[Sugar-devel] KQED: In Oakland, Mixed Results for Tech In Schools

2013-11-01 Thread Hal Murray
There is no mention of OLPC or Sugar, but I think it's good background info as well as a good news story. http://www.californiareport.org/archive/R201311011630/b The audio is 6 minutes. For those of you not familiar with Oakland, they have lots of troubles, close to Detroit, and the schools ha

[Sugar-devel] Agustín Zubiaga en Expo Aprende 2013

2013-11-01 Thread Flavio Danesse
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fsnmu8XtWuQ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Private vs Public conversations.

2013-11-01 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
Flavio, Would be good have concrete proposals about what you think can be improved, to be discussed point by point. About a easier implementation of collaboration, we discussed a proposal, and I think Agustin started a implementation. Gonzalo On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Flavio Danesse wrote:

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release MathGraph32-16

2013-11-01 Thread Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn
> To: sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 20:10:18 -0400 > From: activit...@sugarlabs.org > Subject: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release MathGraph32-16 > > Activity Homepage: > http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4303 > > Sugar Platform: > 0.86 - 0.100 > > Download Now: > http://a

[Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release MathGraph32-16

2013-11-01 Thread Sugar Labs Activities
Activity Homepage: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4303 Sugar Platform: 0.86 - 0.100 Download Now: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/28815/mathgraph32-16.xo Release notes: Sugar Labs Activities http://activities.sugarlabs.org ___

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-web - How to load non-AMD js modules / libs?

2013-11-01 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Yeah I think it make sense to mention it in the documentation, it's something every developer will run into. I'd suggest to try and keep our own documentation as short as possible and link out to the requirejs shim doc though, to avoid duplication and help maintenance. On Saturday, 2 November 2013

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-web - How to load non-AMD js modules / libs?

2013-11-01 Thread Code
Thanks, Daniel! I'd rather use "shim", too. I think it's a common need to have non-AMD dependencies when building an activity. What do you think about finding out a canonical way to achieve this and write it down in "write your own activity" doc? I'm willing to make a pull-request with the update

Re: [Sugar-devel] DBusException: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.LimitsExceeded in sugar-build

2013-11-01 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Both can be used. The glib implementation is not as complete as python-dbus if I remember correctly. On Friday, 1 November 2013, Flavio Danesse wrote: > Since they talk DBus: > > Some time ago I raised the question of whether this should not be worn as > the new version of DBus is part of python-

Re: [Sugar-devel] DBusException: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.LimitsExceeded in sugar-build

2013-11-01 Thread Flavio Danesse
Since they talk DBus: Some time ago I raised the question of whether this should not be worn as the new version of DBus is part of python-gi: gi.module.DynamicModule 'DBus' from' / usr/lib/girepository-1.0/DBus-1.0.typelib I do not know much about DBus, but I guess sugar3 should be using this mo

Re: [Sugar-devel] Private vs Public conversations.

2013-11-01 Thread Flavio Danesse
Excuse me butting in this talk , but as they are addressing the issue of design, I think it's a good time to reiterate some proposals I have made several times. I think Sugar would do very well a change in appearance and in some cases functionality. I say it should be graphically attractive to use

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-web - How to load non-AMD js modules / libs?

2013-11-01 Thread Daniel Narvaez
I think we have been suggesting to use the shim. Modifying loader.js should be fine, the template one shouldn't change often. On 1 November 2013 22:02, Code wrote: > Hello, list! > I'd like to add a non-AMD lib (AngularJS in this case) to my activity. > > Here only points out how to add AMD one

Re: [Sugar-devel] Private vs Public conversations.

2013-11-01 Thread James Cameron
On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 10:12:52PM +0100, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > I think we are still very early in the life of the web activities > framework. I can't think of a single API that we could consider set > in stones. Thanks, correction accepted. I was speculating. -- James Cameron http://quozl.li

Re: [Sugar-devel] Private vs Public conversations.

2013-11-01 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 1 November 2013 22:09, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > On 1 November 2013 21:59, James Cameron wrote: > >> Use this phase of the process as an opportunity for you and your >> people to practice communicating with other developers in the >> community; and measure the effort in the design process, not

Re: [Sugar-devel] Private vs Public conversations.

2013-11-01 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 1 November 2013 21:59, James Cameron wrote: > Use this phase of the process as an opportunity for you and your > people to practice communicating with other developers in the > community; and measure the effort in the design process, not the > achievements. > > +1 > > In the first couple of

Re: [Sugar-devel] DBusException: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.LimitsExceeded in sugar-build

2013-11-01 Thread Daniel Narvaez
I cannot reproduce. Which distro are you using? It would be interesting to know if people on the same distro are seeing this. Couple of things you could try * Test with a clean profile. I wonder if it depends on what you have in your datastore for example. ./osbuild shell SUGAR_PROFILE=test run

[Sugar-devel] sugar-web - How to load non-AMD js modules / libs?

2013-11-01 Thread Code
Hello, list! I'd like to add a non-AMD lib (AngularJS in this case) to my activity. Here only points out how to add AMD ones: http://developer.sugarlabs.org/activity.md.html#using%20other%20javascript%20libraries Of course there are workarounds like adding script tags (I'd rather not) or setting

Re: [Sugar-devel] Private vs Public conversations.

2013-11-01 Thread James Cameron
p.s. it is good that you are being transparent with your decisions, because that gives you a chance to have them publically reviewed. ;-) On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 12:04:11PM -0500, David Farning wrote: > Thanks for the update. Currently, AC does not have the credibility to > participate in the des

Re: [Sugar-devel] Write fails to launch

2013-11-01 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Oh that would be great. On Friday, 1 November 2013, Peter Robinson wrote: > I'm happy to push abiword 3 to Fedora 19 but at the moment with Fedora > 20 there's an issue with Write that I would like people to assist me > in fixing first. > > Peter > > On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Gonzalo Odiard

Re: [Sugar-devel] Write fails to launch

2013-11-01 Thread Daniel Narvaez
It should be possible, might take some time to build though. I guess I would take a patch. I wonder if it make sense to update to F20 early. There are no XO build based on F19 anyway... Though, well, I have no idea if we will have any based on F20 either... And we might have to deal with instabili

[Sugar-devel] DBusException: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.LimitsExceeded in sugar-build

2013-11-01 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
Today, I needed add some testing using DBus, and didn't worked, giving me a error: dbus.exceptions.DBusException: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.LimitsExceeded: Connection ":1.88" is not allowed to add more match rules (increase limits in configuration file if required) but looking at shell.log, I se

Re: [Sugar-devel] Write fails to launch

2013-11-01 Thread Peter Robinson
I'm happy to push abiword 3 to Fedora 19 but at the moment with Fedora 20 there's an issue with Write that I would like people to assist me in fixing first. Peter On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > Hi Daniel, > Is not possible add abiword to the sugar-build modules? > > Gonz

Re: [Sugar-devel] Write fails to launch

2013-11-01 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
Hi Daniel, Is not possible add abiword to the sugar-build modules? Gonzalo On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > Yeah that's a known issue, unfortunately Fedora 19 doesn't have abiword > introspection support. It will be solved when we upgrade to Fedora 20. > > On Friday, 1 Nov

Re: [Sugar-devel] Write fails to launch

2013-11-01 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Yeah that's a known issue, unfortunately Fedora 19 doesn't have abiword introspection support. It will be solved when we upgrade to Fedora 20. On Friday, 1 November 2013, Sai Vineet wrote: > I am trying to open Write in sugar-build. I cloned the repo from > gitorious. But Write does not open. > >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Private vs Public conversations.

2013-11-01 Thread David Farning
Thanks for the update. Currently, AC does not have the credibility to participate in the design process. Let's give it 2-3 months for AC's R&D team learning how to work effectively with the HTML5+JS team at SL. In the first couple of weeks, I expect that this will mostly involve creating web activ

[Sugar-devel] Write fails to launch

2013-11-01 Thread Sai Vineet
I am trying to open Write in sugar-build. I cloned the repo from gitorious. But Write does not open. The write icons pulses for some time(~1s) and then it says that Write failed to start. The log says - Traceback (most recent call last): (4 lines of calls here) File "some file name here", li

[Sugar-devel] Sugar Digest 2013-11-01

2013-11-01 Thread Walter Bender
==Sugar Digest== 1. Congratulations and thank you to Daniel Narvaez, the Sugar release manager, and the Sugar developer team on the occasion of the release of Sugar 100. It is by far the best version of Sugar to date and it was developed using the most effective workflow we have yet to embrace as

[Sugar-devel] Gitorious "forgot password" option does not send e-mail.

2013-11-01 Thread Sai Vineet
I signed up for a gitorious account. I remember the password. I tried to login but Gitorious tells me that E-mail/Password didn't match So I tried doing a password reset throught the forgot password form. I entered my e-mail id(this one itself), and submitted the form. It's 3 days and I haven't g

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.100.0 (stable)

2013-11-01 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
In the next week, I will try prepare images for all the models. Gonzalo On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Lionel Laské wrote: > > Great ! Thanks a lot. > Just downloaded it and installed it on a XO-1.5. > Is there also an existing test image for XO-1 ? > > Lionel. > > > 2013/11/1 >> >> >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.100.0 (stable)

2013-11-01 Thread Lionel Laské
Great ! Thanks a lot. Just downloaded it and installed it on a XO-1.5. Is there also an existing test image for XO-1 ? Lionel. 2013/11/1 > > Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 00:24:33 -0200 > From: Gonzalo Odiard > To: "Dr. Gerald Ardito" > Cc: Daniel Narvaez , iaep > , Developers Li

Re: [Sugar-devel] Thanks

2013-11-01 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
Thanks to you, John. The XOs wouldn't exist without your work! Gonzalo On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 12:16 AM, John Watlington wrote: > > Since I finally mentioned that OLPC and I had parted ways in an earlier > email, I really need to thank the OLPC community for providing me > with the opportunity to

[Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release Java-3

2013-11-01 Thread Sugar Labs Activities
Activity Homepage: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4285 Sugar Platform: 0.86 - 0.100 Download Now: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/28813/java-3.xo Release notes: -some code cleans -add new style of toolbar -update activity.info with summary -replace service_name and class in

Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing sugar-build in Fedora 18

2013-11-01 Thread Iain Brown Douglas
On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 00:34 +0100, Iain Brown Douglas wrote: > On Sun, 2013-10-20 at 12:35 +0100, Iain Brown Douglas wrote: > > > On a PC running Fedora release 18 (Spherical Cow), xfce, > > Write 93 now starts and runs fine. I regret and apologise that this was a false rep