[Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release Words-14
Activity Homepage: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4315 Sugar Platform: 0.82 - 0.96 Download Now: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/27870/words-14.xo Release notes: * Reassuring En pronunciation. * New translations. Sugar Labs Activities http://activities.sugarlabs.org ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Browse and the move to WebKit
On 12-02-17 at 05:33am, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > better news: i've just confirmed that: > > a) the removal of js_push_context and pop context was a spurious >error, those functions are now restored, confirmed as compiling and >existing (untested) > b) the "usual" critical pyjamas-desktop tests, Helloworld, >JSONRPCExample, KitchenSink and Mail all have the exact same >behaviour as they used to, way back before the xpcom API breakage >[where we all had to wait for todd whiteman to update pyxpcom] > > this is really really good news because it means that the people who > have been keeping an eye on the debian packaging of hulahop and have > been going "arse! it's fecked!" quite a lot will now be happy that it > all works, and i am confident that within a few weeks/months people > will be able to do "apt-get install pyjamas-desktop python-hulahop" > again and have it all work. This is indeed quite exciting. Looking at your patch now and hopefully able to release a working Hulahop for Debian. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Fedora Sugar Test Day - Test case content, location
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Samuel Greenfeld wrote: > So we need to come up with a location & design that has a set of test cases s/need/could try to/ -- don't let yak shaving get in the way of the actual goal. IOWs, the current status is imperfect, but it doesn't block you in the least from hving a successful test day. In fact, it's not even a factor. Participants are a factor there, and a nice update to the testcases can make it more productive. cheers, m -- martin.langh...@gmail.com mar...@laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
[Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release Pippy-46
Activity Homepage: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4041 Sugar Platform: 0.82 - 0.96 Download Now: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/27869/pippy-46.xo Release notes: *Cleaning debug code that was causing an error, pep8 fix == Sources == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Pippy/Pippy-46.tar.bz2 Sugar Labs Activities http://activities.sugarlabs.org ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [Testing] Fedora Sugar Test Day - Test case content, location
Fedora test days historically have been Thursdays to help make it a regular event that's easy to schedule around: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Fedora_17_test_days If there is significant interest for another day of the week, we can consider asking for it. On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:41 AM, rihowa...@gmail.com wrote: > > > On Feb 16, 2012, at 11:36 AM, Samuel Greenfeld wrote: > > > On March 22 there will be a Sugar test day for Fedora 17. This means > that the Fedora community in general will be gathering to look at Sugar and > see what issues we have close to the end of the Sugar 0.96 cycle. > > > > March 22nd is a Thursday. Is the March 22nd date for Sugar Test Day set > in stone? Picking a Thursday is a bit unfortunate because a lot of > volunteers with experience of Sugar will either be at their jobs or school. > Now if it was on a weekend > > Robert H. > > > To help keep track of what was found and tell people where to look, we > ideally should have test cases for the volunteers willing to help us that > day that may be unfamiliar with Sugar. But the first question I have is > where these test cases should be hosted. > > > > Historically OLPC has tried to use their wiki with some semantic markup > to store test cases & results for both the XO and Sugar. But this setup is > not easily searched, is prone to caching old information unless the Wiki > pages are "purged", and can get confusing if you have to support later test > plans and/or updated test case versions. > > > > Fedora also stores test cases in their Wiki, and links them to packages > in Bodhi to help in verification. They take a simpler approach to their > Wiki design than what OLPC uses. Fedora supposedly was to move to a test > case management system called Nitrate to match Red Hat, but to date this > has not happened. > > > > A year or so ago I had a wild idea to create a system where test cases > and results could be exchanged so Ubuntu users could see how a program > worked in Fedora, what upstream saw, etc. But this has yet to materialize > beyond a few sketches. > > > > So we need to come up with a location & design that has a set of test > cases & results that everyone (including Ubuntu, etc.) can consider > authoritative & up-to-date for testing Sugar, and ideally support test > cases for XO hardware, the school server, etc. as well. > > > > --- > > SJG > > ___ > > Testing mailing list > > test...@lists.laptop.org > > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/testing > > ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [Testing] Fedora Sugar Test Day - Test case content, location
On Feb 16, 2012, at 11:36 AM, Samuel Greenfeld wrote: > On March 22 there will be a Sugar test day for Fedora 17. This means that > the Fedora community in general will be gathering to look at Sugar and see > what issues we have close to the end of the Sugar 0.96 cycle. > March 22nd is a Thursday. Is the March 22nd date for Sugar Test Day set in stone? Picking a Thursday is a bit unfortunate because a lot of volunteers with experience of Sugar will either be at their jobs or school. Now if it was on a weekend Robert H. > To help keep track of what was found and tell people where to look, we > ideally should have test cases for the volunteers willing to help us that day > that may be unfamiliar with Sugar. But the first question I have is where > these test cases should be hosted. > > Historically OLPC has tried to use their wiki with some semantic markup to > store test cases & results for both the XO and Sugar. But this setup is not > easily searched, is prone to caching old information unless the Wiki pages > are "purged", and can get confusing if you have to support later test plans > and/or updated test case versions. > > Fedora also stores test cases in their Wiki, and links them to packages in > Bodhi to help in verification. They take a simpler approach to their Wiki > design than what OLPC uses. Fedora supposedly was to move to a test case > management system called Nitrate to match Red Hat, but to date this has not > happened. > > A year or so ago I had a wild idea to create a system where test cases and > results could be exchanged so Ubuntu users could see how a program worked in > Fedora, what upstream saw, etc. But this has yet to materialize beyond a few > sketches. > > So we need to come up with a location & design that has a set of test cases & > results that everyone (including Ubuntu, etc.) can consider authoritative & > up-to-date for testing Sugar, and ideally support test cases for XO hardware, > the school server, etc. as well. > > --- > SJG > ___ > Testing mailing list > test...@lists.laptop.org > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/testing ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] error in ./sugar-jhbuild update
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote: > On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Kalpa Welivitigoda > wrote: >> 2012/2/10 Simon Schampijer : >>> On 02/10/2012 11:48 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote: On 02/10/2012 06:39 AM, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote: > > Hi, > > I was trying to build sugar base system as instruction at here [1] and > I got this error message, > > ./sugar-jhbuild update > Cloning upstream jhbuild > Cloning into jhbuild... > remote: Counting objects: 30895, done. > remote: Compressing objects: 100% (8597/8597), done. > remote: Total 30895 (delta 23961), reused 28682 (delta 22191) > Receiving objects: 100% (30895/30895), 6.00 MiB | 118 KiB/s, done. > Resolving deltas: 100% (23961/23961), done. > Warning: unknown distro version, automatic fallback to rawhide. Sidenote: maybe we should define configs for the Fedora releases... >>> >>> >>> Sascha, attached is a patch that should update the Fedora deps. I moved the >>> 'gnome-python2-evince' dep to the individual Fedora-version configs that >>> need it, and created the missing F14-F16 configs. >>> >> >> still there are errors. Find the attached file >> > > FYI, > I'm on Fedora 16 (64-bit) > I just removed /home/kalpa/.local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/jhbuild and now it all works fine. Thanks for all your troubles. >>> Regards, >>> Simon >>> >>> ___ >>> Sugar-devel mailing list >>> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org >>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Best Regards, >> >> Kalpa Pathum Welivitigoda >> http://about.me/callkalpa > > > > -- > Best Regards, > > Kalpa Pathum Welivitigoda > http://about.me/callkalpa -- Best Regards, Kalpa Pathum Welivitigoda http://about.me/callkalpa ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
