On 10/06/2011 04:58 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
foo is [] is not a valid way of checking if a list is empty
as this code intends.
foo alone as a boolean operator is an equivalent length check,
and also serves as a is not None check too.
---
bin/sugar-session |5 ++---
1 files changed, 2
On 10/06/2011 04:59 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
Sugar is currently activing a new keyboard config even if the user
did not change any settings.
Looks good.
Avoid this by only activating the configuration if user-specified
settings are found in gconf. Also remove the default 'evdev' model
string
On 10/08/2011 09:57 PM, Sascha Silbe wrote:
Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of 2011-10-07 11:13:15 +0200:
'/ofw' is not used anymore on the XO, '/proc/device-tree' is used now
instead. Instead of just adjusting for that change we took the
chance to make the section hardware
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 9:00 PM, Sascha Silbe si...@activitycentral.com wrote:
Excerpts from Daniel Drake's message of 2011-10-05 23:05:16 +0200:
The calculation of how many grid cells to assign a child element
has a bug in that it rounds down instead of up.
[...]
Thanks for the patch
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Sascha Silbe si...@activitycentral.com wrote:
Excerpts from Daniel Drake's message of 2011-10-03 11:49:46 +0200:
Based on earlier work by Raul Gutierrez and Walter Bender.
[...]
Looks good, thanks!
Acked-By: Sascha Silbe si...@activitycentral.com
pushed,
'/ofw' is not used anymore on the XO, '/proc/device-tree' is used now
instead. Instead of just adjusting for that change we took the
chance to make the section hardware independent. As the firmware
version we display the bios version if available on non XO
hardware. As ethtool has become a
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
Hmm, the original bug that git fixed by that was #1717 [1] from the
description: Since we do not supply a keyboard model by default, xfree86
gets picked up, and as a result the arrow keys, etc do not work on Xephyr.
On 10/07/2011 08:47 PM, godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
From: Gonzalo Odiardgodi...@gmail.com
The neighboard view use alpha to show the applied filter.
When the state of a ap change the graphic representation
is updated and the alpha should be restored acording the filter value.
v2 - As suggested
Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of 2011-10-09 12:54:40 +0200:
@@ -58,6 +58,8 @@ def get_serial_number():
serial_no = _read_file(os.path.join(_OFW_TREE, _SN))
elif os.path.exists(os.path.join(_PROC_TREE, _SN)):
serial_no =
'/ofw' is not used anymore on the XO, '/proc/device-tree' is used now
instead. Instead of just adjusting for that change we took the
chance to make the section hardware independent. As the firmware
version we display the bios version if available on non XO
hardware. As ethtool has become a
On 10/09/2011 05:22 PM, Sascha Silbe wrote:
Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of 2011-10-09 12:54:40 +0200:
@@ -58,6 +58,8 @@ def get_serial_number():
serial_no = _read_file(os.path.join(_OFW_TREE, _SN))
elif os.path.exists(os.path.join(_PROC_TREE, _SN)):
Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of 2011-10-09 18:01:35 +0200:
The serial number is often only readable by root on non-XO
hardware, that is why we do not read it. If the serial number
can not be found on an XO we display the entry as 'Not available'.
[...]
-def get_firmware_number():
Hi All,
Sugar on a Stick v5 is ready to go (finally). The website will be
updated shortly. When it is all details will be here
http://spins.fedoraproject.org/soas/
Improvements over SoaSv4 include:
- Sugar 0.92.4
- Fedora 15
- Network Manager 0.9 support (massive thanks to dsd!)
- More
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Sugar on a Stick v5 is ready to go (finally).
Great news. Thanks for all the hard work. And thanks to everyone who
contributed!!
-walter
The website will be
updated shortly. When it is all details will be
And replying to myself.
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Sugar on a Stick v5 is ready to go (finally). The website will be
updated shortly. When it is all details will be here
http://spins.fedoraproject.org/soas/
Improvements over
- Original Message -
From: Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com
To: sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org; Development of live Sugar
distributions s...@lists.sugarlabs.org; Sugar Labs Marketing
market...@lists.sugarlabs.org
Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2011 3:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel]
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Art Hunkins abhun...@uncg.edu wrote:
- Original Message - From: Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com
To: sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org; Development of live Sugar
distributions s...@lists.sugarlabs.org; Sugar Labs Marketing
market...@lists.sugarlabs.org
Peter Robinson wrote:
Hi All,
Sugar on a Stick v5 is ready to go (finally). The website will be
updated shortly. When it is all details will be here
http://spins.fedoraproject.org/soas/
Congratulations
Will the surf-115.xo on ASLO get a revision for use with sugar 0.93-94.x?
Thanks
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Thomas C Gilliard
satel...@bendbroadband.com wrote:
Peter Robinson wrote:
Hi All,
Sugar on a Stick v5 is ready to go (finally). The website will be
updated shortly. When it is all details will be here
http://spins.fedoraproject.org/soas/
Peter Robinson wrote:
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Thomas C Gilliard
satel...@bendbroadband.com wrote:
Peter Robinson wrote:
Hi All,
Sugar on a Stick v5 is ready to go (finally). The website will be
updated shortly. When it is all details will be here
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Thomas C Gilliard
satel...@bendbroadband.com wrote:
Peter Robinson wrote:
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Thomas C Gilliard
satel...@bendbroadband.com wrote:
Peter Robinson wrote:
Hi All,
Sugar on a Stick v5 is ready to go (finally). The website will
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
And replying to myself.
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi All,
Sugar on a Stick v5 is ready to go (finally). The website will be
updated shortly. When it is all
Hello!
I want to downgrading the firmware of an XO 1.0 for the Q2E45 to Q2E41...
The information in the Wiki I don't understand...
Is an secure laptop (not have Ok prompt)..
Regards
Alan ___
Sugar-devel mailing list
I, David Farning, would like to announce my candidacy for a position
on the Sugar Labs Oversight Board.
As a member on the original Sugar Labs Oversight Board, I came to feel
that as much as I believed in the vision of OLPC and Sugar Labs there
were a number of needs in the ecosystem which could
Hello!
I want to downgrading the firmware of an XO 1.0 for the Q2E45 to Q2E41...
The information in the Wiki I don't understand...
Is an secure laptop (not have Ok prompt)..
Regards
Alan
Obtain a developer key, disable security, then use the flash command.
(I don't believe signed firmware installation method on secured laptop
will permit downgrade.)
You may find de...@lists.laptop.org more appropriate than sugar-devel@
for XO-1 related firmware questions.
Please identify which
26 matches
Mail list logo
