Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] Feature "Enhanced support for 3G modems"

[James Cameron]

On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 05:50:25AM +0200, Ruben Rodríguez wrote:
> 2013/7/3 James Cameron :
> >
> > "You will need to provide the following information to set up a mobile
> > broadband connection to a cellular (3G) network"
> >
> > It is ambiguous.  To whom should I provide this information?  My
> > teacher?  My broadband device seller?  My broadband service?  No, I
> > need not provide any information at all, I'm supposed to configure the
> > computer.
> 
> That text is already there in the modem configuration section of the
> CP, it was not added by the patch. The discussed feature just extends
> the current implementation by showing the database of mobile providers
> for each country.

Ah, thanks, that wasn't obvious from the picture, and the picture was
the only change included in the mail.  The patch wasn't attached, only
a link to a pull request.  I read offline.

Does the patch choose a default mobile provider?  There is one selected
in the picture.  I have now looked at the patch, and cannot find a default.

The text is very long, perhaps it should wrap as it does here:
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/images/thumb/6/63/3g_database_support_ui.png/700px-3g_database_support_ui.png
or is it not wrapped so as to avoid scroll bar?

> Modifying that text would require updating its translation to all
> languages.

Of course.  I do suggest that this text be updated, though not as part
of this feature.

-- 
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] Feature "Enhanced support for 3G modems"

[Ruben Rodríguez]

2013/7/3 James Cameron :
>
> "You will need to provide the following information to set up a mobile
> broadband connection to a cellular (3G) network"
>
> It is ambiguous.  To whom should I provide this information?  My
> teacher?  My broadband device seller?  My broadband service?  No, I
> need not provide any information at all, I'm supposed to configure the
> computer.

That text is already there in the modem configuration section of the
CP, it was not added by the patch. The discussed feature just extends
the current implementation by showing the database of mobile providers
for each country.

Modifying that text would require updating its translation to all languages.

Regards,
-- 
Rubén Rodríguez
CTO
Activity Central: http://activitycentral.com

Facebook: https://activitycentral.com/facebook
Google+: https://activitycentral.com/googleplus
Twitter: https://activitycentral.com/twitter
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RFC] Content support

[Manuel Quiñones]

2013/7/2 Gonzalo Odiard :
>
>> I like the idea.  This looks very related to web activities.  They
>> look similar because collections have their own icon, and with this
>> patch they will appear alongside activities.
>>
>
> Me too.
>
>>
>> What about runnig them in a webkit webview, without an url entry and
>> other browser specific controls?
>>
>
> I don't think so. Content bundles can have or not, links to allow
> navigation.

I see.  So I agree with you Gonzalo, let's not complicate it.  Daniel
patch is good enough.

--
.. manuq ..
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] Feature "Enhanced support for 3G modems"

[Peter Robinson]

On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 12:07 AM, James Cameron  wrote:
> Reviewing the GUI, I'm not sure I understand the intention of this
> opening statement:
>
> "You will need to provide the following information to set up a mobile
> broadband connection to a cellular (3G) network"
>
> It is ambiguous.  To whom should I provide this information?  My
> teacher?  My broadband device seller?  My broadband service?  No, I
> need not provide any information at all, I'm supposed to configure the
> computer.
>
> The opening predicts an action; "You will need to" can be removed and
> the sentence probably still has the same meanings.
>
> By mentioning mobile, you exclude the possibility of use with a fixed
> broadband device.  The devices need not move around to work.
>
> Also, by mentioning 3G, and showing a default 2G, there's an
> implication here that a 4G network cannot be used.  This isn't true; a
> 4G network should work fine with this GUI.

I agree mostly but in some cases you're splitting hairs. Ultimately
this should be an interface to ModemManager which already provides
things like carrier database information so in most cases you should
be able to input you Carrier and your plan and get a working WWAN
connection (2/3/4g) and it's also adding support for things like DSL
and other technologies rather than hard coding anything. I had sort of
hoped we'd learnt from the similarly related NetworkManager issues and
use underlying infra rather than reinventing the wheel which we
appeared to be doing the last time I browsed this feature.

Peter
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] Feature "Enhanced support for 3G modems"

[James Cameron]

Reviewing the GUI, I'm not sure I understand the intention of this
opening statement:

"You will need to provide the following information to set up a mobile
broadband connection to a cellular (3G) network"

It is ambiguous.  To whom should I provide this information?  My
teacher?  My broadband device seller?  My broadband service?  No, I
need not provide any information at all, I'm supposed to configure the
computer.

The opening predicts an action; "You will need to" can be removed and
the sentence probably still has the same meanings.

By mentioning mobile, you exclude the possibility of use with a fixed
broadband device.  The devices need not move around to work.

Also, by mentioning 3G, and showing a default 2G, there's an
implication here that a 4G network cannot be used.  This isn't true; a
4G network should work fine with this GUI.

-- 
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] somebody deleted gst-plugins-espeak from github?

[Daniel Narvaez]

On 2 July 2013 22:47, NoiseEHC  wrote:

>  Hi!
>

I'm not sure to understand what you are trying to do exactly. Just a couple
of things.

build worked as it pulled all repos. I thought that it is a connection
> problem because some days ago there was a connection problem. I just wanted
> to archive sugar-build just after pulling all the stuff as I really did not
> want to download ~450 megs again and again as I try different configure
> options for webkitgtk (as cleaning the tree does not work...).
>

On latest sugar-build clean is supposed to work pretty well. It should get
you back to a completely clean state. If you find issues please report them.


>
> Now it fails on fedora18 with this:
> * Building gobject-introspection
> ...
> checking for GLIB... no
> configure: error: Package requirements (glib-2.0 >= 2.36.0) were not met:
>
> Requested 'glib-2.0 >= 2.36.0' but version of GLib is 2.34.2
>

Duh! That's a recent regression. I fixed it now, thanks for reporting it.
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Yet another project to port Sugar to Android ?

[Christoph Derndorfer]

Hi Andrews,

thanks a lot for the explanations, much appreciated! :-)

Cheers,
Christoph


On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 12:18 AM, Andrew McMillan wrote:

> On Sun, 2013-06-30 at 16:28 +0200, lio...@olpc-france.org wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> >
> >
> > In a recent blog post on the OLPC association web site [1], I read
> > that there is a new (at least for me) project to port Sugar to
> > Android.
> >
> > Specifically, the post mentioned that the work is done by Morphoss
> > [2], a New Zealand company and that it allow to use Sugar on the XO
> > tablet.
>
> As is so often the case, the people who make the announcements do so
> without any pre-release testing on technical people :-)
>
> I've been responsible for the development of the XO Learning UI to date
> and it is our intention to include a "Sugar" service of some kind with
> that as soon as practicable.
>
> We plan to follow the "Sugar on HTML" design as closely as we can, with
> Simon & Manuel continuing to be involved in the work.
>
>
> > I wonder if anyone on this list know this work and in which way it
> > could be linked with the current work on HTML5 Sugar Framework?
>
> I expect our development at OLPC to implement that framework.
>
>
> > Of course it’s clear for me that it’s better to work together on the
> > same project instead of working on two different projects to do the
> > same thing !
>
> Absolutely!
>
> Personally I still need to properly understand at what stage the
> specification is, and how much work will it take to get it over the
> line.  I understand there is already an implementation for GTK in
> progress, and I hope we can get an Android implementation done alongside
> that as soon as possible.
>
> I hope this helps clarify things for everyone.
>
> Regards,
> Andrew McMillan.
>
> --
> 
> andrew (AT) morphoss (DOT) com +64 (2) 7233 2426
>  Immigration is the sincerest form of flattery.
>   -- Jack Paar
>
> 
>
>
> ___
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>


-- 
Christoph Derndorfer

volunteer, OLPC (Austria) [www.olpc.at]
editor, OLPC News [www.olpcnews.com]
contributor, TechnikBasteln [www.technikbasteln.net]

e-mail: christ...@derndorfer.eu
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Yet another project to port Sugar to Android ?

[Andrew McMillan]

On Sun, 2013-06-30 at 16:28 +0200, lio...@olpc-france.org wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
>  
> 
> In a recent blog post on the OLPC association web site [1], I read
> that there is a new (at least for me) project to port Sugar to
> Android.
> 
> Specifically, the post mentioned that the work is done by Morphoss
> [2], a New Zealand company and that it allow to use Sugar on the XO
> tablet.

As is so often the case, the people who make the announcements do so
without any pre-release testing on technical people :-)

I've been responsible for the development of the XO Learning UI to date
and it is our intention to include a "Sugar" service of some kind with
that as soon as practicable.

We plan to follow the "Sugar on HTML" design as closely as we can, with
Simon & Manuel continuing to be involved in the work.


> I wonder if anyone on this list know this work and in which way it
> could be linked with the current work on HTML5 Sugar Framework?

I expect our development at OLPC to implement that framework.


> Of course it’s clear for me that it’s better to work together on the
> same project instead of working on two different projects to do the
> same thing !

Absolutely!

Personally I still need to properly understand at what stage the
specification is, and how much work will it take to get it over the
line.  I understand there is already an implementation for GTK in
progress, and I hope we can get an Android implementation done alongside
that as soon as possible.

I hope this helps clarify things for everyone.

Regards,
Andrew McMillan.

-- 

andrew (AT) morphoss (DOT) com +64 (2) 7233 2426
 Immigration is the sincerest form of flattery.
  -- Jack Paar





signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

[Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] Feature "Enhanced support for 3G modems"

[Miguel González]

Hello,

I've just send a pull request with the implementation of 3G database
support in control panel modem configuration section.

https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/pull/46

In this email, I'm attaching  a screenshot to review UI design.

About the implementation, some highlights:

- There is a new config.py file with constants: file paths and GConf keys.

- It uses GConf keys to persistently store country, provider and plan
selections

- In model.py a class controller retrieve data form XML and store
selections on GConf

- In the view.py, adds a new ScrolledWindow with an upper box for 3 combo
provider selection, a separator and a lower box with the previous entries
for network settings.

- When a plan is selected, network settings are changed using the same
methods.


I have some concerns:

- Is the GUI correct?

- File paths should be move to a template config.py.in file?

- I have kind of unitary tests for ServiceProviderDatabase class but I
don't know exactly where to put them. They use mock library to simulate
GConf calls.

- Is it necessary to write functional test for view? Is there information
about how to do it?


Thank you for your attention.
-- 
Miguel González
Activity Central: http://www.activitycentral.com
<>___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] somebody deleted gst-plugins-espeak from github?

[NoiseEHC]

Hi!

build worked as it pulled all repos. I thought that it is a connection 
problem because some days ago there was a connection problem. I just 
wanted to archive sugar-build just after pulling all the stuff as I 
really did not want to download ~450 megs again and again as I try 
different configure options for webkitgtk (as cleaning the tree does not 
work...).



Now it fails on fedora18 with this:
* Building gobject-introspection
...
checking for GLIB... no
configure: error: Package requirements (glib-2.0 >= 2.36.0) were not met:

Requested 'glib-2.0 >= 2.36.0' but version of GLib is 2.34.2

Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
installed software in a non-standard prefix.

Alternatively, you may set the environment variables GLIB_CFLAGS
and GLIB_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config.
See the pkg-config man page for more details.


So now I gave up building webkitgtk from sugar and will download 
directly from the source and will compile my little activity without sugar.


Thanks anyways,
Andrew


On 02/07/2013 21:12, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Something else you can try is "git pull". Basically your config is 
stuck to an old version, I'm not sure exactly why. I made improvements 
in that area lately but you won't get them until this is unstuck :)


On Tuesday, 2 July 2013, Daniel Narvaez wrote:

Try to run just "./osbuild" first then pull again?

On Tuesday, 2 July 2013, Noise EHC wrote:

Hi!

For several days I get this, and looking at
https://github.com/sugarlabs/ I cannot see the repository
either...


Log:

[ehc@localhost sugar-build]$ ./osbuild pull

= Pulling =

* Pulling automake
* Pulling glib
* Pulling gobject-introspection
* Pulling pygobject
* Pulling dbus-python
* Pulling gwebsockets
* Pulling node
* Pulling grunt-cli
* Pulling volo
* Pulling karma
* Pulling jshint
* Pulling js-beautify
* Pulling docker
* Pulling flake8
* Pulling sugar-docs
* Pulling sugar-toolkit-gtk3
* Pulling sugar
* Pulling sugar-artwork
* Pulling sugar-datastore
* Pulling gst-plugins-espeak

Command failed: git clone --progress
git://github.com/sugarlabs/gst-plugins-espeak.git

gst-plugins-espeak

fatal: remote error:
  Repository not found.
Cloning into 'gst-plugins-espeak'...
Retrying (attempt 1) in 1 minute


Thanks,
Andrew



-- 
Daniel Narvaez




--
Daniel Narvaez



___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Phasing out Fedora 18 support

[Daniel Narvaez]

On 2 July 2013 21:01, Peter Robinson  wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Daniel Narvaez 
> wrote:
> > It's not a change. Since I announced it, the policy with sugar-build has
> > been to support only the latest version of a distro.
> >
> > If you want to change that you will have to figure out how to resource
> it,
> > I'm personally not interested in maintaining support for multiple distro
> > version if not for a short time to allow people to upgrade... It's
> already
> > complicated enough as it is.
>
> You realise it's not all about you and the world doesn't revolved
> around just you. The current stable releases for both SoaS and OLPC
> are both based on Fedora 18 and while F-19 is out today it does take
> time for people to migrate. The current devel release for OLPC is on
> Fedora 18 as well. I can understand phasing out Fedora 17 as it's EOL
> in a month but while it might be easy for you to click you fingers and
> move on a lot of activity developers take quite some time and will
> remain on Fedora 18 for some time because that's what the current OLPC
> stable release is based upon.
>

I'm not sure activity developers generally need to use sugar-build. Unless
they want to hack on sugar itself or to use some new API (web activities
for example) packages should work just fine. My main goal with sugar-build
is to make it easy to participate to the development of the Sugar core.


> I'm not sure what the problem with is with F-18 the current stable
> release of sugar supports it just fine.
>

Master is pretty different from stable and we need to already build several
external packages on F18 to keep things working.

Anyway all that I'm saying is that maintaining sugar-build support for
three distribution is already using too much of my time. That's pretty much
the best I can do. If we want to increase that number, we need other people
to jump in.
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] somebody deleted gst-plugins-espeak from github?

[Daniel Narvaez]

Something else you can try is "git pull". Basically your config is stuck to
an old version, I'm not sure exactly why. I made improvements in that area
lately but you won't get them until this is unstuck :)

On Tuesday, 2 July 2013, Daniel Narvaez wrote:

> Try to run just "./osbuild" first then pull again?
>
> On Tuesday, 2 July 2013, Noise EHC wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> For several days I get this, and looking at https://github.com/sugarlabs/ I
>> cannot see the repository either...
>>
>>
>> Log:
>>
>> [ehc@localhost sugar-build]$ ./osbuild pull
>>
>> = Pulling =
>>
>> * Pulling automake
>> * Pulling glib
>> * Pulling gobject-introspection
>> * Pulling pygobject
>> * Pulling dbus-python
>> * Pulling gwebsockets
>> * Pulling node
>> * Pulling grunt-cli
>> * Pulling volo
>> * Pulling karma
>> * Pulling jshint
>> * Pulling js-beautify
>> * Pulling docker
>> * Pulling flake8
>> * Pulling sugar-docs
>> * Pulling sugar-toolkit-gtk3
>> * Pulling sugar
>> * Pulling sugar-artwork
>> * Pulling sugar-datastore
>> * Pulling gst-plugins-espeak
>>
>> Command failed: git clone --progress git://
>> github.com/sugarlabs/gst-plugins-espeak.git gst-plugins-espeak
>>
>> fatal: remote error:
>>   Repository not found.
>> Cloning into 'gst-plugins-espeak'...
>> Retrying (attempt 1) in 1 minute
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Andrew
>>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Narvaez
>
>

-- 
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Phasing out Fedora 18 support

[Peter Robinson]

On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Daniel Narvaez  wrote:
> It's not a change. Since I announced it, the policy with sugar-build has
> been to support only the latest version of a distro.
>
> If you want to change that you will have to figure out how to resource it,
> I'm personally not interested in maintaining support for multiple distro
> version if not for a short time to allow people to upgrade... It's already
> complicated enough as it is.

You realise it's not all about you and the world doesn't revolved
around just you. The current stable releases for both SoaS and OLPC
are both based on Fedora 18 and while F-19 is out today it does take
time for people to migrate. The current devel release for OLPC is on
Fedora 18 as well. I can understand phasing out Fedora 17 as it's EOL
in a month but while it might be easy for you to click you fingers and
move on a lot of activity developers take quite some time and will
remain on Fedora 18 for some time because that's what the current OLPC
stable release is based upon.

I'm not sure what the problem with is with F-18 the current stable
release of sugar supports it just fine.

Peter

> On Tuesday, 2 July 2013, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>>
>> Hi Daniel,
>> Like with the remove of gtk2 toolkit,
>> this change will do our life a bit more difficult.
>> Should be good wait at least a few months,
>> and discuss this decisions with the community.
>>
>> Gonzalo
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Daniel Narvaez 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> we have been supporting Fedora 19 for a while but it was only really
>>> released today.
>>>
>>> That's only version we are now listing in the documentation and I turned
>>> off the Fedora 18 buildbot. I plan to keep Fedora 18 working for a couple of
>>> weeks or so, to give people the time to upgrade.
>>>
>>> If you are tired of building webkit go ahead and upgrade now :)
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Daniel Narvaez
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>>> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Narvaez
>
>
> ___
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Phasing out Fedora 18 support

[Daniel Narvaez]

It's not a change. Since I announced it, the policy with sugar-build has
been to support only the latest version of a distro.

If you want to change that you will have to figure out how to resource it,
I'm personally not interested in maintaining support for multiple distro
version if not for a short time to allow people to upgrade... It's already
complicated enough as it is.

On Tuesday, 2 July 2013, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:

> Hi Daniel,
> Like with the remove of gtk2 toolkit,
> this change will do our life a bit more difficult.
> Should be good wait at least a few months,
> and discuss this decisions with the community.
>
> Gonzalo
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Daniel Narvaez 
> 
> > wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> we have been supporting Fedora 19 for a while but it was only really
>> released today.
>>
>> That's only version we are now listing in the documentation and I turned
>> off the Fedora 18 buildbot. I plan to keep Fedora 18 working for a
>> couple of weeks or so, to give people the time to upgrade.
>>
>> If you are tired of building webkit go ahead and upgrade now :)
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Narvaez
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > 'Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org');>
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>
>>
>

-- 
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] somebody deleted gst-plugins-espeak from github?

[Daniel Narvaez]

Try to run just "./osbuild" first then pull again?

On Tuesday, 2 July 2013, Noise EHC wrote:

> Hi!
>
> For several days I get this, and looking at https://github.com/sugarlabs/ I
> cannot see the repository either...
>
>
> Log:
>
> [ehc@localhost sugar-build]$ ./osbuild pull
>
> = Pulling =
>
> * Pulling automake
> * Pulling glib
> * Pulling gobject-introspection
> * Pulling pygobject
> * Pulling dbus-python
> * Pulling gwebsockets
> * Pulling node
> * Pulling grunt-cli
> * Pulling volo
> * Pulling karma
> * Pulling jshint
> * Pulling js-beautify
> * Pulling docker
> * Pulling flake8
> * Pulling sugar-docs
> * Pulling sugar-toolkit-gtk3
> * Pulling sugar
> * Pulling sugar-artwork
> * Pulling sugar-datastore
> * Pulling gst-plugins-espeak
>
> Command failed: git clone --progress git://
> github.com/sugarlabs/gst-plugins-espeak.git gst-plugins-espeak
>
> fatal: remote error:
>   Repository not found.
> Cloning into 'gst-plugins-espeak'...
> Retrying (attempt 1) in 1 minute
>
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew
>


-- 
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

[Sugar-devel] somebody deleted gst-plugins-espeak from github?

[Noise EHC]

Hi!

For several days I get this, and looking at https://github.com/sugarlabs/ I
cannot see the repository either...


Log:

[ehc@localhost sugar-build]$ ./osbuild pull

= Pulling =

* Pulling automake
* Pulling glib
* Pulling gobject-introspection
* Pulling pygobject
* Pulling dbus-python
* Pulling gwebsockets
* Pulling node
* Pulling grunt-cli
* Pulling volo
* Pulling karma
* Pulling jshint
* Pulling js-beautify
* Pulling docker
* Pulling flake8
* Pulling sugar-docs
* Pulling sugar-toolkit-gtk3
* Pulling sugar
* Pulling sugar-artwork
* Pulling sugar-datastore
* Pulling gst-plugins-espeak

Command failed: git clone --progress git://
github.com/sugarlabs/gst-plugins-espeak.git gst-plugins-espeak

fatal: remote error:
  Repository not found.
Cloning into 'gst-plugins-espeak'...
Retrying (attempt 1) in 1 minute


Thanks,
Andrew
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Phasing out Fedora 18 support

[Gonzalo Odiard]

Hi Daniel,
Like with the remove of gtk2 toolkit,
this change will do our life a bit more difficult.
Should be good wait at least a few months,
and discuss this decisions with the community.

Gonzalo


On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Daniel Narvaez  wrote:

> Hello,
>
> we have been supporting Fedora 19 for a while but it was only really
> released today.
>
> That's only version we are now listing in the documentation and I turned
> off the Fedora 18 buildbot. I plan to keep Fedora 18 working for a couple
> of weeks or so, to give people the time to upgrade.
>
> If you are tired of building webkit go ahead and upgrade now :)
>
>
> --
> Daniel Narvaez
>
>
> ___
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

[Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Phasing out Fedora 18 support

[Daniel Narvaez]

Hello,

we have been supporting Fedora 19 for a while but it was only really
released today.

That's only version we are now listing in the documentation and I turned
off the Fedora 18 buildbot. I plan to keep Fedora 18 working for a couple
of weeks or so, to give people the time to upgrade.

If you are tired of building webkit go ahead and upgrade now :)


-- 
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

[Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release CookieSearch-9

[Sugar Labs Activities]

Activity Homepage:
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4578

Sugar Platform:
0.96 - 0.100

Download Now:
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/28670/cookiesearch-9.xo

Release notes:
9

* New translations
* Support for screen rotation
* Better? scaling on some wide displays


Sugar Labs Activities
http://activities.sugarlabs.org

___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release Memorize-44

[Gonzalo Odiard]

Ok. Moved directory, just in time to version 45

Gonzalo


On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Gonzalo Odiard  wrote:
> > You are right.
> > Peter, is a problem for you if I move the Memorize directory to honey?
>
> Not at all, either is fine, I just update the URL in the spec file.
>
> Peter
>
> > Gonzalo
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Chris Leonard <
> cjlhomeaddr...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Technically Memorize is a Honey activity, not a Fructose activity.  At
> >> least according to Pootle.
> >>
> >> cjl
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 5:46 AM, Gonzalo Odiard 
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hmm, probably a sequence of mistakes from myself :)
> >>>
> >>> I moved all to
> >>> http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Memorize/
> >>>
> >>> Gonzalo
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 6:28 AM, Peter Robinson 
> >>> wrote:
> 
>  Thanks,
> 
>  Just a heads up we seem to have the releases split across two
> locations
> 
>  http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Memorize/
>  http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/honey/Memorize/
> 
>  Peter
> 
>  On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 1:45 AM, Gonzalo Odiard 
>  wrote:
>  > Done
>  >
>  > Gonzalo
>  >
>  >
>  > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Peter Robinson <
> pbrobin...@gmail.com>
>  > wrote:
>  >>
>  >> Can we have a tar ball please
>  >>
>  >> On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 12:01 AM, Sugar Labs Activities
>  >>  wrote:
>  >> > Activity Homepage:
>  >> > http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4063
>  >> >
>  >> > Sugar Platform:
>  >> > 0.96 - 0.100
>  >> >
>  >> > Download Now:
>  >> >
> http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/28653/memorize-44.xo
>  >> >
>  >> > Release notes:
>  >> > When add a pair of cards go to the end of the list
>  >> > Replace the combo used to change the font by a button with a
>  >> > palette
>  >> > Use a VTray in the list of card to allow the use with touch
>  >> > Reorganize edition panel if the screen is rotated
>  >> > Rearrange widgets in the play screen to use rotated (Walter
> Bender)
>  >> >
>  >> >
>  >> >
>  >> > Sugar Labs Activities
>  >> > http://activities.sugarlabs.org
>  >> >
>  >> > ___
>  >> > Sugar-devel mailing list
>  >> > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
>  >> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>  >> ___
>  >> Sugar-devel mailing list
>  >> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
>  >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>  >
>  >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ___
> >>> Sugar-devel mailing list
> >>> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> >>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

[Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release Memorize-45

[Sugar Labs Activities]

Activity Homepage:
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4063

Sugar Platform:
0.86 - 0.100

Download Now:
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/28669/memorize-45.xo

Release notes:
Fix broken startup if font configurations is missing - SL #4536


Sugar Labs Activities
http://activities.sugarlabs.org

___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release Memorize-44

[Peter Robinson]

On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Gonzalo Odiard  wrote:
> You are right.
> Peter, is a problem for you if I move the Memorize directory to honey?

Not at all, either is fine, I just update the URL in the spec file.

Peter

> Gonzalo
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Chris Leonard 
> wrote:
>>
>> Technically Memorize is a Honey activity, not a Fructose activity.  At
>> least according to Pootle.
>>
>> cjl
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 5:46 AM, Gonzalo Odiard 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hmm, probably a sequence of mistakes from myself :)
>>>
>>> I moved all to
>>> http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Memorize/
>>>
>>> Gonzalo
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 6:28 AM, Peter Robinson 
>>> wrote:

 Thanks,

 Just a heads up we seem to have the releases split across two locations

 http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Memorize/
 http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/honey/Memorize/

 Peter

 On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 1:45 AM, Gonzalo Odiard 
 wrote:
 > Done
 >
 > Gonzalo
 >
 >
 > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Peter Robinson 
 > wrote:
 >>
 >> Can we have a tar ball please
 >>
 >> On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 12:01 AM, Sugar Labs Activities
 >>  wrote:
 >> > Activity Homepage:
 >> > http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4063
 >> >
 >> > Sugar Platform:
 >> > 0.96 - 0.100
 >> >
 >> > Download Now:
 >> > http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/28653/memorize-44.xo
 >> >
 >> > Release notes:
 >> > When add a pair of cards go to the end of the list
 >> > Replace the combo used to change the font by a button with a
 >> > palette
 >> > Use a VTray in the list of card to allow the use with touch
 >> > Reorganize edition panel if the screen is rotated
 >> > Rearrange widgets in the play screen to use rotated (Walter Bender)
 >> >
 >> >
 >> >
 >> > Sugar Labs Activities
 >> > http://activities.sugarlabs.org
 >> >
 >> > ___
 >> > Sugar-devel mailing list
 >> > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
 >> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
 >> ___
 >> Sugar-devel mailing list
 >> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
 >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
 >
 >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>>> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>>
>>
>
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release Memorize-44

[Gonzalo Odiard]

You are right.
Peter, is a problem for you if I move the Memorize directory to honey?

Gonzalo


On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Chris Leonard wrote:

> Technically Memorize is a Honey activity, not a Fructose activity.  At
> least according to Pootle.
>
> cjl
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 5:46 AM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>
>> Hmm, probably a sequence of mistakes from myself :)
>>
>> I moved all to
>> http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Memorize/
>>
>> Gonzalo
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 6:28 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Just a heads up we seem to have the releases split across two locations
>>>
>>> http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Memorize/
>>> http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/honey/Memorize/
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 1:45 AM, Gonzalo Odiard 
>>> wrote:
>>> > Done
>>> >
>>> > Gonzalo
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Peter Robinson 
>>> > wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Can we have a tar ball please
>>> >>
>>> >> On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 12:01 AM, Sugar Labs Activities
>>> >>  wrote:
>>> >> > Activity Homepage:
>>> >> > http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4063
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Sugar Platform:
>>> >> > 0.96 - 0.100
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Download Now:
>>> >> > http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/28653/memorize-44.xo
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Release notes:
>>> >> > When add a pair of cards go to the end of the list
>>> >> > Replace the combo used to change the font by a button with a palette
>>> >> > Use a VTray in the list of card to allow the use with touch
>>> >> > Reorganize edition panel if the screen is rotated
>>> >> > Rearrange widgets in the play screen to use rotated (Walter Bender)
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Sugar Labs Activities
>>> >> > http://activities.sugarlabs.org
>>> >> >
>>> >> > ___
>>> >> > Sugar-devel mailing list
>>> >> > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
>>> >> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>> >> ___
>>> >> Sugar-devel mailing list
>>> >> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
>>> >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>
>>
>
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RFC] Content support

[Gonzalo Odiard]

> I like the idea.  This looks very related to web activities.  They
> look similar because collections have their own icon, and with this
> patch they will appear alongside activities.
>
>
Me too.


> What about runnig them in a webkit webview, without an url entry and
> other browser specific controls?
>
>
I don't think so. Content bundles can have or not, links to allow
navigation.
May be should be good, configure the browser to use the main page as home
page,
when open a content bundle.

Dsd, +1 from my part, as you said, is a useful resource for deployments.

Gonzalo



> --
> .. manuq ..
> ___
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Theorie patchs

[Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn]

It's a musical activity.The maintainer: Aneesh Dogra takes it in Google Code:
http://www.google-melange.com/gci/task/view/google/gci2012/7994220
The repo:https://git.sugarlabs.org/theorie-internationalization

Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 08:56:22 -0300
Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] Theorie patchs
From: gonz...@laptop.org
To: alan...@hotmail.com
CC: lionane...@gmail.com; sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org; 
a...@lists.sugarlabs.org

Hi Alan,What activity is that?Do you know who is the maintainer?
Gonzalo

On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn  
wrote:




Hi,
Some time ago I make this changes for Theorie activity.Would be good apply both.
Regards!

Alan  

___

Sugar-devel mailing list

Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org

http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel



  ___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Theorie patchs

[Gonzalo Odiard]

Hi Alan,
What activity is that?
Do you know who is the maintainer?

Gonzalo


On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn <
alan...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Some time ago I make this changes for Theorie activity.
> Would be good apply both.
>
> Regards!
>
> Alan
>
> ___
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel