El 16/04/13 00:03, Bernie Innocenti escribió:
Our wiki has grown quite large and the upgrade from Mediawiki 1.19 to
1.20 required several slow steps, so unfortunately I had to leave before
fixing up the local wikis.
I ran maintenance/update scripts for:
pe.sugarlabs.org
cl.sugarlabs.org
ar.su
The PaletteWindow lost the horizontal padding when it started to be
used as replacement of palette menus. So now each implementation has
to add the padding.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Quiñones
---
src/sugar3/graphics/colorbutton.py | 7 ++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --
Dear Amit,
I'm sorry that I took so long to reply.
I'm excited that you are interested in the Platform team's project to
support a distribution which
the Peru community/local lab is proposing as basis for deployment in Peru.
Currently we're about to reach 1.0 for Deployment Platform for XO
la
On 17 April 2013 19:40, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>
>> Coming back to this point...
>>
>> I think supporting an existing webapps framework (hopefully a standard at
>> some point) with it's system API, manifest, permissions etc, is important
>> also if the goal is just to get some Sugar activities run
Hey,
lots of interesting projects and good points. We already discussed a bit in
IRC, but reposting here for everyone.
The most important choice seems to be be about adopting a full toolkit or
stick to plain html/javascript. From your list it seems like we have at
least three that should be evalu
>
>
> Coming back to this point...
>
> I think supporting an existing webapps framework (hopefully a standard at
> some point) with it's system API, manifest, permissions etc, is important
> also if the goal is just to get some Sugar activities running on other
> platforms.
>
> For example, even *i
On 17 April 2013 19:20, Daniel Drake wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Daniel Narvaez
> wrote:
> > But is WebKit so much better? For example the WebKit2 decision _seems_ to
> > have been made by Apple engineers without even talking to major
> > contributors. The gtk bits are maintained t
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> But is WebKit so much better? For example the WebKit2 decision _seems_ to
> have been made by Apple engineers without even talking to major
> contributors. The gtk bits are maintained the way we would like them to
> but... I'm not sure that
On 17 April 2013 17:39, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> On 17 April 2013 16:26, Daniel Drake wrote:
>
> So the real benefit of the Chrome thing is the system integration? Is
>> that something really needed for Sugar? It would be necessary if we
>> were to port *all* Sugar activities to javascript, but
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> On the negative side, gobject-introspection cross compilation still sounds
> like a mess
>
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=592311
I worked on that code for a while at litl. Probably the best bet is
to not try to cross-compile,
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Michael Perscheid
> Subject:ANN] Four new OLPC Games by the Software Architecture Group
> Date: 16. April 2013 08:22:27 GMT-07:00
> To: Squeak in Germany / Squeak in Deutschland
>
> Reply-To: Squeak in Germany / Squeak in Deutschland
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> we'd l
Thanks Daniel. Lots of interesting points here!
On 17 April 2013 16:26, Daniel Drake wrote:
> So the real benefit of the Chrome thing is the system integration? Is
> that something really needed for Sugar? It would be necessary if we
> were to port *all* Sugar activities to javascript, but I am
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> I might not have yet made explicit what a web application provides on the
> top of an html page loaded in a browser, which is what we get with 1. Taking
> a look to the Chromium documentation is a good way to get an idea of it.
>
> http://de
Hi,
For our web activities, we need to code our widgets or components.
Example of widgets are: the activity toolbar and subtoolbars, a slider
control, a palette.
There are different approaches to this. Yesterday I discussed some
with C. Scott by IRC. Here is the wrap up, IRC log at the bottom.
On 04/13/2013 02:42 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
On 12 April 2013 23:18, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Hi Lionel,
we are more or less understanding each other :) I think there are really
three possible steps
1 A WebView with an html5/javascript based sugar-toolkit
2 Support for web activities along wit
> we are going to kick off the work on HTML activities for 0.100 with a
meeting.
>
> Time: 22 April 2013 (14:00 UTC)
> Place: #sugar-meeting (freenode)
Great. Nice summary.
I will try to be there.
Lionel.
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar
Hi Jared,
(forwarding to the mailing list)
2013/4/17 Jared :
> On 04/16/2013 07:23 AM, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jared,
>>
>> 2013/4/16 Jared:
>>>
>>> Hello all, my name is Jared and I'm currently working on contributing to
>>> the
>>> TamTamJam sugar activity as part of an assignment for m
Yeah, but the idea is that web applications we write for Sugar will not
require an internet connection...
On 17 April 2013 13:40, Ignacio Rodríguez wrote:
> Yes..
>
>
> 2013/4/17 Daniel Narvaez
>
>> Hi Ignacio,
>>
>> you mean many existing chromium web applications requires an internet
>> conne
Yes..
2013/4/17 Daniel Narvaez
> Hi Ignacio,
>
> you mean many existing chromium web applications requires an internet
> connection?
>
> On 17 April 2013 12:37, Ignacio Rodríguez wrote:
>
>> "> * Chromium integration.(..)"
>>
>> Many applications require connection for use.
>>
>>
>>
>> 2013/4/
On 17 April 2013 12:31, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> Hey Daniel,
>
> I have an extension that is using management.getAll [1] to collect the
> extension info. I could not find any info about
> chrome.runtime.connectNative, it is not part of [2], do you have any
> pointers?
>
Hi Simon,
it's not quit
Hi Ignacio,
you mean many existing chromium web applications requires an internet
connection?
On 17 April 2013 12:37, Ignacio Rodríguez wrote:
> "> * Chromium integration.(..)"
>
> Many applications require connection for use.
>
>
>
> 2013/4/17 Daniel Narvaez
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> we are going to
"> * Chromium integration.(..)"
Many applications require connection for use.
2013/4/17 Daniel Narvaez
> Hello,
>
> we are going to kick off the work on HTML activities for 0.100 with a
> meeting.
>
> Time: 22 April 2013 (14:00 UTC)
> Place: #sugar-meeting (freenode)
>
> It would be really us
On 04/11/2013 09:52 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Hello,
I spent some time today thinking and experimenting with Chromium
integration and I have a more detailed plan to propose now.
There is an important premise to be made. In both Chromium and Firefox OS,
application's installation is very much in
Hello,
we are going to kick off the work on HTML activities for 0.100 with a
meeting.
Time: 22 April 2013 (14:00 UTC)
Place: #sugar-meeting (freenode)
It would be really useful to know how many people are interested to
contribute, so please try to participate or, if you can't, let us know that
y
24 matches
Mail list logo
