Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] FudCon January 2009

2008-12-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi, do we have any new Sugar features to add to F11 other than Sugar 0.84? Some areas I can think of: - server pieces like backup, etc - fast user switching - better integration with other desktops, for example by using the same NM settings storage that GNOME, or by using the same presence

Re: [Sugar-devel] View source redesign

2008-12-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 7:54 PM, Jameson Quinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am in the process of writing a patch to make the view source key extension able to open source in an appropriate activity. The basic scheme is: user presses view source extension asks activity (over dbus) if it wants to

Re: [Sugar-devel] SVG performance

2008-12-08 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Bernie Innocenti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Walter Bender wrote: I think the solution may be as simple as going back to GIF files. Having made the conversion to SVG, it is much easier to create internationalized versions of TA, but I am not taking any special

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar] Canvas

2008-12-09 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Sorry Gloria, but doesn't seem to be around here many people with experience with olpcgames. Did you managed to solve this issue? How is your activity different from the other activities that use olpcgames? Regards, Tomeu On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Gloria Meneses [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Sugar-devel] SVG performance

2008-12-09 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 3:04 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: bernie wrote: Jim Gettys wrote: IIRC, librsvg is it. A bit more profiling to get through the tangled web of dependencies is probably in order. To exclude the noise coming from Python and GDK, I tried timing again

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bundling plugins with Browse

2008-12-09 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Sayamindu Dasgupta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 12:20 AM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 7:45 PM, Sayamindu Dasgupta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 12:07 AM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Re: [Sugar-devel] amo script

2008-12-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi, got it to work, but had to modify a config file as below. Looks like the test data only has version data for firefox and thunderbird, but the code fails if there isn't version data for all the other apps. So I wait now for David to push his modifications to git.s.o. Regards, Tomeu Index:

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Sugar Digest 2008-12-15

2008-12-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 18:34, David Farning dfarn...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 18:15, David Farning dfarn...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com

Re: [Sugar-devel] About the default ogg player in sugar

2008-12-17 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
[changed to sugar-de...@sugarlabs.org] On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:39, Kushal Das kushal...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Still now the WebActivity handles the ogg files (audio/video). I am looking forward to have Jukebox activity to handle these mime types. From the current mime.defaults:

Re: [Sugar-devel] activities.s.o update

2008-12-18 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
no chance they would accept a patch that makes reference to Sugar and/or activities, right? Regards, Tomeu thanks david On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Hi, I'm working on a tree in git.s.o: http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/activities-sugarlabs-org

Re: [Sugar-devel] Announcing: New Fedora Sugar Spin Release

2008-12-18 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Thanks Sebastian, have updated http://sugarlabs.org/go/Supported_systems#Starch with this url. Do you want this image to be hosted at downloads.sugarlabs.org? Regards, Tomeu On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 22:42, Sebastian Dziallas sebast...@when.com wrote: Hi everybody, here is a new release of

Re: [Sugar-devel] Journal script

2008-12-20 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 17:51, Yamandu Ploskonka yamap...@bolinux.org wrote: Tomeu and all, Could we set some sort of something so pictures go to the SD card without manual work? If not something built-in and real-time, a cron job would still be nice Sure it can done, what about doing a

Re: [Sugar-devel] Some possible git patches for Labyrinth-4

2008-12-21 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 12:26, Gary C Martin g...@garycmartin.com wrote: On 20 Dec 2008, at 20:13, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 04:14, Gary C Martin g...@garycmartin.com wrote: Hi Tomeu (and other Sugar devs), Here's some patches for the Labyrinth-4 work created

Re: [Sugar-devel] Jabber client activity

2008-12-22 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
[adding sugar-devel as this is of interest also outside OLPC] On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 23:49, Mildred Ki'Lya ml.mildred...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone, I'm new here, and I came interested in the OLPC project because it's a wonderful computer, very well integrated, and I just had one via

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity page wiki location?

2008-12-23 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 13:05, Gary C Martin g...@garycmartin.com wrote: I was just musing on building a wiki page to document the spin of Labyrinth I'm hacking on, and I was about to create: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Labyrinth So... Should Activity wiki pages be migrating over to SL

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity page wiki location?

2008-12-23 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 13:32, Morgan Collett morgan.coll...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 14:25, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 13:05, Gary C Martin g...@garycmartin.com wrote: I was just musing on building a wiki page to document the spin

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity page wiki location?

2008-12-24 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 18:07, Gary C Martin g...@garycmartin.com wrote: On 23 Dec 2008, at 12:37, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 13:32, Morgan Collett morgan.coll...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 14:25, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Tue, Dec 23, 2008

[Sugar-devel] web-based activities (was Re: [IAEP] How to Make Activity Designers Happy , Parts I and II)

2009-01-02 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi, without needing to get into what is better for our deployments, I do see value in making easier to make Sugar activities using technologies such as HTML, CSS, etc Bryan, can we get into a more detailed view on what it would take ideally to create a new activity using such activities? Which

Re: [Sugar-devel] web-based activities (was Re: [IAEP] How to Make Activity Designers Happy , Parts I and II)

2009-01-03 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 20:30, Bryan Berry br...@olenepal.org wrote: On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 19:18 +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: Hi, without needing to get into what is better for our deployments, I do see value in making easier to make Sugar activities using technologies such as HTML, CSS, etc

Re: [Sugar-devel] web-based activities (was Re: [IAEP] How to Make Activity Designers Happy , Parts I and II)

2009-01-03 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
additionally handles GET/POST request to access the Journal entry for the activity. Doing this work would allow us to rewrite WikiBrowse in a much cleaner fashion, and would allow a whole range of first class Web-based Sugar activities. Cheers, Wade On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Tomeu Vizoso

Re: [Sugar-devel] TA with sensors

2009-01-03 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Also, see the link below for a way to detect when the activity window is visible or not: http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/sugar/repos/mainline/blobs/master/src/jarabe/journal/journalactivity.py#line298 It's used by the journal in order to decide whether it needs to auto refresh its view or not.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Architecture Documentation

2009-01-03 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 20:35, Morgan Collett morgan.coll...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 19:58, David Farning dfarn...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 3:10 AM, tbad...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi David, As I am in between jobs, I do some volunteer work with the local OLPC

Re: [Sugar-devel] idea for Sugar slogan and name

2009-01-11 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 20:13, Bryan Berry br...@olenepal.org wrote: I came up w/ an idea that would help us market Sugar to the general public. We need a slogan expresses what Sugar allows kids to do, its purpose, and puts a positive image in the minds of most people. Here is my slogan

Re: [Sugar-devel] idea for Sugar slogan and name

2009-01-11 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 16:11, imm ian.m.macart...@talktalk.net wrote: Sugar: A Place to Learn and Play or perhaps Sugar: A Place to Play and Learn I like the second form better. I think that ending on learn seems (to me, at least) to emphasise that aspect of its function. The first form

Re: [Sugar-devel] Journal integration for Scratch

2009-01-12 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 18:50, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote: On 12.01.2009, at 18:11, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: So what would the Scratch activity have to do so files put into the Journal (maybe by downloading) are displayed using a Scratch icon rather than the generic document icon

Re: [Sugar-devel] Journal integration for Scratch

2009-01-13 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 06:55, Philipp Kocher philipp.koc...@gmx.net wrote: Tomeu Vizoso wrote: On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 18:50, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote: On 12.01.2009, at 18:11, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: So what would the Scratch activity have to do so files put

Re: [Sugar-devel] calculate broken in sugar-jhbuild

2009-01-13 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 14:07, Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote: Hi! calculate is broken in sugar-jhbuild (./autogen.sh not found). Where's the right place to report it? Hi, http://dev.sugarlabs.org Thanks, Tomeu ___

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2009 is a go!

2009-01-13 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 18:21, Marco Pesenti Gritti marc...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: These days I'm amazed at the amount of stuff I'm capable to do when I don't have to switch between building packages, waiting for builds

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Groupthink 0.1 pre-alpha

2009-01-14 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 18:23, Gary C Martin g...@garycmartin.com wrote: On 14 Jan 2009, at 13:02, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: Hi Ben, can we use this on non-sugar pygtk apps? For example, could we use it to add collaboration features to Labyrinth (a pygtk app that we are reusing as a Sugar

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Groupthink 0.1 pre-alpha

2009-01-14 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 18:54, Gary C Martin g...@garycmartin.com wrote: On 14 Jan 2009, at 17:33, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 18:23, Gary C Martin g...@garycmartin.com wrote: On 14 Jan 2009, at 13:02, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: Hi Ben, can we use this on non-sugar pygtk apps

Re: [Sugar-devel] jhbuild obsoleted itself:)

2009-01-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 22:53, Marco Pesenti Gritti marc...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Luke Faraone l...@faraone.cc wrote: David, I don't see the justification in deleting these pages, they are still very useful for developers who need to get up and running. Those

[Sugar-devel] Write moved to git.sugarlabs.org

2009-01-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi, just moved this activity. Will update jhbuild next. Regards, Tomeu ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Write moved to git.sugarlabs.org

2009-01-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 22:35, Sayamindu Dasgupta sayami...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Hi, just moved this activity. Will update jhbuild next. You forgot Pootle :( ;-) I gave permissions to a bunch of people, including pootle

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] feature freeze issue #2: making easier for people to title their activities

2009-01-17 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 15:39, Mikus Grinbergs mi...@bga.com wrote: The journal's search and browsing capabilities are less useful if all entries are named the same regardless of their actual content or meaning to the user. What I cannot understand is why, after some two years of

Re: [Sugar-devel] feature freeze issue #3: resume by default

2009-01-17 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 15:54, Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote: On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 02:45:54PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote: Issues: We do not have a don't save those changes option. If you resume by default you could overwrite something you needed. So we loose the

Re: [Sugar-devel] Gdium.Com is launching the One Laptop Per Hacker program.

2009-01-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 12:31, Morgan Collett morgan.coll...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:20, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 02:35, si...@mungewell.org wrote: Donating laptops to worthy developer/developer projects. Might be of interest

Re: [Sugar-devel] jhbuild obsoleted itself:)

2009-01-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:46, Martin Dengler mar...@martindengler.com wrote: On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 05:15:53PM -0800, Edward Cherlin wrote: On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 1:15 PM, David Farning dfarn...@sugarlabs.org wrote: I have just gone through the wiki and deleted the

Re: [Sugar-devel] feature freeze issue #3: resume by default

2009-01-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 13:48, Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote: On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 01:40:46PM +0200, Morgan Collett wrote: On Ubuntu we're not supporting jhbuild on hardy any more, due to newer dependencies that are only in Intrepid. Thanks for the info. Would be

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-jhbuild on Debian/Ubuntu (was: Re: feature freeze issue #3: resume by default)

2009-01-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 14:04, Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote: On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 01:48:57PM +0100, Sascha Silbe wrote: Would be nice if there were a list of dependencies including versions. BTW: Where do I get the wnck Python binding? It's neither in Debian

Re: [Sugar-devel] Extensive jhbuild refactoring landed

2009-01-21 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 02:03, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote: On 21.01.2009, at 02:31, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: Hello, I landed David work on jhbuild. Please do a clean build and report any issue you run into. David, I guess we should remove the slo-buildbot repository to

Re: [Sugar-devel] Extensive jhbuild refactoring landed

2009-01-21 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 17:03, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 02:03, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote: On 21.01.2009, at 02:31, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: Hello, I landed David work on jhbuild. Please do a clean build and report any issue you

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Sucrose 0.83.4 Development Release

2009-01-23 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 15:56, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: === Journal === Tomeu Vizoso has been doing a wonderful work of bringing the journal implementation closer to it's design.The Object

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Sucrose 0.83.4 Development Release

2009-01-23 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 16:17, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Yeah, I recommend rsync'ing the ~/.sugar/default/datastore dir, maybe skipping the index subdir. You have the layout explained here: http

Re: [Sugar-devel] Problem running Sugar on openSUSE 11.0

2009-01-24 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
[adding sugar-devel to cc] 2009/1/23 James Simmons jim.simm...@walgreens.com: Jigish, OK, I uninstalled both sugar and sugar-activities, then installed just sugar. It did not complain of missing dependencies, and seemed to install just fine. Then I tried running sugar from the command line

Re: [Sugar-devel] Calling activities

2009-01-24 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 20:28, Wade Brainerd wad...@gmail.com wrote: Which activities are you referring to? You could download a file to the XO whose mime type is linked to an Activity. This would cause the Journal to launch the Activity to open the file. As far as I know, there is currently

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Sucrose 0.83.4 Development Release

2009-01-25 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 16:42, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: I actually would have appreciated more feedback when I asked for it some months ago. Anyway, I trust this layout change will simplify things

Re: [Sugar-devel] Call Activity

2009-01-26 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 18:58, Rodrigo Padula de Oliveira rodrigopad...@projetofedora.org wrote: Hello Guys! How can i call an activity from shell ? You can see here how the shell resumes or starts an activity:

Re: [Sugar-devel] addons.mozilla.org - what needs to be done?

2009-01-27 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi Mel, I'm very happy to know that you want to put your capable hands on this. Have started this page here: http://sugarlabs.org/go/ActivityTeam/Remora_port Please ask Bernie to setup the environment needed to hack on a.s.o and tell me what else I can help with. Regards, Tomeu On Fri, Jan

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Sucrose 0.83.4 Development Release

2009-01-28 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 03:28, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: You got distracted with shiny stuff! Rickrolled indeed :-) Is it possible for you to add a single file that says the journal storage

Re: [Sugar-devel] [olpc-nz] Hints for a Sugar dev intro?

2009-01-28 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 20:26, Brenda Wallace bre...@coffee.geek.nz wrote: I've got a book on python for sugar somewhere. My memory of attempts was lotsa watching git darcs and svk pulls followed by days of watching builds and then a error. Then trying again the next day hoping it was fixed in

Re: [Sugar-devel] Soas name

2009-01-28 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Agree with Mitch about Soas, but I like more Luke's suggestion. Regards, Tomeu On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 18:38, Luke Faraone l...@faraone.cc wrote: Or rock candy :) -lf On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Mitch Bradley w...@firmworks.com wrote: The name Soas lacks pizazz. How about

Re: [Sugar-devel] Missing Keyboard input on fresh Jhbuild

2009-01-29 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi Grant, may this thread help? http://unix.derkeiler.com/Newsgroups/comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc/2006-02/msg6.html Regards, Tomeu On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 05:13, Grant Bowman grant...@gmail.com wrote: Hi there, I'm new to the list. I received my G1G1 hardware on Jan 6th after ordering Dec

Re: [Sugar-devel] Naming of sugar, the Sugar Shell

2009-01-29 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 10:21, Morgan Collett morgan.coll...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 17:42, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 02:24:16PM +0100, Bernie Innocenti wrote: The change he prposes is s/olpc/sugar/, which I can hardly imagine as a violation

Re: [Sugar-devel] Exception for 'View Details' option for the object palette in the journal

2009-01-29 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:02, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: Hi, this is another little piece that is missing to meet the spec at http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Designs/Journal#04 The string is new - so no existing strings are effected. I would like to see this feature added

[Sugar-devel] moving tickets from dev.l.o to dev.s.o

2009-01-29 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi Michael, have heard that you have some of a pixie dust that may allow us to automatically transfer sugar tickets from dev.l.o to dev.s.o. Can you share a bit of it with me? Thanks, Tomeu ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org

Re: [Sugar-devel] Email client

2009-01-31 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 23:07, David Cabo david.c...@gmail.com wrote: What's the current status of Gears on the XO? Can it be added to Browser? I remember someone started working on it a few months ago, but unfortunately I don't know if they were successful. The reason I'm asking is that

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS at FOSDEM

2009-01-31 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 11:49, Marco Pesenti Gritti marc...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: Latest image and improvements (git head with some fixes) are listed in this post http://erikos.sweettimez.de/?p=332 It is even a bit

[Sugar-devel] working on addons.s.o

2009-02-01 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi all, I think Jason and Mick are the only ones that have shown interest and aren't subscribed to sugar-devel, so I have cc'ed them. We are starting to coordinate our work through http://sugarlabs.org/go/ActivityTeam/Remora_port and may use this list to keep everyone else updated on our work,

Re: [Sugar-devel] Xapian wrapper secore now called xappy

2009-02-01 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 18:03, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Some time ago whine initially packaging Sugar datastore, I found out that parts of it was a fork of the secore Xapian-wrapper project that was later renamed to xappy:

Re: [Sugar-devel] What is a blocker bug today?

2009-02-02 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 09:44, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote: Why is this bug marked as Blocker? http://dev.sugarlabs.org/ticket/199 I would say it's a blocker because that's the default value for that field and the first person who modified the ticket (Marco) after those fields

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-widgets request

2009-02-02 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 02:32, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote: Hi all, While tweaking/hacking some activities I have to, from time to time, copypaste code between activities. Sometime it works well: tempo slider from TamTam activities means 20-30 lines and 5-7 images. Now (for

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity updater

2009-02-02 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 13:00, Bernie Innocenti ber...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Jonas Smedegaard wrote: What Debian package? I found no mention of olpc-update anywhere in the source code for Sugar, so I guess you are talking about something OLPC-specific _below_ Sugar, right? olpc-update is the

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-datastore-0.83.3

2009-02-04 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-datastore/sugar-datastore-0.83.3.tar.bz2 == News == Rename the installed package from olpc.datastore to carquinyol. ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org

Re: [Sugar-devel] Cannot sugar-jhbuild update

2009-02-06 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
2009/2/6 Alex Holkner alex.holk...@gmail.com: File /home/alex/foreign/sugar-jhbuild/sjhbuild/main.py, line 31, in module import jhbuild.commands ImportError: No module named jhbuild.commands This happened to me some days ago, it was caused because the sugar-jhbuild/jhbuild submodule was

Re: [Sugar-devel] My first newbie question

2009-02-06 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
2009/2/6 Tom Wilson twilson...@yahoo.com: Hi there. I'm trying to get set up for Sugar development/debugging to see if maybe I can contribute. I saw in the wiki that there are difficulties with Mac OS X 10.5 - is that the case? I have VMWare Fusion, so I can set up on virtual Fedora or Ubuntu

Re: [Sugar-devel] Cannot sugar-jhbuild update

2009-02-08 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
2009/2/8 Ties Stuij cjst...@gmail.com: On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Ties Stuij cjst...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: 2009/2/6 Alex Holkner alex.holk...@gmail.com: File /home/alex/foreign/sugar-jhbuild/sjhbuild/main.py, line 31

Re: [Sugar-devel] Cannot sugar-jhbuild update

2009-02-08 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 09:10, Ties Stuij cjst...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: 2009/2/8 Ties Stuij cjst...@gmail.com: On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Ties Stuij cjst...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Tomeu Vizoso

Re: [Sugar-devel] Almanac Migrated

2009-02-10 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 02:15, David Farning dfarn...@sugarlabs.org wrote: The Sugar Almanac migration is complete! It is now at http://sugarlabs.org/go/DevelopmentTeam/Almanac A issue to mark the pages as migrated is at dev.lt.org#9241 Would someone please make a link and description from

Re: [Sugar-devel] Minimal steps to start hacking on Browse.xo?

2009-02-10 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 02:28, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: Hi! I found the git repo for Browse xo! Hurray! (finding things in github is hard work, or perhaps I managed to find the hardest path to it). Gitorious, not github, but do you have any suggestion? Not being a

[Sugar-devel] automated testing

2009-02-10 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi, I still hope we'll get automated test cases one day, and the creation of this new GNOME team looks like a big step towards that: http://live.gnome.org/DesktopTesting We would need to add AT-SPI support to hippo canvas, which would improve as well accessibility support. Regards, Tomeu

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] activites known not to either work at all or not on certin platforms

2009-02-11 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi, I see frustration but I'm having trouble knowing who should have done something and failed to do it. Can we get a list of issues, each of them with a list of people that may be able to do something about them? Thanks, Tomeu On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:16, David Van Assche

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activities migration status

2009-02-11 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 01:29, S Page i...@skierpage.com wrote: Ed McNierney wrote: On the other hand, anyone working on Sugar efforts such as Activity development should be encouraged to put all those efforts under the Sugar Labs roof where they can be more readily available to the entire

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Static services for Local Labs

2009-02-11 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Maybe the issue here is that local labs have a much broader scope than the global Sugar Labs? I see local labs having something to say about everything that the global Sugar Labs does, but not the other way around. Regards, Tomeu On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 17:35, Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-toolkit-0.83.6

2009-02-13 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Some bug fixes here, plus code changes to support fixes in the sugar module. == Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-toolkit/sugar-toolkit-0.83.6.tar.bz2 == Fixed tickets == * #55 dates in journal are not translated * #258 Keep error when displaying a file in

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] addons.sugarlabs.org

2009-02-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: http://addons.sugarlabs.org is up and running I expected this to be activities.sugarlabs.org, since the choice of 'addons' comes from Firefox and isn't part of the usual Sugar vocabulary, no? I thought this was odd naming also, activities.sugarlabs.org seemed

Re: [Sugar-devel] addons.sugarlabs.org

2009-02-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 04:43, genesee genesee@gmail.com wrote: Howdy, Is there an URL I can drop in Software Updates to download from this site via Control Panel? Not yet, but we'll be working on that soon. Regards, Tomeu ¡Gracias! genesee Tomeu Vizoso-2 wrote

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] addons.sugarlabs.org

2009-02-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 05:25, Gary C Martin g...@garycmartin.com wrote: On 13 Feb 2009, at 18:54, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: Hi, http://addons.sugarlabs.org is up and running. Please create accounts in there if you want to help in anything activity-related. Specifically, we need: - activity

Re: [Sugar-devel] buildbot failure in Sugar Labs Buildbot on log-activity-Fedora10

2009-02-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 21:02, David Farning dfarn...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: build...@sugarlabs.org wrote: The Buildbot has detected a failed build of log-activity-Fedora10 on Sugar Labs Buildbot. Full details are

Re: [Sugar-devel] buildbot failure in Sugar Labs Buildbot on log-activity-Fedora10

2009-02-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
-jhbuild bot --start-server --daemon david On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:37 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 21:02, David Farning dfarn...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: build...@sugarlabs.org

Re: [Sugar-devel] buildbot failure in Sugar Labs Buildbot on log-activity-Fedora10

2009-02-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
of hits per day. That doesn't look bad on a resume. ...and bernie has been a pretty good teacher:) david On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Ok. Breakers and fixers of sugar-jhbuild: please ping me whenever you need buildbot restarted. Thanks, Tomeu

[Sugar-devel] marking sugar.mime as deprecated

2009-02-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi, sugar.mime is marked as STABLE but I'm concerned that this might bite us without giving much back because the user is of limited use outside the shell and because we are quite likely going to need to change API because of gio having grown most of what we have there. What people think. Should

Re: [Sugar-devel] Little bits of atomicity...

2009-02-17 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 06:35, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: Hacking on bits of Browse is taking me down the path of reading various random bits of Sugar. And I wanted to drop a quick note... Modern POSIX systems give us a cheap safe atomic way of dealing with updates to

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] activites known not to either work at all or not on certin platforms

2009-02-17 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 04:57, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Wade Brainerd wad...@gmail.com wrote: First of all, IMO the *only* stable Sugar OS is OLPC XO Software 8.2.0 running on XO or emulator. As far as I know, none of the other

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] What's going on with Text To Speech on the XO?

2009-02-17 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 01:03, Samuel Klein s...@laptop.org wrote: Hemant, Tomeu, Assim and all, Has there been any progress on TTS since last summer? I'd love to see this project move forward. Prabhas has also indicated some interest in working on language-learning support, which is

[Sugar-devel] sugar on jaunty and abiword

2009-02-17 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi all, seems like, unless we make a strong final push, Write and other cool activities that make use of abiword won't run out of the box on the next Ubuntu release. This would mean a significantly less useful Sugar on what may be the widest available Linux distribution. It would be a real pity

Re: [Sugar-devel] Ignoring certain exceptions while debugging...?

2009-02-17 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 12:26, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Is there a better way? Sorry about the late reply. I'm having trouble understanding the doubt, can you reformulate your question (if it's

Re: [Sugar-devel] git.sugarlabs.org difficulties

2009-02-17 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 14:47, victor victor.lazzar...@nuim.ie wrote: After a cooling off period, now the connection is not refused anymore, but still no success. I now get a 'access denied or bad command'. I am using the git push gitori...@git.sugarlabs.org:csndsugui/mainline.git

[Sugar-devel] Fuse module to access datastore files from normal desktop

2009-02-17 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi tomeu, regards the fuse datastore module I have this questions: 1 - The title of an activity can contains all the character. But the filesystem canno handle / charater. At the moment this character became \ Is this correct? Yup, sounds good to me. 2 - Only activity that are stored data

Re: [Sugar-devel] Displaying flash activities automatically in Browse

2009-02-18 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:21, Bryan Berry br...@olenepal.org wrote: Kings of Browse, We are working from OLPC's Staging 32 build which I believe roughly corresponds to OLPC's 0.82.1 release http://dev.laptop.org/~bert/staging/32 We want to change Browse so that Flash .swf files are

[Sugar-devel] addons.sugarlabs.org is starting to work

2009-02-18 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi, as the site is becoming more functional, we are in need of feedback before we direct there the masses. Could activity maintainers register and upload their last activity bundles? Please try to also upload at least one screenshot, the site will be much prettier that way ;) Thanks, Tomeu

Re: [Sugar-devel] Newbie Developer - Where's the best place to start?

2009-02-18 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi, apart from the links already mentioned, I use to recommend people without previous pygtk experience to go through the chapters 1-6 and 10 of the pygtk tutorial: http://www.pygtk.org/pygtk2tutorial/index.html HTH, Tomeu On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 20:21, Wade Brainerd wad...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [Sugar-devel] git.sugarlabs.org difficulties

2009-02-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
2009/2/19 Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org: Martin Langhoff wrote: On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote: You should be using gitorious@ rather than vepla...@. Yes, it's awkward, but it's explained somewhere on the repository page. Internally,

Re: [Sugar-devel] What should we call it? Addons of Activities

2009-02-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
2009/2/18 Chris Ball c...@laptop.org: Hi, activities.sugarlabs.org +1 to activities here. Makes it clear and straightforward that it's the place to get Sugar activities, which is what it's for. Agreed, +1 to activities in spite of what I will write below. Since an argument against it

Re: [Sugar-devel] production aslo update

2009-02-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 15:59, David Farning dfarn...@sugarlabs.org wrote: No new commits for the production instance of aslo. We will be running some clean.sh and build.sh scripts to update the .mo (translation) files. Yep, that is right, Sayamindu Dasgupta should be able to hook aslo to

[Sugar-devel] resume by default

2009-02-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi all, as you may know, we recently added a change to the favorites view that makes easier to resume existing instances instead of always launching new ones. This option is disabled by default and users need to go to a palette and guess what that checkbox serves for. We added that option

Re: [Sugar-devel] Exception for 'View Source' strings in the sugar component

2009-02-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Yup, would be nice to get those in if translators agree. Regards, Tomeu 2009/2/19 Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de: Hi, the following patch does fix #360 and #365 and fixes the regression of being able to store the source in the Journal. Additions: _('Instance Source') _('Activity

[Sugar-devel] design team meeting

2009-02-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi, no meeting today? Regards, Tomeu ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] Reduce default emulator resolution to 1024x768

2009-02-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 17:47, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote: On 19.02.2009, at 17:21, Luke Faraone wrote: Anyway, I would like to try again, hopefully more clear this time, with this related thought of mine: It would be nice if the default - whatever it is, was expressed not

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] addons.sugarlabs.org is starting to work

2009-02-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
platforms before the addon is available to the general public. Regards, Tomeu On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Wade Brainerd wad...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 6:15 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: A long time ago, when using bundles was decided as necessary

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] addons.sugarlabs.org is starting to work

2009-02-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 18:23, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 18:18, Carol Farlow Lerche c...@msbit.com wrote: How does the Mozilla add-on functionality decide if there is a version or platform conflict for browser add-ons? it must be a piece of the browser

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >