Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Arch Linux XO image and Sugar packages

2013-10-08 Thread James Cameron
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 09:32:34PM -0500, Sebastian Silva wrote: > dir u:\ > > clears the screen and shows some garbled text. > On my laptop the usb drive mounts fine. > Strange, no ? Looking into it further, it may relate to how Daniel advises you to effectively destroy the device partition tab

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Arch Linux XO image and Sugar packages

2013-10-08 Thread James Cameron
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 09:57:41PM -0500, Sebastian Silva wrote: > El 08/10/13 21:32, Sebastian Silva escribió: > > > >As I was finishing my report... I just thought maybe I have old > >firmware... will report shortly. > Indeed, that did the trick. I'm on archxo :-) Good. I was going to locate th

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Arch Linux XO image and Sugar packages

2013-10-08 Thread Sebastian Silva
El 08/10/13 21:57, Sebastian Silva escribió: El 08/10/13 21:32, Sebastian Silva escribió: As I was finishing my report... I just thought maybe I have old firmware... will report shortly. Indeed, that did the trick. I'm on archxo :-) Now how do I setup a wifi link? Tried iwconfig but it's not

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Arch Linux XO image and Sugar packages

2013-10-08 Thread Sebastian Silva
El 08/10/13 21:32, Sebastian Silva escribió: As I was finishing my report... I just thought maybe I have old firmware... will report shortly. Indeed, that did the trick. I'm on archxo :-) Now how do I setup a wifi link? Tried iwconfig but it's not found. Looking forward to try the new packag

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Arch Linux XO image and Sugar packages

2013-10-08 Thread Sebastian Silva
El 06/10/13 16:16, Daniel Narvaez escribió: And instructions to install it https://github.com/dnarvaez/archxo I found time to try this and the procedure didn't work for me on XO1.75. I repeated the process twice. I went into openfirmware and tried: ok boot u:\boot\olpc.fth But got "Can't o

Re: [Sugar-devel] Translating etoys home screen

2013-10-08 Thread Daniel Drake
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Chris Leonard wrote: > Just a quick question Daniel, > > The Armenian translations are relatively new and may not have been > committed. Are you working directly from the PO files in Pootle or > the EToys repo? The PO files I can manage myself. The translations I'

Re: [Sugar-devel] Translating etoys home screen

2013-10-08 Thread Chris Leonard
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Daniel Drake wrote: > Hi Bert, > > Could you advise on how we could translate the etoys home screen to Armenian? > > I see: > > http://forum.world.st/How-to-translate-strings-in-Home-pr-td3527757.html > > However the crucial "how to translate" link there is broken.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Central's Sugar related priorities.

2013-10-08 Thread David Farning
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Samuel Greenfeld wrote: > This actually is kind of what I meant (and perhaps should be a separate > thread). > > My understanding is that deployments nowadays are the primary parties > funding Sugar development. And the deployments or their contractors > sometimes

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.99.4 (unstable)

2013-10-08 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 8 October 2013 23:16, Peter Robinson wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > >> I just noticed it missing from the rpm, in the old sugar it was used > >> at least as the icon for the desktop icon for sugar-emulator so there > >> should likely be a similar click and run means of running sugar-runner > >> as we

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.99.4 (unstable)

2013-10-08 Thread Peter Robinson
Hi Daniel, >> I just noticed it missing from the rpm, in the old sugar it was used >> at least as the icon for the desktop icon for sugar-emulator so there >> should likely be a similar click and run means of running sugar-runner >> as well for newbies as a lot of people seem to run it that way fr

[Sugar-devel] Translating etoys home screen

2013-10-08 Thread Daniel Drake
Hi Bert, Could you advise on how we could translate the etoys home screen to Armenian? I see: http://forum.world.st/How-to-translate-strings-in-Home-pr-td3527757.html However the crucial "how to translate" link there is broken. The first step in this translation would be to generate a list of

[Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release Turtle Blocks-191

2013-10-08 Thread Sugar Labs Activities
Activity Homepage: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4027 Sugar Platform: 0.82 - 0.100 Download Now: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/28780/turtleblocks-191.xo Release notes: 191 ENHANCEMENTS: * New sample programs (Kyoto flowers) * New translations * Add support for querying

Re: [Sugar-devel] Next release

2013-10-08 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Hello, we had a discussion in irc, of which Walter posted the log. The current proposal on the table is On 31/10 * Release 0.100 * Create a branch * Discuss the 0.102 features * Schedule another 6 months cycle Other outcomes * Australia would be using 0.101 in some schools. I think that would

[Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release FractionBounce-21

2013-10-08 Thread Sugar Labs Activities
Activity Homepage: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4488 Sugar Platform: 0.96 - 0.100 Download Now: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/28779/fractionbounce-21.xo Release notes: v21 BUG FIX: * Fixed problem with keyboard input Sugar Labs Activities http://activities.sugarlabs.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Next release

2013-10-08 Thread Walter Bender
[11:23] dnarvaez_: I think we need an irc discussion of the release schedule [11:23] email is too slow for a discussion [11:24] walterbender, +1, i just was thinking the same [11:24] I'm happy to have an irc discussion when I'm around [11:24] lets see if gonzalo_odiard is here? [11:24] dnarva

Re: [Sugar-devel] Next release

2013-10-08 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Walter Bender wrote: > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: >> On 8 October 2013 15:18, Peter Robinson wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Daniel Narvaez >>> wrote: >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > I think we should certainly *not* branch until

Re: [Sugar-devel] Next release

2013-10-08 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 8 October 2013 17:19, Walter Bender wrote: > We (Gonzalo and I) have some new features we'd like to land in 102. > How to proceed? Can we schedule an IRC discussion? Maybe just start a "0.102 features" email thread? The details of what you would like to land and a rough timeframe would be he

Re: [Sugar-devel] Next release

2013-10-08 Thread Walter Bender
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > On 8 October 2013 15:18, Peter Robinson wrote: >> >> On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Daniel Narvaez >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I think we should certainly *not* branch until January/Australia >> > release. If >> > anyone disagrees now i

Re: [Sugar-devel] Next release

2013-10-08 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 8 October 2013 15:14, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > Continuos development do not work well with downstream/upstream projects. > Well, I think that statement would need to be justified. > > We need go back to release cycles aligned with Fedora/Gnome if possible. > See, I'm not sure that's even p

Re: [Sugar-devel] Next release

2013-10-08 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 8 October 2013 15:18, Peter Robinson wrote: > It depends if it's proper "continuous development" where it's all > small and incremental improvements with the platform being constantly > usable and features and it also depends on the end users of the > product. I agree and I don't think we ar

Re: [Sugar-devel] Next release

2013-10-08 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 8 October 2013 15:18, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Daniel Narvaez > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I think we should certainly *not* branch until January/Australia > release. If > > anyone disagrees now it's the time to speak up. > > I think not forking should be fine as l

Re: [Sugar-devel] Next release

2013-10-08 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > Hi, > > I think we should certainly *not* branch until January/Australia release. If > anyone disagrees now it's the time to speak up. I think not forking should be fine as long as people are happy to hold off from landing any new big featu

Re: [Sugar-devel] Next release

2013-10-08 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 8:17 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > Hi, > > I think we should certainly *not* branch until January/Australia release. > If anyone disagrees now it's the time to speak up. > > Really, looking forward I think we should switch to continuous development > and never branch again. B

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release Image Viewer-59

2013-10-08 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/ImageViewer/ImageViewer-59.tar.bz2 On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > Can I have a tar file for this release please? > > Peter > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 1:39 AM, Sugar Labs Activities > wrote: > > Activity Homepage:

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.99.4 (unstable)

2013-10-08 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > On 8 October 2013 12:13, Peter Robinson wrote: >> >> >> > Hello, >> >> > >> >> > here is 0.99.4, thanks to everyone that contributed! >> >> > >> >> > Highlights: >> >> > >> >> > * Enable use of a proxy in the activities updater. >> >> >> >>

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.99.4 (unstable)

2013-10-08 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 8 October 2013 12:13, Peter Robinson wrote: > >> > Hello, > >> > > >> > here is 0.99.4, thanks to everyone that contributed! > >> > > >> > Highlights: > >> > > >> > * Enable use of a proxy in the activities updater. > >> > >> > * Make journal updates more reliable > >> > * Artwork now licensed

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.99.4 (unstable)

2013-10-08 Thread Peter Robinson
>> > Hello, >> > >> > here is 0.99.4, thanks to everyone that contributed! >> > >> > Highlights: >> > >> > * Enable use of a proxy in the activities updater. >> >> > * Make journal updates more reliable >> > * Artwork now licensed also under Apache 2.0. >> > * Theme improvements. >> >> This is now

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.99.4 (unstable)

2013-10-08 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 8 October 2013 09:11, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Daniel Narvaez > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > here is 0.99.4, thanks to everyone that contributed! > > > > Highlights: > > > > * Enable use of a proxy in the activities updater. > > * Make journal updates more reliabl

Re: [Sugar-devel] How everyone can help with 0.100

2013-10-08 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > Weird. There is no tarball but the release has been tagged in git. > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libxklavier/tag/?id=libxklavier-5.4 > > I wonder if they just forgot to upload the tarball... I've poked to see what the deal is, once we have

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Central's Sugar related priorities.

2013-10-08 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 8 October 2013 01:45, Ruben Rodríguez wrote: > Also, there are some bits of code in both Sugar and the activities > that assume to be running on Fedora, or even on an XO, and those need > cleaning. Please fix those bits directly upstream! I have not seen any patch related to this effort yet.

Re: [Sugar-devel] How everyone can help with 0.100

2013-10-08 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Weird. There is no tarball but the release has been tagged in git. http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libxklavier/tag/?id=libxklavier-5.4 I wonder if they just forgot to upload the tarball... On Tuesday, 8 October 2013, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 1:17 AM, Daniel Narvaez > > > wro

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.99.4 (unstable)

2013-10-08 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > Hello, > > here is 0.99.4, thanks to everyone that contributed! > > Highlights: > > * Enable use of a proxy in the activities updater. > * Make journal updates more reliable > * Artwork now licensed also under Apache 2.0. > * Theme improveme