[Sugar-devel] Helping with 0.102

2013-11-23 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Hello, I've been doing a lot of bug triaging but we still have 192 untriaged tickets, hopefully I'll get to the bottom of the list at some point. Though the tickets which have been triaged are hopefully all current, actionable and somewhat prioritized. Or at least that's what I tried to ensure.

[Sugar-devel] setup.py install and git submodules

2013-11-23 Thread Manuel Quiñones
Hi, I'm trying to test SimpleActivity inside Browse. To solve maintaining the files of the library, I'm adding it as a git module: git submodule add git://git.sugarlabs.org/simpleactivity/mainline.git simpleactivity But seems that our setup.py install command doesn't support git submodules.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Introducing SimpleActivity / Introduciendo SimpleActivity

2013-11-23 Thread Manuel Quiñones
Nice! I will try to use it in Browse. We should aim to zero code duplication and make activities code easier. I gave a quick look at the code. I think SimpleActivity should take care of adding the Stop button. All activities will (must) have it. Please add an empty __init__.py file so we

Re: [Sugar-devel] Layout with gtk3

2013-11-23 Thread Manuel Quiñones
2013/11/22 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com: On 22 November 2013 12:49, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote: Hi, sorry for not joining the discussion yet. I'm a bit overloaded with non-Sugar stuff. Ufff, we need you full time! :P I remember Agustín Zubiaga also mentioned

Re: [Sugar-devel] setup.py install and git submodules

2013-11-23 Thread Daniel Narvaez
I'm not sure. I think we shouldn't refuse a patch that does that but before investing time in writing one I wonder if it would be better to research a bit the direction we should take worth code sharing... I think pypi is not as nice as npm, though I wonder if it would be better than using

Re: [Sugar-devel] setup.py install and git submodules

2013-11-23 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Another advantage of pypi is that distros knows how to deal with it already. To be honest I don't think activities should be packaged like distro packages though in practice people are doing that. On Saturday, 23 November 2013, Daniel Narvaez wrote: I'm not sure. I think we shouldn't refuse

[Sugar-devel] Stable branch in sugar-build

2013-11-23 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Hello, sugar-build has now a sucrose-0.100 branch too, which is also picked up by buildbot. Most people should keep using master really, but if for any reason you need to work on the stable branch this should be useful. I suggest to use a separate, clean clone to build it, switching branches

Re: [Sugar-devel] setup.py install and git submodules

2013-11-23 Thread Manuel Quiñones
2013/11/23 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com: I'm not sure. I think we shouldn't refuse a patch that does that but before investing time in writing one I wonder if it would be better to research a bit the direction we should take worth code sharing... I think pypi is not as nice as npm,

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Helping with 0.102

2013-11-23 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
Should be great start closing the 40 tickets in the defects list. Is good you take the time doing the triaging, thanks! Gonzalo On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I've been doing a lot of bug triaging but we still have 192 untriaged tickets,

Re: [Sugar-devel] XO-system 1a builds

2013-11-23 Thread Tom Parker
On 28/10/13 22:12, James Cameron wrote: On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 09:01:02PM +1300, Tom Parker wrote: zdextract in the bios-crypto package will unpack it, giving you a disk image, which you can then loopback mount as a filesystem and compare with another filesystem.