just
didn't get around to do it. Please, file a ticket for me so I don't forget.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http
On 05/19/09 16:34, David Farning wrote:
Infrastructure meeting are (usually) on Fridays.
Except that I've been quite negligent in running them, and I'm afraid
I'm going to be offline next Friday too.
Let's reschedule when I'm back from Paris, or follow up by email.
--
// Bernie Innocenti
://dev.laptop.org/git/projects/video-chat-activity/
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
or two while the
disk is copied. I'll email you again before I do it. Thanks.
Nick Schmalenberger
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel
David Farning wrote:
Nice,
Are they running on a new machine at PGRMR?
Not yet. I pinged the prgmr.com folks about it.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing
On 03/05/09 10:56, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
So, how are we going to celebrate it? As 0.84.1 is going to be on, we
could do a bug fix sprint during a weekend.
Should we get the marketing team to prepare a press release?
Did we announce it on Freshmeat? Slashdot? LWN? OLPCNews?
--
// Bernie
conversion.
Where does the bundle specification live these days? Last time I've
read it, it was still on wiki.laptop.org.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
. This way, at least, we
don't set the expectations of those few human posters too high.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http
that!
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
packaging addons in distros, but if there's any chance they want to
support source tarballs, we'll get that support for free.
Indeed!
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar
to the gitorious machine too (a waste of time since you cannot log
anywhere else anyway).
Though I would swear I was able last week.
Check $SSK_AUTH_SOCK from sunjammer, and try ssh-add -l to ensure
that your keys are still available. Works for me.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X
have
hard-coded or special-cased the new default in their code.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http
Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
You should be using gitorious@ rather than vepla...@.
Yes, it's awkward, but it's explained somewhere on the repository
page. Internally, gitorious dispatches individual users by means
/authorized_keys.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
with paravirtualized kernels.
Our sugarlabs4.xen.prgmr.com machine is already using it. Ask
dfarning for access to it while I'm still traveling around.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar
the actual status. Mick?
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
, or something like that.
I'd also like to discuss how our time-based releases relate with the
need to fix all blockers before a release.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar
Bernie Innocenti wrote:
Another issue is how we integrate the updater with addons.sl.o.
Because the OLPC microformat is trivial, it might be easy to modify
the remora's html output to be compatible with it. Mick, Tomeu and
David, who have had a closer look at the code, might want to comment
with
addons.sl.o as a backend.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
the mantra of doing only what nobody else is already doing.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org
Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
I guess at some point the default was Blocker, because there lots of
tickets marked that way in trac.
Yeah, we should re-prioritize them. Do we have a Bugmaster role?
We should
/me steps back... quickly!
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X
don't trust any
given individual to be able to do a good job without going through an
*extensive* iterative design process with public reviews of interim
drafts.
What's hardest about networking is that it looks deceptively easy at
first :-)
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X
on a nameserver running on the XS?
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
the event only after
the state has settled for a certain amount of time.
This would take away a certain percentage of spurious updates, but the
number basically remains proportional to the number of users so it
doesn't scale much better.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar
Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
Sugar has replaced in 0.83.x where it used gnomevfs with GIO, so we
can drop that dependency.
Kudos!
Sugar is loosing bloat so quickly that, at this rate, it will
disappear by 1.0.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http
the same proposal on the marketing list.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
not been shipped as an independent module and there
are no plans to do so.
Or does that mean that you have to split it out to a separate package
in order to comply with this D.P.P.?
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org
:)
What version of the XO builds is being deployed?
With what base activities?
The page says that the technical team will develop new activities.
We would like to stay in contact with the developers on IRC and on
the sugar-devel mailing list.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X
it was
fixed, but apparently not. I'll check and let you know.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo
Bernie Innocenti wrote:
[cc += sugar-de...@]
Victor Lazzarini wrote:
Thanks. Walter has kindly replied to me already, so it
looks like sugar labs is my destination. Hope to be able to
clear up all my marking by the end of next week and by
then I think will also know where I actually fit
Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 6:39 AM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
I meant it should have been optional, but if we switch to using the
Closes: header in the body, where we have no size constraints, then
we could has well use the prefix consistently.
One
to the size of the file. Writeable file
mappings are just not supported by jffs2, and cause mmap() to return
an error.
glibc likes to do it when building the locale-archive, and I vaguely
remember I had a workaround for this in our fork of the glibc rpm.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http
workarounds is
going to cost a lot of time.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
it looks super ugly in the subject of an email.
- To reduce clutter, I'd make the SL prefix implied, and leave
other prefixes such as OLPC#123 and RH#456 explicit.
Do we have a wiki page where we can document these practices?
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar
that for packages only maintained upstream at Sugarlabs
there is no need to add it to eah and eery bug hint.
I meant it should have been optional, but if we switch to using the
Closes: header in the body, where we have no size constraints, then
we could has well use the prefix consistently.
--
// Bernie
Walter Bender wrote:
Wow!!
We have great release notes lately.
To credit authors, I'd also append the patch summary by author,
Linus-style. It can quickly be obtained this way:
git log v0.83.3..HEAD | git-shortlog
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs
while rendering the main project page.
The errant user_id belonged to a user who got locked out and had asked
to be deleted. Now we know to be careful not to break referential
integrity if we ever need to hack the database again :-)
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X
Forgot to notify sugar-devel@
Original Message
Subject: [Systems] git.sugarlabs.org down?
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 12:45:17 -0500
From: Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org
Organization: Sugar Labs Foundation - http://sugarlabs.org/
To: OSU-OSL Support supp...@osuosl.org
CC: Sugar
for project names?
Gitorious uses intentionally two separate names, the slug, which is
a single lowercase word for the URL, and a pretty print project title.
Bernie said you have an account. It is the one at shell.sugarlabs.org.
Yes.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs
@ list: it's been
fixed a couple of days ago, but the rest of the traffic went through
osuosl's RT.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel
benchmarking between the two?
I'm not sure we'd ever want to add a dependency on libagg and
wxWindows, but it would give an idea of how good or bad our current
stack is.
The gnash folks, for instance, report huge performance gains by
switching from cairo to antigrain.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http
much slower (loading? parsing?
rendering?) and fix it, it would impact all of Sugar. This might be
an interesting opportunity!
Let me have a look this afternoon!
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org
to read and to quote.
Also, this is what git-send-email does by default, and what git-am
expects as input. Therefore, by following this convention you never
have to leave your precious shell to exchange patches over email :-)
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs
()
elapsed_time = end_time - start_time
print elapsed_time
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org
701 - 744 of 744 matches
Mail list logo
