Re: [Sugar-devel] FW: scratch on aslo
On Sat, 2011-12-17 at 00:11 -0500, Samuel Klein wrote: I understand why Scratch isn't hosted on aslo at present, but it would be nice if it were hosted in a fashion that supported discovery of and review/discussion of it. Scratch is Sugar's most popular programming activity, after all... A few months ago it sounded like the Media Lab was going to correct the binary license of Scratch. Has anyone heard back from them? Cc'ing Mako and Claudia who might know the right person to ask. -- Bernie Innocenti Sugar Labs Infrastructure Team http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Infrastructure_Team ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH sugar-toolkit-gtk3] Add MAINTAINERS file
On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 19:55 +, Daniel Drake wrote: Just point at the wiki where the info is kept. Requested by Sascha Silbe. --- MAINTAINERS |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 MAINTAINERS diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS new file mode 100644 index 000..379f8ba --- /dev/null +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +See http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Release/Modules Great. Can we do the same for all modules? -- Bernie Innocenti Sugar Labs Infrastructure Team http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Infrastructure_Team ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH sugar-toolkit-gtk3] Add MAINTAINERS file
On Sat, 2011-12-17 at 19:03 -0500, Bernie Innocenti wrote: On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 19:55 +, Daniel Drake wrote: Just point at the wiki where the info is kept. Requested by Sascha Silbe. --- MAINTAINERS |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 MAINTAINERS diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS new file mode 100644 index 000..379f8ba --- /dev/null +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +See http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Release/Modules Great. Can we do the same for all modules? I mean: replacing the MAINTAINERS file with a simple link to the wiki page. Looking at the wiki page, I just noticed that sugar-toolkit-gtk3 is maintained by you and Simon, which makes it different from all the other modules. Presently it doesn't really matter, but when the rest of glucose switches to gtk3, this arrangement would bring us back to the time when getting any non-trivial change merged required seeking the combined approval of multiple module maintainers. So I'd propose that we continue to have glucose share the same set maintainers, either by making Silbe co-maintain sugar-toolkit-gtk3, or by adding you to the other glucose modules. I think it's important to keep our review process smooth and avoid frustrating our contributors with patches stuck in a half-approved state. -- _ // Bernie Innocenti \X/ http://codewiz.org ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
