Thanks, Michael, this has been the first viable method for getting Sugar
0.88 working on an XO-1.5 ... I'd been needing that for some time; to
check new bugs we find in 0.84 against 0.88, and to develop changes
against 0.88 after I've done them on 0.84.
Double-apologies then for all the rough
On 4/28/10, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On 28 April 2010 11:57, Michael Stone mich...@laptop.org wrote:
You couldn't find logs of the failure because olpc-dm is redirecting
stdout and
stderr to /dev/null.
I don't think this is true.
I wrote from memory and, as you say, the details
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 22:10, Sayamindu Dasgupta sayami...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Lucian Branescu
lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote:
There already is a mostly complete pywebkitgtk activity, Surf.
There has been a lot of debate on whether webkit is better than gecko
El Sat, 24-04-2010 a las 07:19 +, Aleksey Lim escribió:
In my mind activities on ASLO are not something like packages in regular
GNU/Linux distribution. ASLO is not one centralized product, as already
was mentioned several times it is (or should) palace to share your work
(maybe in trash)
On 29 April 2010 09:46, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
I liked your proposal of creating per-deployment collections to manage a
set of activities that has been tested and approved. I think this is one
of the things Uruguay wanted.
If we decided to go this path, what would be
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
El Sat, 24-04-2010 a las 07:19 +, Aleksey Lim escribió:
In my mind activities on ASLO are not something like packages in regular
GNU/Linux distribution. ASLO is not one centralized product, as already
was mentioned
Bernie Innocenti wrote:
El Sat, 24-04-2010 a las 07:19 +, Aleksey Lim escribió:
In my mind activities on ASLO are not something like packages in regular
GNU/Linux distribution. ASLO is not one centralized product, as already
was mentioned several times it is (or should) palace to share
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 08:46:06AM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
El Sat, 24-04-2010 a las 07:19 +, Aleksey Lim escribió:
In my mind activities on ASLO are not something like packages in regular
GNU/Linux distribution. ASLO is not one centralized product, as already
was mentioned
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 06:35:03AM -0700, Thomas C Gilliard wrote:
Bernie Innocenti wrote:
El Sat, 24-04-2010 a las 07:19 +, Aleksey Lim escribió:
In my mind activities on ASLO are not something like packages in regular
GNU/Linux distribution. ASLO is not one centralized
El Wed, 28-04-2010 a las 18:41 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso escribió:
Several contributors are hindered or even put off by the current
process. It often takes more time to handle mere technicalities (save
patch to file, create ticket in Trac, attach patch, wait for review,
push) than it takes to
I got the last version from http://dev.laptop.org/~sayamindu/GetBooks-5.xo.
But is necesary add it to ASLO.
I have a question. Is GetBooks like a new version of Get Internet Archive
Books? Get Internet Archive Books should be removed of ASLO?
I made some little improves to GetBooks, like
*
El Thu, 29-04-2010 a las 09:54 -0300, Daniel Drake escribió:
3. Reproducibility in low-connectivity deployments, or even for cases
such as paraguay where connectivity is good but going to ASLO will
really be slw and it's much more desirable to set up some simple
infrastructure to run it
On 29 April 2010 18:22, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
This is easily done by tuning Squid to cache large files if they
have .xo extensions. The update panel only does one uncachable query to
ASLO.
Not quite:
1. squid still makes the outgoing request to the upstream server, to
Daniel,
Get Books shares a fair amount of code (and an icon) with Get Internet
Archive Books but is not a new version of it. GB uses OPDS (Open
Publication and Distribution System) which means it can support any
source of books that uses that system. I would *not* make a Get Books
Ceibal. What
14 matches
Mail list logo
