datastore_programmatically.3F

That should open Browse on the Journal entry.  I haven't tried it
myself, but I have used the other information on that page
successfully, including creating Journal entries.

James Simmons


 Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 20:58:59 +0100
 From: Behavior Vehikel b.vehi...@googlemail.com
 Subject: [Sugar-devel] How to start the Browse activity from my own
        activity?
 To: sugar-devel sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
 Message-ID:
        eee660ad1002011158p5fbd93faq6bb45f75d5db...@mail.gmail.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

 How to start the Browse activity from my own activity?

___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] How to start the Browse activity from my own activity?

2010-02-03 Thread Bert Freudenberg
Ugh. I can't imagine that is an officially supported method. 

- Bert -

On 03.02.2010, at 09:41, Jim Simmons wrote:
 
 Thomas,
 
 You should be able to create your web page as a Journal entry with the
 MIME type of text/html, then use code like that described here:
 
 http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Almanac/sugar.datastore.datastore#How_do_I_resume_an_activity_from_the_datastore_programmatically.3F
 
 That should open Browse on the Journal entry.  I haven't tried it
 myself, but I have used the other information on that page
 successfully, including creating Journal entries.
 
 James Simmons
 
 
 Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 20:58:59 +0100
 From: Behavior Vehikel b.vehi...@googlemail.com
 Subject: [Sugar-devel] How to start the Browse activity from my own
activity?
 To: sugar-devel sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
 Message-ID:
eee660ad1002011158p5fbd93faq6bb45f75d5db...@mail.gmail.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
 
 How to start the Browse activity from my own activity?
 
 ___
 Sugar-devel mailing list
 Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] How to start the Browse activity from my own activity?

2010-02-03 Thread Behavior Vehikel
Hi,

 You should be able to create your web page as a Journal entry with the
 MIME type of text/html, then use code like that described here:

 http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Almanac/sugar.datastore.datastore#How_do_I_resume_an_activity_from_the_datastore_programmatically.3F

OK, I will try this way. Next weekend I give the Journal a chance.

Thanks Thomas

 You should be able to create your web page as a Journal entry with the
 MIME type of text/html, then use code like that described here:

 http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Almanac/sugar.datastore.datastore#How_do_I_resume_an_activity_from_the_datastore_programmatically.3F

-- 
http://digital-defect.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


[Sugar-devel] Sugar Digest 2009-02-03 (addendum)

2010-02-03 Thread Walter Bender
I forgot to mention a few things in yesterday's Digest:

(1) We need to put together our Google Summer of Code proposal...
please contact me if you are interested in helping.
(2) We have several SL proposals submitted to organizations that
require voting. Please visit
http://www.dmlcompetition.net/pligg/story.php?title=496 and
http://refresheverything.com/SugarLabsMassachusetts and cast your
vote.
(3) The Steven Parrish and team in Paraguay have made great progress
on porting Fedora 11 (and Sugar 0.84) to the OLPC XO-1. This will mean
that old OLPC hardware will be able to readily run recent versions of
Sugar.

regards.

-walter

-- 
Walter Bender
Sugar Labs
http://www.sugarlabs.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Feature Status

2010-02-03 Thread Walter Bender
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
 Hi,

 today is Feature Freeze [1]! Here is a status on the pending features [2]:

 *** 3G Support
 The 3G Feature has been landed. Some improvements for this Feature are
 pending.

 *** Enhanced color selector
 The enhanced color selector has seen some design iterations over the
 last two weeks. A decision needs to be made which design is picked and
 the code needs to be reviewed. We have to work together closely now to
 land this.

 *** Write to journal anytime
 No patch has been made to try the behavior to display the Journal when
 closing for the first time. This looks rather unlikely to land.

I have a simple patch that enables the naming alert to be activated
from the toolbar at anytime and not automatically activated on stop.
Would such a patch be considered for 0.88 and we can revisit for 0.90?
(Note that this is a feature that originated in the field.)

-walter

 *** Font configuration
 We have a design, but no patch for the Control Panel section, yet.

 *** Thumbs View in Journal
 We have some code. It has to be reviewed intensely though as it is quite
 a big refactoring and is based on a new widget (shell scope). Would be
 nice to land it though.

 *** Activity version
 No patch yet. There was agreement on the format though. Unlikely to make it.


 We will not delay the Feature Freeze and stick to the schedule. If your
 Feature did not land yet, you can ask for an exception [3]. To request
 an exception send mail to sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org, referencing
 the patches (ticket) you would like to land. It will have to be granted
 by two members of the release team (Tomeu and Simon), on the base of
 community feedback.

 We will delay the tarballs due to be able to focus on reviews.

 Regards,
    Simon

 [1] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.88/Roadmap#Schedule
 [2] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.88/Feature_List
 [3] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Release#Feature_freeze
 ___
 Sugar-devel mailing list
 Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel




-- 
Walter Bender
Sugar Labs
http://www.sugarlabs.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] IMPORTANT: sugar-jhbuild run no longer starts sugar-emulator by default

2010-02-03 Thread Jim Simmons
Sascha,

I'm not sure that what you're proposing is any less confusing than
what we have now.  In my opinion sugar-jhbuild IS an alternative to
sugar-emulator, at least if you define sugar-emulator as what is
provided as a Sugar environment by Fedora and other distros.  You can
run either one and it will not be affected by what you have done with
the other.  I think of sugar-jhbuild as running in its own little
world.  For instance, I'm going to use sugar-jhbuild run to test using
new style Toolbars with my Activities and use the installed
sugar-emulator for testing backward compatibility on the same box.

Are there any other arguments that you could use with run other than
sugar-emulator?

James Simmons

 Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 11:41:21 +0100
 From: Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org
 Subject: [Sugar-devel] IMPORTANT: sugar-jhbuild run no longer starts
        sugar-emulator by       default
 To: sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
 Message-ID: 20100203104121.gd12...@twin.sascha.silbe.org
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

 On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 12:16:56AM +0100, Sascha Silbe wrote:

 FYI: sugar-jhbuild is currently broken due to upstream (i.e.
 Gnome/Jhbuild) changes - even upstream itself is broken.
 Has just been fixed (both upstream and our code).

 IMPORTANT: sugar-jhbuild run (without further arguments) previously
 was equivalent to sugar-jhbuild run sugar-emulator. As this was
 confusing to quite a few people (they assumed sugar-jhbuild was an
 alternative to sugar-emulator, whereas it simply builds and runs the
 latter) I dropped that alias now.
 Summary: Type sugar-jhbuild run sugar-emulator instead of
 sugar-jhbuild run.

 CU Sascha
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] screen blurring using firefox 3.5 and 3.6

2010-02-03 Thread Tim McNamara
On 26 January 2010 17:15, Bryan Berry br...@olenepal.org wrote:

 I have tested firefox 3.5 and 3.6 on the XO with Sugar version
 sugar-0.81.7-1.

 I see significant blurring whenever a png image is added for manipulated

 I also had this issue w/ os10 for 0.84?
 http://dev.laptop.org/~smparrish/XO-1/builds/OS10/


Just got this email. GMail has been acting very slow recently. Which
activity is this, sorry? I could have a go at converting the PNGs into SVG
format over the weekend if desired. That way the background would render
over the whole screen  the animals' distortion would be minimised. Let me
know the URI to the git repo.

Also, do we know who owns copyright of the images? I can't create derivative
works without permission. Also, if this goes ahead, I would like to add to
the Open Clipart Library. Is this okay?

Thanks, Tim.
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] IMPORTANT: sugar-jhbuild run no longer starts sugar-emulator by default

2010-02-03 Thread C. Scott Ananian
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Jim Simmons nices...@gmail.com wrote:
 I'm not sure that what you're proposing is any less confusing than
 what we have now.  In my opinion sugar-jhbuild IS an alternative to
 sugar-emulator, at least if you define sugar-emulator as what is
 provided as a Sugar environment by Fedora and other distros.  You can
 run either one and it will not be affected by what you have done with
 the other.  I think of sugar-jhbuild as running in its own little
 world.  For instance, I'm going to use sugar-jhbuild run to test using
 new style Toolbars with my Activities and use the installed
 sugar-emulator for testing backward compatibility on the same box.

 Are there any other arguments that you could use with run other than
 sugar-emulator?

Yes:
 jhbuild run make
 jhbuild run make check
 jhbuild run python
etc.

I think it displays exactly the problem Sascha is trying to fix that
people think that sugar-jhbuild is sugar-emulator, instead of (the
actual case) jhbuild just being a command that sets some environment
variables and then execs the real program, be that sugar-emulator or
make or python or whatever.
 --scott

-- 
 ( http://cscott.net/ )
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Feature Status

2010-02-03 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 02/03/2010 09:15 PM, Walter Bender wrote:
 On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Simon Schampijersi...@schampijer.de  wrote:
 Hi,

 today is Feature Freeze [1]! Here is a status on the pending features [2]:

 *** 3G Support
 The 3G Feature has been landed. Some improvements for this Feature are
 pending.

 *** Enhanced color selector
 The enhanced color selector has seen some design iterations over the
 last two weeks. A decision needs to be made which design is picked and
 the code needs to be reviewed. We have to work together closely now to
 land this.

 *** Write to journal anytime
 No patch has been made to try the behavior to display the Journal when
 closing for the first time. This looks rather unlikely to land.

 I have a simple patch that enables the naming alert to be activated
 from the toolbar at anytime and not automatically activated on stop.
 Would such a patch be considered for 0.88 and we can revisit for 0.90?
 (Note that this is a feature that originated in the field.)

 -walter

I agree, this is as an important issue to solve. What about having a 
button going to the Journal detail view of the entry? This is the 
logical place to make such additions.

Or how do you like the idea to have an option in the activity toolbar 
for the description [1]? And adding later one for the tags, too?

Regards,
Simon

http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/File:Description.png
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [Feature] [DESIGN] Enhanced Color Selector

2010-02-03 Thread Simon Schampijer
Thanks Tim for your feedback,

On 02/02/2010 11:54 PM, Tim McNamara wrote:
 On 2 February 2010 22:45, Simon Schampijersi...@schampijer.de  wrote:

 In the design meeting and the ml-thread the '+' layout and the rows of

 XOs were favored. Eben brought as well the 'static rows with separated
 fill/stroke' on the table. Let's try to find an agreement.


 The proposal looks great. May I suggest a revision to the string literals?

 Click to change stroke color: =  Outline
 Click to change fill color: =  Body

 Stroke/Fill are terms of art in vector drawing area. My guess is that the
 terms outline and body (when looking at the XO figure) may be more natural.

I guess this is right, stroke/fill are technical terms. Maybe 
Inline/Outline would work, too?

 I feel we can omit Click to change or replace it with Choose. I'm pretty
 sure it'll be obvious by exploration that clicking on the little XOs changes
 the big one.

Choose sounds good to me, too.

Thanks,
Simon
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


[Sugar-devel] Fwd: DML Competition open for resubmissions! All applicants must resubmit by Feb 15th at noon EST

2010-02-03 Thread Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero
For our attention.




-- Forwarded message --
From: Mandy Dailey mandy.dai...@duke.edu
Date: Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 5:01 PM
Subject: DML Competition open for resubmissions! All applicants must
resubmit by Feb 15th at noon EST
To: dmlc2010-applica...@duke.edu


The application system for the 2010 HASTAC/MacArthur Foundation
Digital Media and Learning Competition is now open for resubmissions.
Resubmit your applications here: http://dmlcompetition.net/fastapps/login.php.
All applications are due by February 15th at noon EST.

The resubmission period is designed to allow you to revise and
strengthen your applications by tweaking, editing, broadening, etc.
your initial application to incorporate any useful feedback or ideas
offered by the public.
It is not necessary for you to revise your application based on the
feedback you receive, however, all previously submitted applications
MUST be resubmitted (even those that have not been edited or changed
in any way).
The application form has not changed.
Resubmitted applications will not be available in the public
commenting system until after February 15th.

Good luck!
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Feature Status

2010-02-03 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 02/01/2010 07:08 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
 Hi,

 today is Feature Freeze [1]! Here is a status on the pending features [2]:

 *** 3G Support
 The 3G Feature has been landed. Some improvements for this Feature are
 pending.

 *** Enhanced color selector
 The enhanced color selector has seen some design iterations over the
 last two weeks. A decision needs to be made which design is picked and
 the code needs to be reviewed. We have to work together closely now to
 land this.

 *** Write to journal anytime
 No patch has been made to try the behavior to display the Journal when
 closing for the first time. This looks rather unlikely to land.

 *** Font configuration
 We have a design, but no patch for the Control Panel section, yet.

 *** Thumbs View in Journal
 We have some code. It has to be reviewed intensely though as it is quite
 a big refactoring and is based on a new widget (shell scope). Would be
 nice to land it though.

 *** Activity version
 No patch yet. There was agreement on the format though. Unlikely to make it.

There is a patch in #1701 for this Feature. Not very invasive.

Regards,
Simon

___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [Feature] [DESIGN] Enhanced Color Selector

2010-02-03 Thread Eben Eliason
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
 Thanks Tim for your feedback,

 On 02/02/2010 11:54 PM, Tim McNamara wrote:
 On 2 February 2010 22:45, Simon Schampijersi...@schampijer.de  wrote:

 In the design meeting and the ml-thread the '+' layout and the rows of

 XOs were favored. Eben brought as well the 'static rows with separated
 fill/stroke' on the table. Let's try to find an agreement.


 The proposal looks great. May I suggest a revision to the string literals?

 Click to change stroke color: =  Outline
 Click to change fill color: =  Body

These sound good to me.

 Stroke/Fill are terms of art in vector drawing area. My guess is that the
 terms outline and body (when looking at the XO figure) may be more natural.

 I guess this is right, stroke/fill are technical terms. Maybe
 Inline/Outline would work, too?

 I feel we can omit Click to change or replace it with Choose. I'm pretty
 sure it'll be obvious by exploration that clicking on the little XOs changes
 the big one.

 Choose sounds good to me, too.

We may not even need the instruction at all. I think just using
Body: and Outline: labels could suffice.

Good suggestions,
Eben

 Thanks,
    Simon
 ___
 Sugar-devel mailing list
 Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Digest 2009-02-03 (addendum)

2010-02-03 Thread Art Hunkins
FWIW, my activities run perfectly with both Strawberry and Blueberry SoaS 
plugged into my XO-1.

The only small issue I've noticed is that the XO-1 does not close down 
completely at the end.

Art Hunkins

- Original Message - 
From: Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com
To: community-n...@lists.sugarlabs.org
Cc: iaep i...@lists.sugarlabs.org; Sugar-dev Devel 
sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 3:11 PM
Subject: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Digest 2009-02-03 (addendum)


I forgot to mention a few things in yesterday's Digest:

 (3) The Steven Parrish and team in Paraguay have made great progress
 on porting Fedora 11 (and Sugar 0.84) to the OLPC XO-1. This will mean
 that old OLPC hardware will be able to readily run recent versions of
 Sugar.

 regards.

 -walter

 -- 
 Walter Bender
 Sugar Labs
 http://www.sugarlabs.org
 ___
 Sugar-devel mailing list
 Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel 

___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] IMPORTANT: sugar-jhbuild run no longer starts sugar-emulator by default

2010-02-03 Thread Jim Simmons
Scott,

In the Make Your Own sugar Activities! book I'm doing at Floss
Manuals I do refer to sugar-emulator as something distinct from
sugar-jhbuild.  For instance, I'll say, If you're using sugar-jhbuild
under Fedora 11 do this, if you're using sugar-jhbuild do that.  Even
though technically what I call sugar-jhbuild is not completely
different from sugar-emulator the experience of running them is
different.  In earlier versions ./sugar-jhbuild run would use more
recent versions of libraries that were actually installed on the box.

Calling ./sugar-jhbuild run sugar-emulator just sugar-jhbuild is a
convenient way to get people to know what you're referring to, even if
not strictly accurate.

I wasn't aware that run had those options.  I don't think it's
documented anywhere.

James Simmons

On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 3:42 PM, C. Scott Ananian csc...@laptop.org wrote:


 Are there any other arguments that you could use with run other than
 sugar-emulator?

 Yes:
  jhbuild run make
  jhbuild run make check
  jhbuild run python
 etc.

 I think it displays exactly the problem Sascha is trying to fix that
 people think that sugar-jhbuild is sugar-emulator, instead of (the
 actual case) jhbuild just being a command that sets some environment
 variables and then execs the real program, be that sugar-emulator or
 make or python or whatever.
  --scott
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


[Sugar-devel] INVITATION: Sri Lanka QA Team Call -- Friday 5AM EU Time

2010-02-03 Thread Holt
Spread the Word if you believe in shipping Quality XO-1 and XO-1.5 
software to increasing numbers of OLPC/Sugar kids worldwide -- we 
*cannot* fix all bugs but we CAN organize what we have -- sanding off 
rough edges to build a better classroom experience, One Step at a Time.


I need 1 or 2 experienced XO/Sugar testing people on this Friday 
conference call with the professional QA team volunteering from Sri 
Lanka.  Reply to me personally if you've worked alongside any groups like:


   http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Friends_in_testing
   http://wiki.laptop.org/go/WellyNZTesters
   http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_New_Zealand
   http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/BugSquad

Or, if you or a trusted friend/colleague have strong/independent QA or 
volunteer coordinator experience, send them my way -- explaining how 
they self-organize, balancing end-user requirements *without* involving 
their own ego, and proactively communicate with their peers.


   * Reply with your phone number, anywhere worldwide, and the best 
times to call you
   * Type /query CanoeBerry at the bottom of 
http://webchat.freenode.net at diff times of day until you reach me

   * Include your resume/CV or similar where possible

Initial Call is 5AM this Friday for most Europeans/many Africans.  Like 
I said, we don't fart around when our job is reshaping learning around 
this planet, and I can't promise anything except a position of 
responsibility you will need to fill.  Join James Cameron in Australia, 
myself in Boston, a rep from New Zealand's longstanding volunteer 
testing crew, and the core testing team in Sri Lanka as we get 
organized.  Thanks for forwarding!

--Holt


Subject:Re: Sri Lanka QA Team BACK ON TASK!
Date:   Thu, 4 Feb 2010 10:30:12 +1300
From:   Tabitha Roder tabitha.ro...@gmail.com
To: olpc...@lists.laptop.org
CC: Alastair, Rebecca, Brenda, James, Kapila, Holt


Hi NZ testers

...asking for a NZ tester to join this call on Friday at 5pm NZ time:

+1 508 389-7333 (free with a full Skype account)
   Conf Access Code: TO FOLLOW

If you can join this call and help with the Sri Lanka quality assurance 
team that would be great.


Thanks
Tabitha


*Friday 5 February 2010, 04:00:00FRI 09:30(SLanka)   
FRI 15:00(Aus) FRI 17:00(NZ) THURS 23:00(US/EST)*



   //



___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] IMPORTANT: sugar-jhbuild run no longer starts sugar-emulator by default

2010-02-03 Thread C. Scott Ananian
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Jim Simmons nices...@gmail.com wrote:
 In the Make Your Own sugar Activities! book I'm doing at Floss
 Manuals I do refer to sugar-emulator as something distinct from
 sugar-jhbuild.  For instance, I'll say, If you're using sugar-jhbuild
 under Fedora 11 do this, if you're using sugar-jhbuild do that.  Even
 though technically what I call sugar-jhbuild is not completely
 different from sugar-emulator the experience of running them is
 different.  In earlier versions ./sugar-jhbuild run would use more
 recent versions of libraries that were actually installed on the box.

 Calling ./sugar-jhbuild run sugar-emulator just sugar-jhbuild is a
 convenient way to get people to know what you're referring to, even if
 not strictly accurate.

 I wasn't aware that run had those options.  I don't think it's
 documented anywhere.

http://live.gnome.org/Jhbuild
http://library.gnome.org/devel/jhbuild/unstable/command-reference.html.en#command-reference-run

I'm not sure exactly why sugar forked jhbuild, but I'm guessing one of
the ways that sugar-jhbuild differs from upstream jhbuild is that the
'run' command used to have a default command.  Maybe Sascha can
explain the differences.
  --scott

-- 
 ( http://cscott.net/ )
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] screen blurring using firefox 3.5 and 3.6

2010-02-03 Thread James Cameron
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 10:33:12AM +1300, Tim McNamara wrote:
 On 26 January 2010 17:15, Bryan Berry br...@olenepal.org wrote:
  I see significant blurring whenever a png image is added for manipulated
 
 Just got this email. GMail has been acting very slow recently.

No, it wasn't GMail's fault ... this was a message with large attachment
that was held in the mailing list moderation queue and only recently
released.  The thread has progressed since then.

 Which activity is this, sorry?

Firefox and Browse.

 I could have a go at ...

It's an interaction between the browser rendering and the graphics
subsystems, the blur isn't really an out of focus effect, but 
incorrect pixels left behind on screen.

The thread moved from the mailing list to the bug tracking systems ...
have a look at the Sugarlabs ticket #1689 for the discussion since.
http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/1689

-- 
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Feature Status

2010-02-03 Thread Walter Bender
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
 On 02/03/2010 09:15 PM, Walter Bender wrote:

 On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Simon Schampijersi...@schampijer.de
  wrote:

 Hi,

 today is Feature Freeze [1]! Here is a status on the pending features
 [2]:

 *** 3G Support
 The 3G Feature has been landed. Some improvements for this Feature are
 pending.

 *** Enhanced color selector
 The enhanced color selector has seen some design iterations over the
 last two weeks. A decision needs to be made which design is picked and
 the code needs to be reviewed. We have to work together closely now to
 land this.

 *** Write to journal anytime
 No patch has been made to try the behavior to display the Journal when
 closing for the first time. This looks rather unlikely to land.

 I have a simple patch that enables the naming alert to be activated
 from the toolbar at anytime and not automatically activated on stop.
 Would such a patch be considered for 0.88 and we can revisit for 0.90?
 (Note that this is a feature that originated in the field.)

 -walter

 I agree, this is as an important issue to solve. What about having a button
 going to the Journal detail view of the entry? This is the logical place to
 make such additions.

 Or how do you like the idea to have an option in the activity toolbar for
 the description [1]? And adding later one for the tags, too?


I think this is more than adequate. I would have it be additive rather
than editing the entire description on the toolbar.

-walter

 Regards,
   Simon

 http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/File:Description.png




-- 
Walter Bender
Sugar Labs
http://www.sugarlabs.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] More new and revised chapters of Make Your Own Sugar Activities! ready for review, feedback

2010-02-03 Thread James Cameron
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 10:35:06AM -0600, Jim Simmons wrote:
 [...]  In one case you get garbage and in the second you get code with
 no indents.  I have set up a Git repository for the sample code in the
 book and I will change all the references to copying and pasting code
 to Open file name in the Git project you downloaded.
 
 I actually had to learn things about Activity Sharing to write the new
 chapter, so I am VERY concerned that what I think I learned is
 correct.  I don't want to lead anyone astray!

Perhaps having your git repository code reviewed by Sugar developers
may assist ... with the comment that the purpose of the code is for
building more developers.

-- 
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel