[Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Feature Policy updated

2009-11-27 Thread Simon Schampijer
Dear Sugar community, the Feature policy [1] has been updated. * Why this process * Let me quote the first paragraph to exaplin what this policy is for: "The main goal of the feature process is to phrase out the ideas on how Sugar should evolve that are floating around in the community. These c

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [ANNOUNCE] Feature Policy updated

2009-11-29 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 11/27/2009 09:00 PM, Sascha Silbe wrote: > On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 07:40:26PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote: > >> * Backup up by the community * >> The proposer of the feature has to get feedback from the community. >> This includes technical feedback, feedback from the

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Versioning - Dotted Scheme

2009-11-29 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 11/29/2009 07:23 PM, Wade Brainerd wrote: > A problem with introducing dotted version numbers is that Sugar > versions 0.82-0.86 parse the activity version field using the Python > int() function. > a = int('100.3') > Traceback (most recent call last): >File "", line 1, in > ValueError:

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Versioning - Dotted Scheme

2009-11-30 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 11/30/2009 10:00 AM, Bert Freudenberg wrote: > On 29.11.2009, at 20:50, Simon Schampijer wrote: >> >> >> Well, if an activity will work for an older release is not only >> determined by the activity version number. For example, activities that >> moved to the n

[Sugar-devel] Feature Process for Activities was (Re: Sugar Digest 2009-11-30)

2009-11-30 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 11/30/2009 09:28 PM, Walter Bender wrote: [snip] > 2. Simon Schampijer, the Sugar Release Manager, has put together a > detailed set of pages in the wiki outlining our policy > [[http://wiki/sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Policy]] and process > [[http://wiki/sugarlabs.org

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-toolkit-0.87.1

2009-11-30 Thread Simon Schampijer
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-toolkit/sugar-toolkit-0.87.1.tar.bz2 == News == - updated translations ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-base-0.87.1

2009-11-30 Thread Simon Schampijer
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-base/sugar-base-0.87.1.tar.bz2 == News == version bump ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] hulahop-0.7.1

2009-12-01 Thread Simon Schampijer
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/hulahop/hulahop-0.7.1.tar.bz2 == News == version bump ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] 0.84 maintenance

2009-12-01 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 12/01/2009 06:41 PM, Daniel Drake wrote: > Hi, > > Earlier this year, OLPC began developing a new laptop (XO-1.5) and OLPC > OS (based on Fedora 11). Sugar-0.84 was hot off the presses at that time > so even though it may feel a little dated today, it's what we've been > working with and will so

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-datastore-0.87.1

2009-12-01 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 12/01/2009 08:29 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 05:39:07PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote: >> == Source == >> >> http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-datastore/sugar-datastore-0.87.1.tar.bz2 >> > > Please push Git tags too. For Debian packaging I prefer to

Re: [Sugar-devel] adding 3G devices support to sugar

2009-12-01 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 12/02/2009 03:04 AM, Martin Abente wrote: > > I have successfully extended jarabe/model/network.py, so we can > load-in a gsm connection, tested it with my app (gsmbridge) and it > works, tomorow ill clean up the code, add the control panel and the > device icon part. Hi Martin, wow, awesome y

Re: [Sugar-devel] Feature Process for Activities was (Re: Sugar Digest 2009-11-30)

2009-12-04 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 11/30/2009 10:56 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote: > On 11/30/2009 09:28 PM, Walter Bender wrote: > [snip] >> 2. Simon Schampijer, the Sugar Release Manager, has put together a >> detailed set of pages in the wiki outlining our policy >> [[http://wiki/sugarlabs.org/go/Featu

Re: [Sugar-devel] Removing Log and Terminal from favorites view

2009-12-04 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 12/04/2009 12:15 PM, Daniel Drake wrote: > Hi, > > For the OLPC builds we're removing Log and Terminal from the default > favorites view. Is there any interest in making this change in upstream > sugar too? > > The reasons being that these activities are confusing/useless for young > children, b

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Etoys 4.0.2339

2009-12-04 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 12/01/2009 01:53 AM, Bert Freudenberg wrote: > This is a bug fix release for the XO 1.5. Also suited for SoaS (if it's not > too late for that). etoys-4.0.2339 is as well the latest version that should go into 0.88? Thanks, Simon ___ Sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar master will depend on simplejson again

2009-12-04 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 11/19/2009 05:54 PM, Sascha Silbe wrote: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 04:33:05PM +, Daniel Drake wrote: > >> We've found that sugar's recent switch to cjson has caused issues and >> cjson upstream doesn't seem receptive to fixing them. > The latter isn't quite true: It has rejected the specific

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-artwork-0.87.1

2009-12-04 Thread Simon Schampijer
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-artwork/sugar-artwork-0.87.1.tar.bz2 == News == version bump ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

[Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Sucrose 0.87.1 Development Release

2009-12-04 Thread Simon Schampijer
Dear Sugar Community, this is the first development release in the 0.88 release cycle - see the schedule [1] for more details. There have not been many changes so far, as Features are under development or still in the brainstorm phase. One user visible fix is that several Access Points with th

[Sugar-devel] [BRANCHING] sugar-artwork, sugar-presence-service

2009-12-04 Thread Simon Schampijer
Hi, I have been branching sugar-artwork for 0.84 and 0.86. sugar-presence-service has been branched for 0.86. Regards, Simon ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Feature Process for Activities was (Re: Sugar Digest 2009-11-30)

2009-12-04 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 12/04/2009 05:07 PM, Gary C Martin wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On 4 Dec 2009, at 11:14, Simon Schampijer wrote: > >> On 11/30/2009 10:56 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote: >>> On 11/30/2009 09:28 PM, Walter Bender wrote: >>> [snip] >>>> 2. Simon Schampije

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Etoys 4.0.2339

2009-12-04 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 12/04/2009 03:49 PM, Bert Freudenberg wrote: > On 04.12.2009, at 12:59, Simon Schampijer wrote: >> >> On 12/01/2009 01:53 AM, Bert Freudenberg wrote: >>> This is a bug fix release for the XO 1.5. Also suited for SoaS (if it's not >>> too late for that

Re: [Sugar-devel] [FEATURE] Activity as a regular Journal Object request for inclusion to 0.88

2009-12-05 Thread Simon Schampijer
Hi Aleksey & others, just a quick note on the Feature process. This feature does not change or add new UI but is a huge change on the workflow. In these cases you should add the [DESIGN] flag, too. While thinking about it, I guess we nearly need design team feedback on all Features... ;) Eben

Re: [Sugar-devel] [FEATURE] Activity as a regular Journal Object request for inclusion to 0.88

2009-12-05 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 11/30/2009 08:54 PM, Daniel Drake wrote: > 2009/11/30 Walter Bender: >> This isn't quite accurate. We've been adding some pre-loaded content >> to the Journal for quite some time now, > > Are you sure? Or are you referring to a manual process that you do in > certain deployments? > > I have yet

Re: [Sugar-devel] [FEATURE] Activity as a regular Journal Object request for inclusion to 0.88

2009-12-05 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 12/03/2009 06:23 AM, Eben Eliason wrote: > On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:54 AM, Martin Langhoff > wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 9:40 PM, Wade Brainerd wrote: >>> When deleting an object from the Journal that is an activity bundle, >>> we ought to display an alert with a scary icon. The alert

Re: [Sugar-devel] [FEATURE] Activity as a regular Journal Object request for inclusion to 0.88

2009-12-05 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 12/03/2009 06:37 AM, Aleksey Lim wrote: >> On a more general note, this discussion has many hints of the >> action/object views that have been tossed around for some time now. >> This specifically addressed the conflict between the desire to manage >> all objects and the desire to have the Journ

Re: [Sugar-devel] seeking feedback on sketch of a new color selector

2009-12-06 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 11/12/2009 09:32 AM, Walter Bender wrote: > Thanks for all the feedback. Hi Walter, thanks for your work on this Feature and for using the Feature Policy. Your Feature has been accepted for the 0.88 sucrose release cycle for the following reasons: - your Feature is supported by the communit

Re: [Sugar-devel] seeking feedback on sketch of a new color selector

2009-12-06 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 11/12/2009 11:00 AM, Carlo Falciola wrote: > +1 for me for Keyboard... > maybe language should be in by default > > ciao carlo > > --- Gio 12/11/09, Walter Bender ha scritto: > >> Da: Walter Bender >> Oggetto: Re: [Sugar-devel] seeking feedback on sketch of a new color selector >> A: "Gary

Re: [Sugar-devel] [FEATURE] TableView Widget request for inclusion to 0.88

2009-12-06 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 11/28/2009 05:00 AM, Aleksey Lim wrote: > Hi all, Hi Aleksey, thanks for proposing this feature! > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/TableView_Widget > > GTK widget to replace gtk.TreeView in Journal. > > Benefit to Sugar > > Standard gtk components are not designed to be lazy. Third part

Re: [Sugar-devel] moving some more configuration to gconf (was Re: some efforts that would be really useful for deployments)

2009-12-07 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 12/06/2009 10:19 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > 2009/11/25 Daniel Drake: > [snip] >> >> Customizing browse homepage >> The procedure to do this is too complicated for most deployments, and is >> undocumented. >> >> Customizing which activities are in the favourites view by default >> You can do this

Re: [Sugar-devel] [FEATURE] [DESIGN] for Journal Plugins feature

2009-12-07 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 12/07/2009 05:58 AM, Aleksey Lim wrote: > On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 11:56:09PM +, Gary C Martin wrote: >> On 6 Dec 2009, at 21:19, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> >>> 2009/11/27 Aleksey Lim: On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 06:13:55AM +, Aleksey Lim wrote: > Hi all, > > Want to know what pe

Re: [Sugar-devel] [FEATURE] Activity as a regular Journal Object request for inclusion to 0.88

2009-12-07 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 12/06/2009 10:20 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > 2009/12/3 Aleksey Lim: >> On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 12:23:37AM -0500, Eben Eliason wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:54 AM, Martin Langhoff >>> wrote: On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 9:40 PM, Wade Brainerd wrote: > When deleting an object from the J

Re: [Sugar-devel] 0.84 maintenance

2009-12-07 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 12/07/2009 12:26 AM, Walter Bender wrote: > On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Gary C Martin wrote: >> Hi Tomeu, >> >> On 6 Dec 2009, at 21:19, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> >>> 2009/12/1 Daniel Drake: >>> Also on this topic - we will certainly run into issues where activities themselves progre

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.86 Favourites View behaviour - Browse

2009-12-07 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 12/06/2009 10:28 PM, Tim McNamara wrote: > Hi all, > > Am running Sugar 0.86.3. > > In general, I like how Sugar now opens the most recent item from the > Journal, rather than starting a brand new file. However, I think with Browse > - it's still useful for this to default to the homepage. > > I

Re: [Sugar-devel] seeking feedback on sketch of a new color selector

2009-12-07 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 12/06/2009 11:05 PM, Walter Bender wrote: > On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 8:54 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote: >> On 11/12/2009 09:32 AM, Walter Bender wrote: >>> Thanks for all the feedback. >> >> Hi Walter, >> >> thanks for your work on this Feature and for usi

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.86 Favourites View behaviour - Browse

2009-12-08 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 12/07/2009 08:16 PM, Tim McNamara wrote: > 2009/12/7 Simon Schampijer > >> On 12/06/2009 10:28 PM, Tim McNamara wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Am running Sugar 0.86.3. >>> >>> In general, I like how Sugar now opens the most recent item fr

Re: [Sugar-devel] moving some more configuration to gconf (was Re: some efforts that would be really useful for deployments)

2009-12-08 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 12/07/2009 11:39 AM, Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) wrote: > On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 10:11, Simon Schampijer wrote: >> Yes, I think it makes sense to control settings via gconf - this should >> be our standard way. > > Isn't Gnome thinking about dropping GConf ? (in fav

Re: [Sugar-devel] [FEATURE] [DESIGN] for Journal Plugins feature

2009-12-08 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 12/07/2009 01:09 PM, Aleksey Lim wrote: > On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 10:57:01AM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote: >> On 12/07/2009 05:58 AM, Aleksey Lim wrote: >>> On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 11:56:09PM +, Gary C Martin wrote: >>>> On 6 Dec 2009, at 21:19, Tomeu Vizos

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Add Fedora logo to Sugar

2008-12-08 Thread Simon Schampijer
Ivan Krstić wrote: > On Dec 7, 2008, at 2:46 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> Perhaps I explained myself badly, but I was proposing that distros >> would place their branding inside a control panel section, what now is >> called "About my XO" and that would be renamed to something like >> "About my compu

[Sugar-devel] SugarLabs QA-Meeting REMINDER (December 12 2008 - 16.30 (UTC)) --- irc.freenode.net, #sugar-meeting

2008-12-08 Thread Simon Schampijer
SugarLabs QA-Meeting In order to achieve a better product we have two main streams that try to achieve the same goal - the BugSquad (a team keeps track of current bugs in the sugar software and try to make sure that bugs are triaged correctly) and the testers that do the testing on various plat

Re: [Sugar-devel] Summer of Code

2008-12-08 Thread Simon Schampijer
Mel Chua wrote: > Thanks, Marco! This email is to both marketing and sugar-devel, to mark > the transition of the Sugar Labs Summer of Code effort from a marketing > project to a devel one. Future message on SoC will go to sugar-devel. > I've edited http://sugarlabs.org/go/DevelopmentTeam#Projec

[Sugar-devel] telepathy-salut libsoup

2008-12-08 Thread Simon Schampijer
Hi, telepathy-salut-0.3.6 in sugar-jhbuild does have the requirement of libsoup 2.2 (No package 'libsoup-2.2' found). I have libsoup-2.24 on F10 - would that meet the requirements as well - should it dep be >= 2.2 ? Thanks, Simon ___ Sugar-devel m

Re: [Sugar-devel] telepathy-salut libsoup

2008-12-09 Thread Simon Schampijer
Morgan Collett wrote: > On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 01:27, Marco Pesenti Gritti > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 11:35 PM, Simon Schampijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> telepathy-salut-0.3.6 in sugar-jhbuild does

Re: [Sugar-devel] telepathy-salut libsoup

2008-12-09 Thread Simon Schampijer
Simon Schampijer wrote: > Morgan Collett wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 01:27, Marco Pesenti Gritti >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 11:35 PM, Simon Schampijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>&

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar] [RELEASE] Browse 100

2008-12-10 Thread Simon Schampijer
Daniel Drake wrote: > Simon, > > On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 7:43 PM, Simon Schampijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Dear Browse, >> >> happy birthday! Marco and Tomeu honored you and provided excellent new >> features and fixed a very hard one - the down

[Sugar-devel] Sugar-Developers meeting REMINDER (December 11, 2008 - 14.00 (UTC)) --- irc.freenode.net, #sugar-meeting]

2008-12-10 Thread Simon Schampijer
Hi, this weeks agenda is: a) Schedule: adjust feature freeze b) create a short term TODO list of items (i.e. collaboration rock) and find owners and priorities c) developer items for the getting involved page (things/ideas that someone that have a bit of free time can help with, should be doa

[Sugar-devel] Sugar Labs QA MINUTES (Wednesday December 10 2008 - 16.30 (UTC))

2008-12-10 Thread Simon Schampijer
logs: http://meeting.laptop.org/sugar-meeting.log.20081210_1206.html - We agreed on the definition of the BugSquad (triaging, policies) [1]. - Sugar Core Testing: The quality of sugar core can be gauged by the sum of the quality of sugar on each platform. If a bug is present on one distributio

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bundling plugins with Browse

2008-12-10 Thread Simon Schampijer
Sayamindu Dasgupta wrote: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 3:47 AM, Bert Freudenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 09.12.2008, at 22:29, Sayamindu Dasgupta wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:37 AM, Bert Freudenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: On 09.12.2008, at 18:49, Sayamindu Dasgupta wr

[Sugar-devel] 0.84 Schedule: adjust feature freeze

2008-12-12 Thread Simon Schampijer
Hello, we discussed our current schedule in the developers meeting yesterday and agreed on the need to adjust the feature freeze in regard to the situation as of today. The new Feature Freeze, API, String freeze would be January the 16th - which will get our Beta 1 Release. Our final release d

[Sugar-devel] Sugar Developer MINUTES (Thursday December 11 2008 - 14.00 (UTC))

2008-12-12 Thread Simon Schampijer
Hi, a) Schedule: adjust feature freeze We did discuss the need to adjust the freeze, and announced that will, it will be officially announced if nobody brings up reasons why this would not work out nicely. b) create a short term TODO list of items (i.e. collaboration rock) and find owners and

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [Activities] New activity: Retroscope

2008-12-13 Thread Simon Schampijer
Samuel Klein wrote: > I'd use both, until there are other suggestions about how to handle > email overload for people who are working on activities but not sugar > (save to package the result). The activities list is pretty specific, > and was started because of people who couldn't read all of the

[Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Sucrose 0.84 Feature Freeze

2008-12-15 Thread Simon Schampijer
Dear Developers, Maintainers, Testers, Ladies and Gentlemen, as we discussed last week there was a need to adjust the feature freeze in regard to the situation as of today. The new Feature, API and String Freeze for Sucrose 0.84 is January the 16th - which will get our Beta 1 Release. Our f

[Sugar-devel] Not just a casual Team - join the Sugar Labs BugSquad

2008-12-16 Thread Simon Schampijer
Hello, the Sugar Labs BugSquad will come together for their first meeting. When: Wednesday the 17th December 2008 at 16.00 (UTC) Where: #sugar-meeting irc.freenode.net We have following agenda: * What is needed in trac to start triaging? * i.e. components, milestones * Meetings: when/if

[Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Sucrose 0.83.3 Tarballs Due the 18th December

2008-12-16 Thread Simon Schampijer
Dear Sucrose maintainers, please provide source tarballs for the Sucrose 0.83.3 Development Release by the end of the 18th of December and announce them as explained here: http://sugarlabs.org/go/DevelopmentTeam/Release#Module_release Note that we use http://download.sugarlabs.org now to host the

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Sucrose 0.84 Feature Freeze

2008-12-17 Thread Simon Schampijer
Greg Smith wrote: > Hi Simon, > > I looked at the schedule. Its helpful but I'm not sure I fully > understand all the milestones. > > What is the definition of "final release"? This is the golden image. It is the last coordinated release. After that we only deliver updates for components. > O

[Sugar-devel] Sugar Labs BugSquad MINUTES (Wednesday December 17 2008 - 16.00 (UTC))

2008-12-17 Thread Simon Schampijer
full details: http://sugarlabs.org/go/BugSquad/Meetings/Minutes/2008-12-17 * Do we agree on the mission? ** http://sugarlabs.org/go/BugSquad/Mission (got accepted) * What is needed in trac to start triaging? ** add sucrose components ** add milestones ** base work flow on http://wiki.laptop.org/g

[Sugar-devel] Sugar-Developers meeting REMINDER (December 18, 2008 - 14.00 (UTC)) --- irc.freenode.net, #sugar-meeting

2008-12-17 Thread Simon Schampijer
Hello, tomorrows agenda is going through the TODO list [1] and see which items we have fixed already. So you better make your home work :) And these two items are left from last week: 1) developer items for the getting involved page (things/ideas that someone that have a bit of free time can he

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Sucrose 0.83.3 Tarballs Due the 18th December

2008-12-17 Thread Simon Schampijer
Simon Schampijer wrote: > Dear Sucrose maintainers, > > please provide source tarballs for the Sucrose 0.83.3 Development > Release by the end of the 18th of December and announce them as > explained here: > http://sugarlabs.org/go/DevelopmentTeam/Release#Module_release > &g

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Sucrose 0.83.3 Tarballs Due the 18th December

2008-12-18 Thread Simon Schampijer
Morgan Collett wrote: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 22:24, Simon Schampijer wrote: >> Simon Schampijer wrote: >>> Dear Sucrose maintainers, >>> >>> please provide source tarballs for the Sucrose 0.83.3 Development >>> Release by the end of the 18th of Dec

[Sugar-devel] Moved the browse git repository to git.sugarlabs.org

2008-12-18 Thread Simon Schampijer
Hi, I moved the browse git repository to git.sugarlabs.org today. I updated sugar-jhbuild and did as well follow all the steps at http://sugarlabs.org/go/DevelopmentTeam/Git#Import_a_module_from_dev.laptop.org Cheers, Simon ___ Sugar-devel mailin

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Browse-102

2008-12-18 Thread Simon Schampijer
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/Browse/Browse-102.tar.bz2 == News == Updates in the Slovenian language Best, Simon ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-deve

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Jukebox v6 released

2008-12-18 Thread Simon Schampijer
Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 12:39:09AM +0530, Kushal Das wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I just released Jukebox activity v6. This is an activity for playing >> audio/video. You can download the .xo file from [1], the source is >> a

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Jukebox v6 released

2008-12-19 Thread Simon Schampijer
Kushal Das wrote: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 1:50 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote: >> Not all the repositories have been moved over. >> >> Kushal, >> >> instructions on how to do so are here: >> http://sugarlabs.org/go/DevelopmentTeam/Git#Import_a_module_from_d

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-toolkit-0.83.3

2008-12-19 Thread Simon Schampijer
Sources: http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-toolkit/sugar-toolkit-0.83.3.tar.bz2 News: * Fix palette highlighting on tray icons. Patch by benzea, style tweaks by marcopg * Rework palette state logic. Fix #42 * Use g_timeout_add_seconds() for power efficiency * Add color

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-0.83.4

2008-12-19 Thread Simon Schampijer
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar/sugar-0.83.4.tar.bz2 == News == * Fix language parsing on Gentoo and ALTLinux #81 (alsroot) * Change the FRAME_POSITION_RELATIVE to follow eben's spec * exec sugar-session * Add wired device icon for the frame * Only show w

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-0.83.4

2008-12-19 Thread Simon Schampijer
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar/sugar-0.83.4.tar.bz2 == News == * Fix language parsing on Gentoo and ALTLinux #81 (alsroot) * Change the FRAME_POSITION_RELATIVE to follow eben's spec * exec sugar-session * Add wired device icon for the frame * Only show w

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-artwork-0.83.2

2008-12-19 Thread Simon Schampijer
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-artwork/sugar-artwork-0.83.2.tar.bz2 == News == New icon for the wired network Thanks for all your contributions, Simon ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlab

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-base-0.83.2

2008-12-19 Thread Simon Schampijer
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-base/sugar-base-0.83.2.tar.bz2 == News == * Adding language he, bi, hu, sw, cs, sv, sk, wa * Updated translations Thanks for all your contributions, Simon ___ Sugar-devel mai

[Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Sucrose 0.83.3 Development Release

2008-12-19 Thread Simon Schampijer
This is our third Development Release in the 0.84 cycle. Besides all the great bug fixing that has been going into this release we want to highlight some interesting changes. First of all, big up to the translation team and their fearless leader Sayamindu for their steady ongoing work to make S

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Sucrose 0.84 Feature Freeze

2008-12-19 Thread Simon Schampijer
the OLPC devel list? Can you post your > Sugar announcements stuff to that list? That way I can reply there and > try to conform to Tomeu's list usage strictures. > > (kidding about "strictures" T-man, I'm just trying to do the right thing > :-) > > Simon

Re: [Sugar-devel] Some possible git patches for Labyrinth-4

2008-12-20 Thread Simon Schampijer
Gary C Martin wrote: > Hi Tomeu (and other Sugar devs), > > Here's some patches for the Labyrinth-4 work created with: > > git-format-patch 0d2bf1756d5f05b86a4f35ba8cbdb401b5cdb724 > > That covers all the commits I've re-made here to a clone of your > Labyrinth-4 git rep: > > http://g

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Jukebox v6 released

2008-12-21 Thread Simon Schampijer
Kushal Das wrote: > On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti > wrote: >> Could you please rename the git repository to jukebox (lowercase), for >> consistency with the other activities? > How to do that ? > > Kushal http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/jukebox/edit Best, Simon ___

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Jukebox v6 released

2008-12-21 Thread Simon Schampijer
Kushal Das wrote: > On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 12:45 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote >> http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/jukebox/edit >> >> Best, >> Simon > Oops, sorry , I never understood only a small change in that form can do that. > > Thanks :) > > Kush

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] TurtleArt-24

2008-12-22 Thread Simon Schampijer
[add bernie to cc] Walter Bender wrote: > I pushed a new release of Turtle Art to git.sugarlabs.org. Can you make the title of the project all lower case? In the Edit section. Added this info to the git page. New > features include a check on the image cache to make sure it is still > valid af

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.84 and 9.1 sync (was] [ANNOUNCE] Sucrose 0.84 Feature Freeze)

2008-12-22 Thread Simon Schampijer
Morgan Collett wrote: > On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 19:14, Greg Smith wrote: >> Hi Simon, >> >> On this: >> > En gros: So, bugs that are unique to the OLPC distribution should go >> > into OLPC trac. Other bugs should be filed upstream - in sugarlabs.org >> > trac. This has the advantage that other

Re: [Sugar-devel] Remove me from list please

2008-12-22 Thread Simon Schampijer
tomf...@comcast.net wrote: > ___ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > In general - you can do it at the bottom of the page: http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel I q

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2009 is a go!

2009-01-10 Thread Simon Schampijer
Mel Chua wrote: > That depends on what OLPC's GSoC focus is - it may *not* be Sugar at > all, in which case the organizational intern allocations should be (and > they should be, anyway!) independent of each other. > > Marcin, do you recall where you heard/saw that rule? Googling for things > l

[Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Reminder - Sucrose 0.84 Feature Freeze the 15.01.09

2009-01-10 Thread Simon Schampijer
Hi all, the Feature, API, String freeze is getting close (15.01.09) [1]. Please land your pending features, check items in the TODO list and verify that all the new strings are exposed and do not contain any typing errors. Wish you some upcoming productive days, Your Release Team [1] http:

[Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Sucrose 0.83.4 Tarballs Due the 15th of January

2009-01-13 Thread Simon Schampijer
Dear Sucrose maintainers, please provide source tarballs for the Sucrose 0.83.4 Development Release by the end of the 15th of January and announce them as explained here: http://sugarlabs.org/go/DevelopmentTeam/Release#Module_release Note that we use http://download.sugarlabs.org now to host the

[Sugar-devel] Memorize moved to git.sugarlabs.org

2009-01-17 Thread Simon Schampijer
Hey, i just moved memorize to the Sugar Labs repositories. Sayamindu, can you please point pootle to the new remote? Btw: I am still looking for developers and maintainers help for this cute little activity, one of the first that was available 2006, so Yeay! old school ;p I just got a request

Re: [Sugar-devel] wiki bugs

2009-01-17 Thread Simon Schampijer
Gary C Martin wrote: > On 17 Jan 2009, at 01:31, David Farning wrote: > >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join might prove to be a good example:) >> >> david > > Thanks David. Yea, been there, done that :-) You'll see I went with a > number of similar designs/elements for some of the icons alrea

Re: [Sugar-devel] feature freeze issue #2: making easier for people to title their activities

2009-01-17 Thread Simon Schampijer
Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > Hi all, > > yesterday we entered in feature freeze, meaning that no new features > can be committed without prior discussion in the community. > > The journal's search and browsing capabilities are less useful if all > entries are named the same regardless of their actual co

Re: [Sugar-devel] feature freeze issue #3: resume by default

2009-01-17 Thread Simon Schampijer
Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > Hi, > > one more issue we should discuss is a modification that came in last > week by which the favorites view in the home view displays the last > entries for each activity and allows easy resuming. See Eben's designs > in http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Designs/Activity_Manageme

Re: [Sugar-devel] Memorize moved to git.sugarlabs.org

2009-01-17 Thread Simon Schampijer
Aleksey Lim wrote: > On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 10:29:18AM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote: >> Hey, >> >> i just moved memorize to the Sugar Labs repositories. Sayamindu, can you >> please point pootle to the new remote? >> >> Btw: I am still looking for d

Re: [Sugar-devel] feature freeze issue #2: making easier for people to title their activities

2009-01-17 Thread Simon Schampijer
Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > Hi all, > > yesterday we entered in feature freeze, meaning that no new features > can be committed without prior discussion in the community. > > The journal's search and browsing capabilities are less useful if all > entries are named the same regardless of their actual co

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] feature freeze issue #2: making easier for people to title their activities

2009-01-18 Thread Simon Schampijer
quite logic thing to do. Thanks, Simon > On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote: >> Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> yesterday we entered in feature freeze, meaning that no new features >>> can be committed without prior

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-base-0.83.3

2009-01-19 Thread Simon Schampijer
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-base/sugar-base-0.83.3.tar.bz2 == News == * Don't print logs to tty instead of shell.log in the emulator * Trivial port to GIO instead of GnomeVFS ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sug

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-artwork-0.83.3

2009-01-19 Thread Simon Schampijer
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-artwork/sugar-artwork-0.83.3.tar.bz2 == Fixed tickets == * add activity-journal icon to artwork * add system-logout icon (part of #207) * add everything needed for the colorpicker. That is a small icon and a bit in the gtk

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-toolkit-0.83.4

2009-01-19 Thread Simon Schampijer
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-toolkit/sugar-toolkit-0.83.4.tar.bz2 == News == * separate debug settings from xsession #163 * show an alert on activity close for suggesting the user to set properties of the entry #215 * add a colorpicker to Sugar, only t

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-0.83.5

2009-01-19 Thread Simon Schampijer
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar/sugar-0.83.5.tar.bz2 == News == * make the journal entries in the favorites palette resumable * simplify the constants used to identify favorite layouts * separate debug settings from xsession #163 * add logout option #207 t

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Browse-103

2009-01-19 Thread Simon Schampijer
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Browse/Browse-103.tar.bz2 == News == * use cjson instead of json * new translations ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sug

[Sugar-devel] Sucrose Downloads not synced (was Re: [RELEASE] Browse-103)

2009-01-20 Thread Simon Schampijer
Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:16:02PM +, Simon Schampijer wrote: >> == Source == >> >> http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Browse/Browse-103.tar.bz2 > > Hmm

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sucrose Downloads not synced (was Re: [RELEASE] Browse-103)

2009-01-20 Thread Simon Schampijer
Simon Schampijer wrote: > Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:16:02PM +, Simon Schampijer wrote: >>> == Source == >>> >>> http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/s

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Write 61

2009-01-20 Thread Simon Schampijer
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Write/Write-61.tar.bz2 == News == * Make use of the ColorToolButton that benzea landed in sugar-toolkit * #3060 Filter object chooser so it shows only images * #8972 Save to OpenDocument if we cannot export in the original forma

[Sugar-devel] Pippy not ready for Sucrose

2009-01-20 Thread Simon Schampijer
Hi, the Sucrose package of Pippy is version 25 - when I last released it back in August. Since then there has been some development going into Pippy (now version 30) http://dev.laptop.org/git?p=projects/pippy-activity;a=shortlog But none of the maintainers did follow the Sucrose release cycle,

Re: [Sugar-devel] feature freeze issue #3: resume by default

2009-01-20 Thread Simon Schampijer
Gary C Martin wrote: > On 17 Jan 2009, at 15:30, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > >> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 15:54, Sascha Silbe >> wrote: >>> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 02:45:54PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote: >>> >>>> Issues: We do not have a don'

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-jhbuild in Gitorious

2009-01-21 Thread Simon Schampijer
Bernie Innocenti wrote: > Ciao, > > I finally tracked down and fixed the reason why the sugar-jhbuild > project was causing Gitorious to die with a 500 Internal Server Error. > > There were 2 records in table committerships referring to user_id=53, > which did not exist. This would make the temp

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Log v14

2009-01-21 Thread Simon Schampijer
Hi Wade, we were at version 16 already - this was in the 0.82 branch so hard to discover :/ http://dev.laptop.org/git?p=projects/log-activity;a=shortlog;h=sucrose-0.82 Can you make another release v17? (you can use the -v command when using the release script). Wade Brainerd wrote: > == Sourc

[Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Sucrose 0.83.4 Development Release

2009-01-21 Thread Simon Schampijer
Dear Sugar Community, Since, this date is Feature, API and String freeze everyone was busy getting their features in. From a user point of view we want to highlight the following: === Naming alert on journal entry creation === The journal's search and browsing capabilities are less useful if a

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [ANNOUNCE] Sucrose 0.83.4 Development Release

2009-01-22 Thread Simon Schampijer
Bernie Innocenti wrote: > Walter Bender wrote: >> Wow!! > > We have great release notes lately. > > To credit authors, I'd also append the patch summary by author, > Linus-style. It can quickly be obtained this way: > > git log v0.83.3..HEAD | git-shortlog Excellent, will do that for the nex

[Sugar-devel] Sugar-Developers meeting REMINDER (22 January, 2009 - 14.00 (UTC)) --- irc.freenode.net, #sugar-meeting

2009-01-22 Thread Simon Schampijer
===Topics=== a) February the 13th is the due date for our Sucrose 0.83 Release Candidate 1 (DevelopmentTeam/Release/Roadmap#Schedule). What needs to happen in the next weeks to get there? b) Update DevelopmentTeam/TODO list c) Auto-authentication for Browse when visiting web-based tools on the

Re: [Sugar-devel] feature freeze issue #3: resume by default

2009-01-22 Thread Simon Schampijer
Gary C Martin wrote: > On 21 Jan 2009, at 01:01, Gary C Martin wrote: > >> On 21 Jan 2009, at 00:18, Simon Schampijer wrote: >> >>> Gary C Martin wrote: >>>> On 17 Jan 2009, at 15:30, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >>>>> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 15:54,

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >