Changes of version-2 over version-1 ::
===
Now using tabs throughtouts for spacing, so that the patch is properly
formatted/laid-out.
Thanks a ton to James Cameron (qu...@laptop.org) !!!
bin/sugar-session | 7 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff
Probably lacking an update from the NM-0.8 era, _update_state does
not correctly handle NM_DEVICE_STATE_IP_CHECK and
NM_DEVICE_STATE_SECONDARIES (triggered late in the connection-establishing
process after NM_DEVICE_STATE_IP_CONFIG).
This was causing backtraces like:
File
The difference is, there are a time race between icon reading,
and displaying, at times, as the file is a tempfile,
at the moment of display was already deleted.
Is the code deleting the file? Otherwise who deletes it?
In /etc/fstab I see the line:
/tmp/tmptmpfsrw,size=50m
Activity Homepage:
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4024
Sugar Platform:
0.98 - 0.98
Download Now:
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/28388/browse-149.xo
Release notes:
Sync with toolkit change for palettes.
Sugar Labs Activities
http://activities.sugarlabs.org
Activity Homepage:
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4623
Sugar Platform:
0.82 - 0.98
Download Now:
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/28389/feliz_navidad-2.xo
Release notes:
ENHANCEMENTS:
*Updated the icon
*Added support for gnome
Sugar Labs Activities
2012/12/11 Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org:
In the meantime, have the icons cached in a directory is no so bad.
Maybe we can do it in /tmp/ to get it deleted at startup
without need more
Yes, I think using /tmp is the way to go. And the Journal is doing
that for the same icon in the palette
On 11 December 2012 14:19, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote:
2012/12/11 Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org:
In the meantime, have the icons cached in a directory is no so bad.
Maybe we can do it in /tmp/ to get it deleted at startup
without need more
Yes, I think using /tmp is the way
The play outside release.
== Source ==
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-base/sugar-base-0.98.0.tar.bz2
== News ==
* Release 0.98.0 (Simon Schampijer)
* Allow to build outside source directory (Daniel Narvaez)
___
Hi,
We are planning to port Sugar on Android and are faced with these options:
1. Sugar as an application on Android.
2. As a platform on top of the Linux platform.
Can the Sugar build be used to create an app bundle to deploy to the app
store? Are there any licensing issues?
On 2., can
I think Sugar could be something like an alternative gui shell similar
cynogen http://www.cyanogenmod.org/
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 9:24 AM, RJV jv.ravichand...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We are planning to port Sugar on Android and are faced with these options:
1. Sugar as an application on
Hi Rajiv,
your plan seems to have good goals, but is missing some understanding
of what you can and cannot do.
You cannot run Sugar (a Python-based window manager, based on
traditional Linux sw stack) on the Android stack. Way too different.
To reach your goals, however, you could try something
Thanks, Martin. Btw, where did you deduce the name Rajiv from? :)
RJv
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.comwrote:
Implement a shell -- replacing the standard Android shell -- that
has the main features of Sugar shell
--
Regards,
*Ravichandran J.V.*
I'm sorry! Looks like I misread your name. A faux pass typical of
borderline autistic people -- get all the technical details clearly,
mess up the other person's name.
Hope the technical part was useful. No offense intended.
cheers,
martin
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 3:12 PM, RJV
Some initial data when running on my laptop:
* I dropped kernel caches with echo 3 /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
* The start time has been taken as early as possible, after importing
sugar3.logger and logging
* The end time is at the first map event on the HomeWindow (seems to
correspond well with
On 11 December 2012 07:42, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
I think actually there is a good reason. The OLPC XO boot design is
that the XO man is always visible - from the
Thanks. Good method, good data, no significant regression on your
laptop.
Yes, a test on an XO would be interesting.
Yes, buildbot supervised timing would be interesting.
Yes, activity startup should be a priority too.
Nine seconds seems a lot. I wonder what is consuming that time?
On Tue,
On 11 December 2012 07:51, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
This might be a good idea, but it would also mean that Sugar and
activities share no settings at all with GNOME in cases where that
might be desirable. I can't immediately think of any pitfalls, but
this does needs some extra
Implement a shell -- replacing the standard Android shell -- that has the
main features of Sugar shell
This looks like the nearest to what I hope to achieve - the same experience
of the XO on a hand-held device especially the Ad-Hoc networking.
Jv
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:01 AM, Martin
18 matches
Mail list logo
