...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
A few days ago, I saw a FirefoxOS cellphone.
I wonder if we can run Sugar web on that.
Gonzalo
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote:
Yes it's basically node.js + chrome + some custom bits to integrate the
two. It would be perfect to write
On 13 May 2014 16:13, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote:
On 12 May 2014 21:07, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
First, thanks for doing this work.
Thanks for helping out.
I would like
On 13 May 2014 01:49, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
* Should we contribute the olpc-os-builder changes back to OLPC or
fork it? I don't know if OLPC will do any active development on the
linux side of things, if not maybe better to turn this into a
sugarlabs thing.
Contribute,
(a vm I setup
yesterday). Then I'll do builds with the fixes Martin sent.
On 13 May 2014 04:27, Martin Abente martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com wrote:
Downloading!
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote:
xo4 image finally built (untested yet)
http
The xo1 image boots into sugar (latest from git) and wifi works. I'm now
building xo4 images
On 12 May 2014 02:12, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
A couple more images, for xo1 and xo1.5. They have sugar packages built
from latest sugar git. I have not tested them yet so they might
time.sleep(60)
Please help me out.
--
Regards,
Nazrul
irc - native93
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
in the screen.
Gonzalo
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote:
The xo1 image boots into sugar (latest from git) and wifi works. I'm now
building xo4 images
On 12 May 2014 02:12, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
A couple more images, for xo1 and xo1.5
kernel panic, but as Gonzalo mentioned the
fading problem is still present.
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 7:53 AM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.orgwrote:
I will attach a serial cable later and report.
Gonzalo
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote:
How far
Looks like eth0 is not initialized and all stop there.
Probably you already know that, but xo-1 and xo-1.5 have a 8686 wireless
card, different to the 8787 in the xo-4
Gonzalo
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote:
Ok, at least the partitions problem
acceleration)
[32.854] (II) VIA(0): Enable EXA Now
[32.854] (II) VIA(0): [EXA] Trying to enable EXA acceleration.
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm not quite convinced this is due to the not initialized eth0 (I'm not
sure what that is due too
it could be a good wrapper for web activities on GNOME/OS X/Windows.
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
[32.854] (II) Composite (RENDER acceleration)
[32.854] (II) VIA(0): Enable EXA Now
[32.854] (II) VIA(0): [EXA] Trying to enable EXA acceleration.
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm not quite convinced this is due
, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
github recently open sourced the shell they used to build the atom editor
https://github.com/atom/atom-shell
It sounds like it would be a pretty cool base for a future html5 only
sugar. Or event just mostly-html5, it seems like this could be easily
Hello,
things are looking good so far, we already have all the models booting into
sugar 0.101 with wif apparentlyi working. I would like to take a step back
and understand a bit better where we want to go with this. Some random
thoughts and questions.
* To really understand how much work is
...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
things are looking good so far, we already have all the models booting
into
sugar 0.101 with wif apparentlyi working. I would like to take a step
back
and understand a bit better
On 12 May 2014 21:07, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
First, thanks for doing this work.
Thanks for helping out.
I would like to take a step back and understand a bit better where we
want to go with this. Some random thoughts and questions.
* To really understand how much
On 13 May 2014 00:43, Paul Fox p...@laptop.org wrote:
daniel wrote:
* Should we contribute the olpc-os-builder changes back to OLPC or fork
it?
I don't know if OLPC will do any active development on the linux side
of
things, if not maybe better to turn this into a sugarlabs thing.
freeze.
On 11 May 2014 00:24, Martin Abente martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com wrote:
great!! Let me know when you have an image with this!
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote:
Firmware loading works with the rebuilt systemd! I have not tested much
but wifi
...@sugarlabs.orgwrote:
Downloading...
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Martin Abente
martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com wrote:
Downloading 10001xx1.zd , will let you know how it goes soon.
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote:
I made builds for xo1
:)
I have arm packages for latest git almost built, so tomorrow I should be
able to build xo1.75 and xo4 images too. The oob configurations and some
initial bits of automated builds infra are now here
https://github.com/dnarvaez/xugar
On 11 May 2014 20:49, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote
I built an image for 1.75
http://sugarlabs.org/~dnarvaez/oob/images/
I've not been able to test yet. I don't have my usual usb stick with me and
having troubles finding something the XO likes.
On 8 May 2014 02:04, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
As an update, I have patched xorg
On 9 May 2014 14:24, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 9:01 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 7 May 2014 01:44, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 04:24:39PM +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
[...] And with the XO stuck
On 9 May 2014 15:50, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 04:24:39PM +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
[...] And with the XO stuck on Fedora 18 we might not have good
enough introspection to make the port compatible with it.
If anybody would like to work
with stuff, building in the
virtual machine takes really too long.
On 9 May 2014 14:13, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
I built an image for 1.75
http://sugarlabs.org/~dnarvaez/oob/images/
I've not been able to test yet. I don't have my usual usb stick with me
and having troubles
By the way, I suspect the issue with small icons is something we already
fixed in 0.101. As soon as we have the base system working decently I'm
planning to make builds with latest sugar from git.
On 10 May 2014 01:22, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
I built a xo4 image, which like
a lot.
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote:
As an update, I have patched xorg-x11-drv-dove and built rpms for it
http://shell.sugarlabs.org/~dnarvaez/oob/f20-xo1.75/
Now building an image with those.
On 7 May 2014 15:18, Martin Abente martin.abente.lah...@gmail.comwrote:
Great!
I
On 7 May 2014 01:44, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 04:24:39PM +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
[...] And with the XO stuck on Fedora 18 we might not have good
enough introspection to make the port compatible with it.
If anybody would like to work on moving olpc
for testing :)
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote:
On 7 May 2014 01:44, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 04:24:39PM +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
[...] And with the XO stuck on Fedora 18 we might not have good
enough
here.
On 6 May 2014 08:00, Sam Parkinson sam.parkins...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 6, 2014 9:47 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 May 2014 14:42, kunal arora kunalarora@gmail.com wrote:
4)Create a new Sugar-toolkit-gtk3-python3 from the old one and also
keep
On 6 May 2014 12:28, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
* Make core and toolkit compatible with python 2 3
Does core need to be compatible with both? It seems like we could just
always run it on python3.
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
On 6 May 2014 12:53, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
* Research and if possible port telepathy-python to introspection. Bonus
points if testing is possible.
I thought the whole point of introspection was to get rid of things
like telepathy-python. This was certainly the case
On 6 May 2014 13:50, kunal arora kunalarora@gmail.com wrote:
The amount of work needed for either strategy will be almost the same but
in my opinion a codebase compatible with both python2 and python3 will
actually be harder to maintain as whenever we change something in the core
or
grunt
npm install -g grunt-cli volo
volo add -f
npm install
grunt
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
I pushed this because I have sugar-build changes that depends on it. Though
reviews are welcome
https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-web/pull/113
On 5 May 2014 21:03, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I just sent a pull request to add a grunt build to sugar-web. It allows
On 1 May 2014 14:42, kunal arora kunalarora@gmail.com wrote:
4)Create a new Sugar-toolkit-gtk3-python3 from the old one and also keep
the Sugar-toolkit-gtk3 for activities that haven't yet ported to Python3
and slowly deprecate it with time as more and more activities shift to
Python3.
On 1 May 2014 14:42, kunal arora kunalarora@gmail.com wrote:
So, I did some research and found that it would be best to port sugar in
the following way:
1) Resolve the dependency issue - mainly telepathy . Telepathy-python has
been deprecated , so what would be the best way to deal with
Hello,
I just built tarballs for 0.101.5, so we are now string, API and UI frozen.
Please think of the freeze before approving patches.
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo
, Apr 18, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Daniel Narvaez
dwnarv...@gmail.comjavascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','dwnarv...@gmail.com');
wrote:
By the way, if we decide to do it I think we should do it *before* the
meeting, so that we triage using github already and we don't risk to lose
information (or to have
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
-devel
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
I tried to do a migration using trac2github. Here is what it looks like
https://github.com/dnarvaez/test/issues/258
It's missing the reporter and it's not filtering by component but these
should be easy to add (it's php sigh, but still...).
On 19 April 2014 01:03, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv
By the way, if we decide to do it I think we should do it *before* the
meeting, so that we triage using github already and we don't risk to lose
information (or to have a really hard time fixing the script to preserve
it).
On 19 April 2014 02:03, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
I
be under the SL github org.
Otherwise they'll all be scattered. Right now it seems maintainers are
putting it under their own ids.
On Apr 13, 2014 8:48 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
For sugar I meant sugar-base really, keep getting that wrong!
On 13 April 2014 04:16, Daniel
://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
/ignaciouy/chat
Ignacio RodrÃguez
fb.com/Ignacio.Rodriguez.UY
@NachoDeTodos https://twitter.com/NachoDeTodos
+598 91 686 835
nachoe...@gmail.com javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','nachoe...@gmail.com');
2014-04-07 6:31 GMT-03:00 Daniel Narvaez
dwnarv...@gmail.comjavascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','dwnarv
the fallback 'C' locale.
I tried removing my profile but it didn't help. Does anyone know what it
is?
Thanks, Sam
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
--
Daniel Narvaez
@NachoDeTodos
+598 91 686 835
nachoe...@gmail.com
2014-04-07 6:31 GMT-03:00 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com:
Looking at my email, it sounds like Aleksey is offline for a while
but
Ignacio is co-maintainer. Adding both.
On Monday, 7 April 2014, Gonzalo Odiard gonz
Manuel, can you please add the hooks for clock-web and gtd-activity which
are already on github?
On 13 April 2014 00:56, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
We need to add buildbot hooks for the modules.
1 Go to the project settings, webhooks section
2 Click Add webhook
3 Make
Click generate token
6 Send it to me *off list*
On 13 April 2014 00:56, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
We need to add buildbot hooks for the modules.
1 Go to the project settings, webhooks section
2 Click Add webhook
3 Make Payload Url
http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org:3000/changehttps
Oh you need to osbuild pull first, forgot to mention that.
On 13 April 2014 03:07, Sam Parkinson sam.parkins...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Gdb wasn't installed inside sugar build so it didn't work. I did get
segfault though.
Thanks,
Sam
On Apr 13, 2014 9:49 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv
We tested all the setup with Walter and it worked nicely for Pippy.
On 13 April 2014 03:38, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Also you need to generate a token to let the application update status on
your repository commits. This is one per owner, not one per repository
1 Go to your
Here is what is left to do.
Pootle and redirect:
sugar
sugar-toolkit
pippy
Pootle, redirect, hooks:
chat
log
Mirror, pootle, redirect, hooks:
browse
write
read
terminal
imageviewer
jukebox
turtleart
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Update!
Pootle and redirect:
sugar
sugar-toolkit
pippy
turtleart
Pootle, redirect, hooks:
chat
log
Mirror, pootle, redirect, hooks:
browse
write
read
terminal
imageviewer
jukebox
Hooks only:
clock-web
gtd-activity
On 13 April 2014 04:09, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Here
For sugar I meant sugar-base really, keep getting that wrong!
On 13 April 2014 04:16, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Update!
Pootle and redirect:
sugar
sugar-toolkit
pippy
turtleart
Pootle, redirect, hooks:
chat
log
Mirror, pootle, redirect, hooks:
browse
write
Yes! I agree.
On Thursday, 10 April 2014, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Daniel Narvaez
dwnarv...@gmail.comjavascript:;
wrote:
Something else to consider is what to do with priorities. It might make
sense to set one when confirming bugs, it's
...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
Something else to consider is what to do with priorities. It might make
sense to set one when confirming bugs, it's hard to get right without
spending a lot of time really but maybe helpful
the tickets we _need_ fix, the tickets we _want_ fix,
and the tickets _would_be_nice_ fix.
We have almost 250 tickets, if we can solve 50 tickets in these 2 months,
is important know what are the best candidates.
Gonzalo
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:52 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote
volunteers some times more, some times less.
Just my two cents ...of pesos :)
Gonzalo
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote:
What I'm saying is that the would be nice to fix will never be fixed,
they will keep accumulating and we will waste triage time
On 10 April 2014 21:18, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 01:27:09PM +0100, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
What I'm saying is that the would be nice to fix will never be
fixed, they will keep accumulating and we will waste triage time on
them over and over. Better
On 10 April 2014 22:08, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10 April 2014 21:18, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 01:27:09PM +0100, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
What I'm saying is that the would be nice to fix will never be
fixed, they will keep accumulating
Sam sent a pull request to fix this, reviews would be appreciated
https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/pull/333
(You might have the honour to empty the review queue for the first time in
a looong while).
On 17 February 2014 12:57, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
parsing code
They only appear on sugar-build, not epiphany (another gtk-webkit2
browser) in gnome.
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4738 )
* use the 'handwritten' (notebook) theme in sugar slides (
https://github.com/SAMdroid-apps/sugar-slides ). That theme has 2 fonts
to load so maybe that is it?
On Apr 9, 2014 8:11 PM, Daniel Narvaez
dwnarv...@gmail.comjavascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml
On Wednesday, 9 April 2014, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Daniel Narvaez
dwnarv...@gmail.comjavascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','dwnarv...@gmail.com');
wrote:
This is an interesting blog post with a paragraph about GNOME triaging
http
found two problems with the web activities using webkit1
The first can be solved with http://ur1.ca/h1lgy
the second with http://ur1.ca/h1lh4
I understand the first problem, but still can't understand the second.
Gonzalo
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Daniel Narvaez
dwnarv
On Thursday, 10 April 2014, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Daniel Narvaez
dwnarv...@gmail.comjavascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','dwnarv...@gmail.com');
wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 April 2014, Gonzalo Odiard
godi...@sugarlabs.orgjavascript:_e(%7B%7D
Finally, something I think is important is to set enhancement vs defect. It
doesn't take much effort and it's very useful when we are feature frozen.
On Thursday, 10 April 2014, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Something else to consider is what to do with priorities. It might make
:20 PM, Daniel Narvaez
dwnarv...@gmail.comjavascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','dwnarv...@gmail.com');
wrote:
It starts a build whenever a pr is opened or reopened, while it's
building it shows that there is a build pending, then it changes the status
to success/failure. It also starts a new build
Looking at my email, it sounds like Aleksey is offline for a while but
Ignacio is co-maintainer. Adding both.
On Monday, 7 April 2014, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote:
On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 7:22 AM, Daniel Narvaez
dwnarv...@gmail.comjavascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','dwnarv...@gmail.com
...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
I asked because I received the mails yesterday for every pull request,
and then when was opened and closed,
but not when a build failed. Even in Test breaking build (#332)
May be is only received by who sent the pr?
Gonzalo
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 6:23 AM, Daniel Narvaez
On Sunday, 6 April 2014, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote:
Hi,
2014-04-04 8:18 GMT-03:00 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comjavascript:;
:
Hello,
I think we should move more of our modules to github, at least all the
ones
we are currently building in sugar-build
On Sunday, 6 April 2014, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 April 2014 14:10, Gonzalo Odiard
godi...@sugarlabs.orgjavascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','godi...@sugarlabs.org');
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Chris Leonard
cjlhomeaddr...@gmail.comjavascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml
-05 21:51 GMT-03:00 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com:
Hey,
I have finally setup integration between pull requests and buildbot.
When you push a pull request buildbot will trigger a build and update the
github UI to indicate success or failure. The idea is that we should not
normally
it to be particularly solid yet, so if you run into any
issue please let me know!
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
On 4 April 2014 14:10, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Chris Leonard
cjlhomeaddr...@gmail.comwrote:
I did not do the move to github and I do not know how to either. I am
going to need help to teach me how to do that.
In fact, I am getting
such an error.I am on ubuntu 12.04
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Oooh damn gtk2... This needs to be backported to sugar-toolkit
commit fe192be798ac1a9bd13983d197cb5775b7da2ad5
Author: Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
Date: Wed Sep 11 16:36:31 2013 +0200
Add a SUGAR_HOME environment variable
We should really use XDG directories
Setup a redirect from git.sugarlabs.org to github.com. Anyone knows
who/how did it for the core modules?
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
On 29 March 2014 11:30, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
We are not approaching 0.101.4 and the feature freeze, three days left.
There are three pull requests that I feel the freeze would apply to
https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/pull/192
https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-toolkit
Hello,
this is to announce the release of 0.101.4. We made some terrific progress,
have a look to the extensive release notes (credits to Walter Bender)
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.102/Notes
Thanks to everyone involved! We are now feature frozen and will focus on
bug fixing.
--
Daniel
SugarLabs - Learning Software for children
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
/sugarlabs/sugar-toolkit-gtk3/pull/124
Is there anything else outside the review queue?
On 13 March 2014 13:26, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote:
On 13 March 2014 08:50, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com
Hello,
I just updated sugar-build to use pep8 1.5.1. Please osbuild pull asap if
you are submitting patches, to avoid osbuild check errors when the code
will be merged.
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
Landed! Thanks!
On 23 March 2014 02:47, Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.org wrote:
Hi,
Just updated the pull requests.
https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/pull/298
https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-toolkit-gtk3/pull/125
Thanks for the reviews,
Sebastian
--
Daniel Narvaez
..
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Thanks.
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
file is exactly the same.
Any ideas? :)
Sam
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
.wordpress.com
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org javascript:;
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel
datastoreObject.setDataAsText jsonData
datastoreObject.save()
Neither methods end up getting called. I'm using 0.100.0.
Thanks,
Sam
--
Daniel Narvaez
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http
ele
undefined
datastoreObject.loadAsText onLoaded
activity.write = -
obj =
html: container.html()
jsonData = JSON.stringify obj
datastoreObject.setDataAsText jsonData
datastoreObject.save()
Neither methods end up getting called. I'm using 0.100.0.
Thanks,
Sam
--
Daniel
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/builders/quick-master/builds/73/steps/shell_2/logs/stdio
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Hehe, it's not like I'm picking on that patch, but it's apparently due to
it :)
https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/commit/5641a0607b1911c787d7cb7588266b9c68d37813
On Friday, 21 March 2014, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/builders/quick-master/builds/73
that run is getting its data
from gconf and that the gsettings are not actually being set properly
in either check or run.
Where are the gsettings stored by sugar-build? I cannot find them.
thx.
-walter
--
Walter Bender
Sugar Labs
http://www.sugarlabs.org
--
Daniel Narvaez
And would
2.5) osbuild run
work properly? If so, it sounds most likely like a sugar-build bug, check
should use a completely separated profile.
On Wednesday, 19 March 2014, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Daniel Narvaez
dwnarv
at 11:30 AM, Daniel Narvaez
dwnarv...@gmail.comjavascript:;
wrote:
On a phone so I can't look very deeply into this right now... Maybe we
are
using the in memory gsettings backend... Can you check if dconf is
installed
inside the broot?
./osbuild shell
rpm -qa | grep dconf
dconf
Ok, probably an easy sugar-build bug, will take a better look as soon as
I'm back at a keyboard :)
On Wednesday, 19 March 2014, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Daniel Narvaez
dwnarv...@gmail.comjavascript:;
wrote:
And would
2.5) osbuild
1 - 100 of 1729 matches
Mail list logo
