[Sugar-devel] Problems during git pull
Hi all. Whenever I am trying to pull from any repository, I am getting the message :: # [ajay@localhost sugar]$ git pull git.sugarlabs.org[0: 18.85.44.69]: errno=Connection refused fatal: unable to connect a socket (Connection refused # Any ideas what might be wrong? Everything seemed to work fine till yesterday. Regards, Ajay Garg Dextrose Developer Activity Central: http://activitycentral.com ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Problems during git pull
Need to do a git checkout first I think. On 4/24/13, Ajay Garg a...@activitycentral.com wrote: Hi all. Whenever I am trying to pull from any repository, I am getting the message :: # [ajay@localhost sugar]$ git pull git.sugarlabs.org[0: 18.85.44.69]: errno=Connection refused fatal: unable to connect a socket (Connection refused # Any ideas what might be wrong? Everything seemed to work fine till yesterday. Regards, Ajay Garg Dextrose Developer Activity Central: http://activitycentral.com -- Alexandro Colorado Apache OpenOffice Contributor http://es.openoffice.org ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Problems during git pull
I get the same. $ git pull fatal: unable to connect to git.sugarlabs.org: git.sugarlabs.org[0: 18.85.44.69]: errno=Connection refused $ git remote -v origin git://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar/mainline.git (fetch) origin git://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar/mainline.git (push) $ -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Problems during git pull
Already fixed, it seems? I can git pull. 2013/4/24 James Cameron qu...@laptop.org: I get the same. $ git pull fatal: unable to connect to git.sugarlabs.org: git.sugarlabs.org[0: 18.85.44.69]: errno=Connection refused $ git remote -v origin git://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar/mainline.git (fetch) origin git://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar/mainline.git (push) $ -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- .. manuq .. ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Problems during git pull
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote: Already fixed, it seems? Yes, it is !! Thanks to the solver-who-prefers-to-be-hidden :) I can git pull. 2013/4/24 James Cameron qu...@laptop.org: I get the same. $ git pull fatal: unable to connect to git.sugarlabs.org: git.sugarlabs.org[0: 18.85.44.69]: errno=Connection refused $ git remote -v origin git://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar/mainline.git (fetch) origin git://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar/mainline.git (push) $ -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- .. manuq .. -- Regards, Ajay Garg Dextrose Developer Activity Central: http://activitycentral.com On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote: Already fixed, it seems? I can git pull. 2013/4/24 James Cameron qu...@laptop.org: I get the same. $ git pull fatal: unable to connect to git.sugarlabs.org: git.sugarlabs.org[0: 18.85.44.69]: errno=Connection refused $ git remote -v origin git://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar/mainline.git (fetch) origin git://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar/mainline.git (push) $ -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- .. manuq .. -- Regards, Ajay Garg Dextrose Developer Activity Central: http://activitycentral.com ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build disruption
Things should be back working now. When you update, it's probably better to make a new clone. If you find an issue please let me know. On 23 April 2013 02:21, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: I'm making changes to the sugar-build configuration, mostly to add WebKit 2.0. Things are likely to be a bit unstable for a couple of days. Don't pull or checkout ed5cdf0http://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar-build/sugar-build/commit/ed5cdf0ad28ceec92587af796ff723574a1a71b4, if you want stability :) -- Daniel Narvaez -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Problems during git pull
It seems to be down again... On 24 April 2013 14:35, Ajay Garg a...@activitycentral.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote: Already fixed, it seems? Yes, it is !! Thanks to the solver-who-prefers-to-be-hidden :) I can git pull. 2013/4/24 James Cameron qu...@laptop.org: I get the same. $ git pull fatal: unable to connect to git.sugarlabs.org: git.sugarlabs.org[0: 18.85.44.69]: errno=Connection refused $ git remote -v origin git://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar/mainline.git (fetch) origin git://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar/mainline.git (push) $ -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- .. manuq .. -- Regards, Ajay Garg Dextrose Developer Activity Central: http://activitycentral.com On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote: Already fixed, it seems? I can git pull. 2013/4/24 James Cameron qu...@laptop.org: I get the same. $ git pull fatal: unable to connect to git.sugarlabs.org: git.sugarlabs.org[0: 18.85.44.69]: errno=Connection refused $ git remote -v origin git://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar/mainline.git (fetch) origin git://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar/mainline.git (push) $ -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- .. manuq .. -- Regards, Ajay Garg Dextrose Developer Activity Central: http://activitycentral.com ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] Color Palette: get back horizontal padding - SL #4325
On 04/19/2013 03:51 PM, Manuel Quiñones wrote: 2013/4/18 Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de: Hi Manuel, your patch does fix the Write-Color-Palette. Which is the Abacus-Palette, the custom one? Is Walter aware of this fix and would remove his workaround (at least in master)? Yes, the Abacus palette is the custom one. I'm prepared to let Walter know about this change at the moment its commited so he can remove the workaround. Gonzalo workarounded Paint too. Code looks good, please push, as well to 0.98. I have sent a new patch which adds padding as optional parameter. I think it is better API. What do you think? -- .. manuq .. The API is good, but as you add API you can not push as-is to the 0.98 branch. You can push the first one there. Simon ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
[Sugar-devel] Moving to github
Hello, I suggest that we move to github permanently. * The workflow is better than both mailing list and trac. Anyone interested can subscribe and see all the patches being posted. And patches are not lost because we have a list of outstanding ones. These are the major features that was not covered by the other tools. A better tool won't solve the core of our reviews problems (we need more people to get involved) but I think it's an improvement anyway. * github is the cool place to be these days :) * People are getting used to the pull request workflow, so we would lower the barrier. * Someone else is maintaining the service. We are having too many downtimes imo for something critical like code repositories. This is about the core modules. I'm not sure about activities. -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Moving to github
Hi, On Wed, Apr 24 2013, Daniel Narvaez wrote: I suggest that we move to github permanently. +1. I think I opposed this in the past, but it's clear that Github has become the de facto place to collaborate on free software, and I suspect we're losing potential contributors by not being there. I think we should continue to use our own Trac instance rather than Github Issues, though, to avoid depending on their non-free code any more than we will be already (which isn't much, IMO). Thanks for investigating this! - Chris. -- Chris Ball c...@laptop.org http://printf.net/ One Laptop Per Child ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] Color Palette: get back horizontal padding - SL #4325
2013/4/24 Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de: On 04/19/2013 03:51 PM, Manuel Quiñones wrote: 2013/4/18 Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de: Hi Manuel, your patch does fix the Write-Color-Palette. Which is the Abacus-Palette, the custom one? Is Walter aware of this fix and would remove his workaround (at least in master)? Yes, the Abacus palette is the custom one. I'm prepared to let Walter know about this change at the moment its commited so he can remove the workaround. Gonzalo workarounded Paint too. Code looks good, please push, as well to 0.98. I have sent a new patch which adds padding as optional parameter. I think it is better API. What do you think? -- .. manuq .. The API is good, but as you add API you can not push as-is to the 0.98 branch. You can push the first one there. Ok! As it was adding an optional argument I thought we could. By the way the first one was merged in master already, so I will cherrypick from there before next release. Thanks, -- .. manuq .. ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Moving to github
2013/4/24 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com: Hello, I suggest that we move to github permanently. After this testing period, I conclude that I like the workflow in github more than the previous. The web interface is better in my opinion. Might be because it is subject to more user feedback. Looking at their blog you can see it is in active development. * The workflow is better than both mailing list and trac. Anyone interested can subscribe and see all the patches being posted. And patches are not lost because we have a list of outstanding ones. These are the major features that was not covered by the other tools. A better tool won't solve the core of our reviews problems (we need more people to get involved) but I think it's an improvement anyway. * github is the cool place to be these days :) Yeah, not just to be cool, but because the ecosystem there is nice, thinking in getting more contributors. Is good to be in the same place as other projects, specially while heading for webapps. -- .. manuq .. ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Moving to github
On 24 April 2013 19:22, Ruben Rodríguez qui...@sugarlabs.org wrote: 2013/4/24 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com: Hello, I suggest that we move to github permanently. Why not gitorious, either keeping the current one or moving to gitorious.org? While it's more or less the same workflow, I think github has a more polished user interface. Also it is a lot more popular. Chris and Manuel explained better then me why that's important. I'll also mention that we wouldn't introduce much of a dependency on non-free software, it's very easy to move git repositories around. Chris is probably right that we should avoid using their bug tracker (until they release the source :P), it would make migrating away much more complicated. ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Moving to github
This is about the core modules. I'm not sure about activities. I have doubts about if have some value for activities. There are a lot of repositories, and activities have usually (and sadly) a single developer. Maybe we can start new activities on github? Gonzalo -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Moving to github
On 24 April 2013 20:18, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: This is about the core modules. I'm not sure about activities. I have doubts about if have some value for activities. There are a lot of repositories, and activities have usually (and sadly) a single developer. Maybe we can start new activities on github? The only downside I see is that you wouldn't have a single place where to look for activities (I don't think we want to have all of the them under sugarlabs/, maybe the fructose ones). Though perhaps that place is activities.sugarlabs.org... and you get a link to whatever git repositories from there. ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Moving to github
Other issue is, if we move all to github, we don't need maintain our infrastructure. May be we should ask to the infrastructure team Gonzalo On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: On 24 April 2013 20:18, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: This is about the core modules. I'm not sure about activities. I have doubts about if have some value for activities. There are a lot of repositories, and activities have usually (and sadly) a single developer. Maybe we can start new activities on github? The only downside I see is that you wouldn't have a single place where to look for activities (I don't think we want to have all of the them under sugarlabs/, maybe the fructose ones). Though perhaps that place is activities.sugarlabs.org... and you get a link to whatever git repositories from there. ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Moving to github
I guess it might be complicated to actually get everyone off of git.sugarlabs.org :) Maybe after a while we can just archive the remaining repos or something. On 24 April 2013 20:29, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: Other issue is, if we move all to github, we don't need maintain our infrastructure. May be we should ask to the infrastructure team Gonzalo On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote: On 24 April 2013 20:18, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: This is about the core modules. I'm not sure about activities. I have doubts about if have some value for activities. There are a lot of repositories, and activities have usually (and sadly) a single developer. Maybe we can start new activities on github? The only downside I see is that you wouldn't have a single place where to look for activities (I don't think we want to have all of the them under sugarlabs/, maybe the fructose ones). Though perhaps that place is activities.sugarlabs.org... and you get a link to whatever git repositories from there. -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH Etoys] Use ALSA sound backend if available
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote: On 15.04.2013, at 07:53, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: Extend the sound backend selection code to consider using ALSA. On XO-1.75 and XO-4 this fixes sound in etoys with squeak-vm-4.x. It also fixes XO-4 sound recording which was not working on any previous version. Ping, any news here? Thanks Daniel Ah, I'm sorry, didn't get to it yet. Thanks for the reminder! Another quick reminder for this patch :) Thanks Daniel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
[Sugar-devel] Wiki profile for mentors
I think it would be very useful to have the mentors, update their wiki profile on wiki.suagarlabs.org Since many 'signed' their GSOC proposal but having no profile information makes it impossible to help the students when they want to know more about it. -- Alexandro Colorado Apache OpenOffice Contributor http://es.openoffice.org ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
[Sugar-devel] Network version of Abecedarium: why and how
Hi all, Ive released last week my Abecedarium activity for Sugar 0.96+. One issue with this activity is that, due to number of contents (1500 images and sounds), its size is about 100Mo. We want to deploy the activity on our Nosy Komba deployment this year: 150 XO-1 and 50 XO-1.5. Because weve got other activities to deploy, we compute: - The free space on a XO-1 and XO-1.5 with Sugar 0.96 without any activity: 550 Mo for XO-1, 2645Mo for XO-1.5. - The size of all activities that we planned to install, see the spreadsheet [1]. Unfortunately 100 Mo is too big for the XO-1 with some other big activities (GCompris, Tuxmath, TurtleArt, Speak, ). So I choose to develop a new version named Abecedarium Net [2] without any content included, so with a size of only 6Mo. The idea is to deploy all contents on a school/web server instead of into the activity. A config file in the activity has to be set with the URL of the content, or it could be set from a dialog popup. The activity test the network regularly and display the status. Because Abecedarium is wrote in HTML5, deploying the web server just mean to copy the content of the full activity on the server. Ive explained the full process in the activity description. I will test it myself on our School Server at Madagascar but do not hesitate in the meantime to test it and give me feedback. Best regards from France. Lionel. [1] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ApkC1NVMZoZodDg5em1vaS04VC1vSDd oZ1Z5SHNJUXc#gid=0 [2] http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en/sugar/addon/4661 ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Network version of Abecedarium: why and how
Another thing you may consider is breaking it up into several activities (essentially removing one level hierarchy) and sharing a common database (on the school server or locally). -walter On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:38 PM, lio...@olpc-france.org wrote: Hi all, ** ** I’ve released last week my Abecedarium activity for Sugar 0.96+. One issue with this activity is that, due to number of contents (1500 images and sounds), its size is about 100Mo. ** ** We want to deploy the activity on our Nosy Komba deployment this year: 150 XO-1 and 50 XO-1.5. Because we’ve got other activities to deploy, we compute: **- **The free space on a XO-1 and XO-1.5 with Sugar 0.96 without any activity: 550 Mo for XO-1, 2645Mo for XO-1.5. **- **The size of all activities that we planned to install, see the spreadsheet [1]. Unfortunately 100 Mo is too big for the XO-1 with some other big activities (GCompris, Tuxmath, TurtleArt, Speak, …). ** ** So I choose to develop a new version named “Abecedarium Net” [2] without any content included, so with a size of only 6Mo. The idea is to deploy all contents on a school/web server instead of into the activity. A config file in the activity has to be set with the URL of the content, or it could be set from a dialog popup. The activity test the network regularly and display the status. Because Abecedarium is wrote in HTML5, deploying the web server just mean to copy the content of the full activity on the server. I’ve explained the full process in the activity description. I will test it myself on our School Server at Madagascar but do not hesitate in the meantime to test it and give me feedback. ** ** Best regards from France. ** ** Lionel. ** ** [1] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ApkC1NVMZoZodDg5em1vaS04VC1vSDdoZ1Z5SHNJUXc#gid=0 [2] http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en/sugar/addon/4661 ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Network version of Abecedarium: why and how
Could the HTML5 files be addressed to a locally inserted USB? file:///.. Tom Gilliard satellit On 04/24/2013 01:42 PM, Walter Bender wrote: Another thing you may consider is breaking it up into several activities (essentially removing one level hierarchy) and sharing a common database (on the school server or locally). -walter On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:38 PM, lio...@olpc-france.org mailto:lio...@olpc-france.org wrote: Hi all, I've released last week my Abecedarium activity for Sugar 0.96+. One issue with this activity is that, due to number of contents (1500 images and sounds), its size is about 100Mo. We want to deploy the activity on our Nosy Komba deployment this year: 150 XO-1 and 50 XO-1.5. Because we've got other activities to deploy, we compute: -The free space on a XO-1 and XO-1.5 with Sugar 0.96 without any activity: 550 Mo for XO-1, 2645Mo for XO-1.5. -The size of all activities that we planned to install, see the spreadsheet [1]. Unfortunately 100 Mo is too big for the XO-1 with some other big activities (GCompris, Tuxmath, TurtleArt, Speak, ...). So I choose to develop a new version named Abecedarium Net [2] without any content included, so with a size of only 6Mo. The idea is to deploy all contents on a school/web server instead of into the activity. A config file in the activity has to be set with the URL of the content, or it could be set from a dialog popup. The activity test the network regularly and display the status. Because Abecedarium is wrote in HTML5, deploying the web server just mean to copy the content of the full activity on the server. I've explained the full process in the activity description. I will test it myself on our School Server at Madagascar but do not hesitate in the meantime to test it and give me feedback. Best regards from France. Lionel. [1] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ApkC1NVMZoZodDg5em1vaS04VC1vSDdoZ1Z5SHNJUXc#gid=0 [2] http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en/sugar/addon/4661 ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Network version of Abecedarium: why and how
Hi Lionel, Almost 65 MB are in the html/images/database directory, I think you can reduce the size of these images to 1/4 of the actual size, just saving as gif or jpg and playing a little with the properties, without loosing too much quality. I tried with one on gimp, but you can use imagemagick or similar to reprocess all the directory Look: [gonzalo@localhost abc]$ ls -l total 152 -rw-rw-r--. 1 gonzalo gonzalo 19228 abr 24 17:59 accountant2.jpg -rw-rw-r--. 1 gonzalo gonzalo 16029 abr 24 17:59 accountant3.jpg -rw-rw-r--. 1 gonzalo gonzalo 21789 abr 24 17:56 accountant.gif -rw-rw-r--. 1 gonzalo gonzalo 28391 abr 24 17:57 accountant.jpg -rw-r--r--. 1 gonzalo gonzalo 62549 dic 9 22:57 accountant.png (accountant2.jpg is with quality 70% and accountant3.jpg with 50%) I don't know about the audio, but maybe is possible improve there too. I would like have the list of words represented on these images on pootle. I imagine many activities can use this if is a shared resource. On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 5:38 PM, lio...@olpc-france.org wrote: Hi all, ** ** I’ve released last week my Abecedarium activity for Sugar 0.96+. One issue with this activity is that, due to number of contents (1500 images and sounds), its size is about 100Mo. ** ** We want to deploy the activity on our Nosy Komba deployment this year: 150 XO-1 and 50 XO-1.5. Because we’ve got other activities to deploy, we compute: **- **The free space on a XO-1 and XO-1.5 with Sugar 0.96 without any activity: 550 Mo for XO-1, 2645Mo for XO-1.5. **- **The size of all activities that we planned to install, see the spreadsheet [1]. Unfortunately 100 Mo is too big for the XO-1 with some other big activities (GCompris, Tuxmath, TurtleArt, Speak, …). ** ** So I choose to develop a new version named “Abecedarium Net” [2] without any content included, so with a size of only 6Mo. The idea is to deploy all contents on a school/web server instead of into the activity. A config file in the activity has to be set with the URL of the content, or it could be set from a dialog popup. The activity test the network regularly and display the status. Because Abecedarium is wrote in HTML5, deploying the web server just mean to copy the content of the full activity on the server. I’ve explained the full process in the activity description. I will test it myself on our School Server at Madagascar but do not hesitate in the meantime to test it and give me feedback. ** ** Best regards from France. ** ** Lionel. ** ** [1] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ApkC1NVMZoZodDg5em1vaS04VC1vSDdoZ1Z5SHNJUXc#gid=0 [2] http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en/sugar/addon/4661 ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Problems during git pull
I'm only have problem with the read-only links (git://..).. the links who accessvia ssh I not have problems.. Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 15:04:01 +0200 From: dwnarv...@gmail.com To: a...@activitycentral.com CC: sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org; qu...@laptop.org; ma...@laptop.org Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] Problems during git pull It seems to be down again... On 24 April 2013 14:35, Ajay Garg a...@activitycentral.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote: Already fixed, it seems? Yes, it is !! Thanks to the solver-who-prefers-to-be-hidden :) I can git pull. 2013/4/24 James Cameron qu...@laptop.org: I get the same. $ git pull fatal: unable to connect to git.sugarlabs.org: git.sugarlabs.org[0: 18.85.44.69]: errno=Connection refused $ git remote -v origin git://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar/mainline.git (fetch) origin git://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar/mainline.git (push) $ -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- .. manuq .. -- Regards, Ajay GargDextrose Developer Activity Central: http://activitycentral.com On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote: Already fixed, it seems? I can git pull. 2013/4/24 James Cameron qu...@laptop.org: I get the same. $ git pull fatal: unable to connect to git.sugarlabs.org: git.sugarlabs.org[0: 18.85.44.69]: errno=Connection refused $ git remote -v origin git://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar/mainline.git (fetch) origin git://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar/mainline.git (push) $ -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- .. manuq .. -- Regards, Ajay GargDextrose Developer Activity Central: http://activitycentral.com ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [GSoC] Mentor association
Any comments? On 4/12/13, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote: Oh btw I am JZA on #sugar if you want to chat about the project and need more interactivity. On 4/12/13, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote: Hi I want to contribute to sugar as a mentor, I could do some co-mentorship or something similar. My Google-Melange linkdID is jza Anyone needing a backup, can drop me an email, and give me some pointers to get on board with the project at hand. -- Alexandro Colorado Apache OpenOffice Contributor http://es.openoffice.org -- Alexandro Colorado Apache OpenOffice Contributor http://es.openoffice.org -- Alexandro Colorado Apache OpenOffice Contributor http://es.openoffice.org ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
