Re: [Sugar-devel] Google Summer of Code - Slots assigned

Count me in! Does the student get to decide who will mentor them when there is more than one mentor offering? Regards, Sebastian El 08/05/13 01:35, Aneesh Dogra escribió: Hello list, We have been assigned 8 slots for Google summer of code. We have received about 37 applications. Out of thes

[Sugar-devel] Google Summer of Code - Slots assigned

Hello list, We have been assigned 8 slots for Google summer of code. We have received about 37 applications. Out of these around 20 applications are weak and we don't really need to care about those. We have around 17 good enough applications and we need to cut down that to 8. I think the best th

Re: [Sugar-devel] Automated pyflakes checking

Daniel Narvaez Tuesday, May 07, 2013 8:39 AM Hello, we are now automatically checking sugar and sugar-toolkit-gtk3 using pyflakes. Please make sure your patches are pyflakes clean, so that we don't break the build. (Running "make check" before pushing is a good

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release TamTam Edit-67

Should work. Depending on your architecture, you may need compile a binary. http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Activities/Tam_Tam Gonzalo On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Jared Stroud wrote: > Does this work with the sugar emulator? > On May 3, 2013 4:53 PM, "Sugar Labs Activities" > wrote: > >> Ac

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity updater crash

On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > Hi Walter, > > the updater crash seems to be a bug in your code > > It looks like you should use get_data to get a python array from GBytes. > (unref_to_array shouldn't really be exposed in python) > Thanks. /me wonders why it ever worked.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity updater crash

On 7 May 2013 23:01, Walter Bender wrote: > > It's memory corruption, so it could have worked once if really lucky :) >> > > I guess I should have bought a lottery ticket, because it worked many many > times in my testing. > Hehe. It might be that the glib we are now building with sugar-build i

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity updater crash

On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > On 7 May 2013 22:59, Walter Bender wrote: > >> Hi Walter, >> >>> >>> the updater crash seems to be a bug in your code >>> >>> It looks like you should use get_data to get a python array from GBytes. >>> (unref_to_array shouldn't really be e

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity updater crash

On 7 May 2013 22:59, Walter Bender wrote: > Hi Walter, > >> >> the updater crash seems to be a bug in your code >> >> It looks like you should use get_data to get a python array from GBytes. >> (unref_to_array shouldn't really be exposed in python) >> > > Thanks. /me wonders why it ever worked. I

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release TamTam Edit-67

Does this work with the sugar emulator? On May 3, 2013 4:53 PM, "Sugar Labs Activities" wrote: > Activity Homepage: > http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4059 > > Sugar Platform: > 0.82 - 0.100 > > Download Now: > http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/28563/tamtamedit-67.xo > > Release

[Sugar-devel] Activity updater crash

Hi Walter, the updater crash seems to be a bug in your code It looks like you should use get_data to get a python array from GBytes. (unref_to_array shouldn't really be exposed in python) diff --git a/extensions/cpsection/updater/backends/aslo.py b/extensions/cpsectio index e244af0..7c41ae6 1006

Re: [Sugar-devel] Music Keyboard failed to start

On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Petr Huf wrote: > I have found in aclient.cpp function sc_initialize (causing this error) and > here is: > > PyArg_ParseTuples(args, "ssii", &str, &log_file, &VERBOSE, &framerate) > > and "ssi" means clearly 4 arguments and not 7 how compiler says. I see > problem w

Re: [Sugar-devel] Inspection and graphics in html activities

WebKit1 has a slightly different API, but it should not be too hard to add. On 7 May 2013 15:04, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > Good work boys! > > Is something we can use in Browse too? > > Gonzalo > > > On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Manuel Quiñones wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Daniel Narvaez and I have

Re: [Sugar-devel] Inspection and graphics in html activities

Good work boys! Is something we can use in Browse too? Gonzalo On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Manuel Quiñones wrote: > Hi, > > Daniel Narvaez and I have been working in html activities yesterday. He > added the very needed inspection console, and I added the graphics library > with a toolba

[Sugar-devel] Inspection and graphics in html activities

Hi, Daniel Narvaez and I have been working in html activities yesterday. He added the very needed inspection console, and I added the graphics library with a toolbar and buttons. Inspecting the activity, like can be seen in this image, is delightful: http://dev.laptop.org/~manuq/clock-inspected

[Sugar-devel] Automated pyflakes checking

Hello, we are now automatically checking sugar and sugar-toolkit-gtk3 using pyflakes. Please make sure your patches are pyflakes clean, so that we don't break the build. (Running "make check" before pushing is a good way to ensure it). I'm planning to do the same with pep8, help with making the c

Re: [Sugar-devel] Problems with `make run`

On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 6:48 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > Hey! > > On 7 May 2013 09:49, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn wrote: > >> Hello again: >> >> Well, now all was working! it works on Ubuntu 13.10 !! >> >> > Glad that it works! > > >> 1) Would be have a parameter for "make" that only compiles the "

Re: [Sugar-devel] discussion about dropping the emulator from the sugar package...

On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > On 7 May 2013 09:46, Simon Schampijer wrote: >> >> The reasoning for that change are all ok. >> >> I am wondering the following: who is using 'sugar-emulator' at the moment >> on Fedora (or possibly other distributions)? >> >> I think a dev

Re: [Sugar-devel] discussion about dropping the emulator from the sugar package...

On 7 May 2013 13:15, Simon Schampijer wrote: > On 05/07/2013 01:05 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > >> I think is important Fedora (and other distros) have a option to run sugar >> in a window in Gnome. >> If not, is more difficult develop activities. >> >> Gonzalo >> > > I think a developer is off we

Re: [Sugar-devel] discussion about dropping the emulator from the sugar package...

On 05/07/2013 01:05 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: I think is important Fedora (and other distros) have a option to run sugar in a window in Gnome. If not, is more difficult develop activities. Gonzalo I think a developer is off well in just use sugar-build for that purpose. At least as long as we

Re: [Sugar-devel] discussion about dropping the emulator from the sugar package...

I think is important Fedora (and other distros) have a option to run sugar in a window in Gnome. If not, is more difficult develop activities. Gonzalo On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote: > On 05/07/2013 12:44 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > >> On 7 May 2013 10:01, Peter Robinson

Re: [Sugar-devel] discussion about dropping the emulator from the sugar package...

On 05/07/2013 12:44 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: On 7 May 2013 10:01, Peter Robinson wrote: Advantages of having it together is that as the sugar release changes the changes are made to sugar the changes to sugar-runner are in lock step so you should never get into a situation where either shoul

Re: [Sugar-devel] Problems with `make run`

Hey! On 7 May 2013 09:49, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn wrote: > Hello again: > > Well, now all was working! it works on Ubuntu 13.10 !! > > Glad that it works! > 1) Would be have a parameter for "make" that only compiles the "core" > sugar? That > means the "strictly necessary". For example: I don

Re: [Sugar-devel] discussion about dropping the emulator from the sugar package...

On 7 May 2013 10:01, Peter Robinson wrote: > > Advantages of having it together is that as the sugar release changes > the changes are made to sugar the changes to sugar-runner are in lock > step so you should never get into a situation where either shouldn't > work together. It makes it easier f

Re: [Sugar-devel] discussion about dropping the emulator from the sugar package...

On 7 May 2013 09:46, Simon Schampijer wrote: > The reasoning for that change are all ok. > > I am wondering the following: who is using 'sugar-emulator' at the moment > on Fedora (or possibly other distributions)? > > I think a developer can use 'sugar-build' fine those days for his needs. > It i

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH TamTam 1/2 v2] Output to ALSA directly from csound

Yes, is included on version 7. The sound is different. You can compare with version 6, and volume high. I think the problem now is different, I don't know if is saturation or the samples quality. Gonzalo On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 5:59 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote: > On 05/03/2013 02:42 PM, Gonzalo O

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH TamTam 1/2 v2] Output to ALSA directly from csound

On 05/03/2013 02:42 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: Hi Daniel, Already released MusicKeyboard with this change, and waiting confirmation to release TamTam activities. Gonzalo Is that in version 7? I still hear cracking sounds when using the keyboard. Or maybe those are other cracking sounds then th

Re: [Sugar-devel] discussion about dropping the emulator from the sugar package...

On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > On 6 May 2013 11:47, Simon Schampijer wrote: >>> >>> "Yes sugar-runner should just work in fedora as a replacement of >>> sugar-emulator. It only needs to be packaged." >>> >>> Why isn't it included in the sugar package, what is the advanta

Re: [Sugar-devel] Problems with `make run`

Hello again: Well, now all was working! it works on Ubuntu 13.10 !! 1) Would be have a parameter for "make" that only compiles the "core" sugar? Thatmeans the "strictly necessary". For example: I don't want have the Terminal activity.. 2) I'm have problems with webkitgtk and then, I try compile a

Re: [Sugar-devel] discussion about dropping the emulator from the sugar package...

Thanks Daniel for the writeup. On 05/06/2013 12:35 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: On 6 May 2013 11:47, Simon Schampijer wrote: "Yes sugar-runner should just work in fedora as a replacement of sugar-emulator. It only needs to be packaged." Why isn't it included in the sugar package, what is the a